On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 17:04 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
I think Anaconda should stay we need to expose the installer to as
much
testing as possible ( AutoQA should be able to take care of kickstarts
installation testing but that certainly leaves the GUI one out which
the
regular end users is exposed to ) and frankly I think the problem lies
elsewhere I sometimes have a gut feeling that Team anaconda is not
quite
following the same rules and regulation as the rest of the community.
Kamil noted explicitly that anaconda _dependencies_ are often broken,
which is usually not the fault of anaconda.
anaconda is developed just as any other Fedora component is.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net