On 10/11/16 14:48, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> >
> > On 10/11/16 11:47, Ian Kent wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:23 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 11.10.2016 11:15, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [...]
> > > > > I guess the other thing you could do is grab the libvpx-
> > > > > 1.5.0
> > > > > source rpm and
> > > > > give it a different name like libvpx-compat, build and
> > > > > install
> > > > > it then the
> > > > > requirement of VirtualBox should be met without the
> > > > > dependencyLuxemburgo confessa agora que foi longe de mais,
> > > > > mas
> > > > > era inevitável. "Hoje não o faria, mas pela forma como se
> > > > > acercou de mim... Nenhum dirigente pode falar assim a um
> > > > > treinador ou a um jogador quando a adrenalina ainda está a
> > > > > correr". side effects
> > > > > above.
> > > >
https://smani.fedorapeople.org/compat-libvpx-1.5.0-1.fc26.src
> > > > .rpm
> > > Well done Sandro, I see you've taken care to clean up the extra
> > > installed files,
> > > this should work just fine Joachim.
> > Hi Ian Kent and Sandro Mani,
> >
> > this worked flawlessly (The only additional thing I had to do was
> > to
> > install /usr/bin/rpmbuild). After having installed the newly
> > built
> > rpm,
> > I could install a working VirtualBox.
> >
> > Tank you very much.
> May I recomend you rpmfusion rpms ? I am the packager maintainer
> and
> any feedback is welcome)
Hi Sergio,
i switched from Rpmfusion to Unitedrpms because Rpmfusion always
laggs
behind new Fedora versions, so ready-for-use packages are missing
for a
longer time period after a new Fedora appears. Unitedrpms seems to
be
faster.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
>
>
http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/VirtualBox
>
> >
> > Joachim Backes
> >
--
Sérgio M. B.