On mán 16.des 2013 21:45, Mike Ruckman wrote:
For those of us who haven't been with QA for even a year yet, can
give a brief "too long; didn't read" synopsis of your reasoning and
where it stems from? Without some form of background it's hard to infer
what your reasoning is.
You can look at the archive why we initially dropped the QA group and
the reasoning why we should not revive the QA group is related to the
future and I ain't talking about the future WG's "providing" us with but
an actual future and direction for the project be heading into.
Adam is right about what's wrong but as so often he's trying to fix it
in the wrong place...