On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 1:17 PM pmkellly@frontier.com <pmkellly@frontier.com> wrote:

On 3/22/23 03:57, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Here's a second draft. I took feedback here and also from the QA meeting
> [1]. The split between the milestones makes this harder to read and
> compare. If you have better ideas on how to do it, please tell me :-)
>

The only suggestion I have is for the foot notes under Final. Combine
the second note into the first.

I could do that, but it's helpful to see the information that there's a Basic criterion as well, right in the footnote title, without expanding it. But approaches work, though. Thanks for your suggestion.