On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 23:15:25 +0100 (CET), Dag Wieers wrote:
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 08:57:23 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 11:58:45 +0100, nodata <fedora(a)nodata.co.uk> wrote:
> > > An rpm tool doesn't care about the filename, so why remove it?
> >
> > You have missed the point entirely. The filaname for an rpm is
> > typically constructed from a number of header tags as part of the
> > build process. The distrotags that are being used arent just in the
> > filename they are in the RELEASE tag.
>
> Which is part of the problem.
Please indicate where the problem is.
Done that before in this thread.
The current scheme has the following advantages:
+ It allows people to build trust for packages because the source becomes
visible (this works in both ways, if a package is good or bad)
*gasp*
Please tell me that you just made a joke.
People should _never_ deduce the origin of a package from its
filename.
[They may start to trust the signer of packages and the signed
packages which come from him.]