On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 09:55 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> I wouldn't be hugely worried about any of them. Try doing a full install
>> and I suspect a lot of the above 'weirdness' would go away.
>
> Will do.
Done.
Which of these should I worry about?
[root@localhost ~]# grep -v stall install.log
warning: fontpackages-filesystem-1.44-2.fc15.noarch: Header V3 RSA/SHA256
Signature, key ID a82ba4b7: NOKEY
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.70BdJf: line 1: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: No such file
or directory
warning: %post(tomcat-servlet-3.0-api-0:7.0.26-1.fc16.noarch) scriptlet
failed, exit status 127
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pKiL8w: line 1: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: No such file
or directory
warning: %post(tomcat-jsp-2.2-api-0:7.0.26-1.fc16.noarch) scriptlet failed,
exit status 127
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.NaLh0X: line 3: find: command not found
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.hawg7Q: line 1: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: No such file
or directory
warning: %post(tomcat-el-2.2-api-0:7.0.26-1.fc16.noarch) scriptlet failed,
exit status 127
Running in chroot, ignoring request.
SELinux: Could not downgrade policy file
/etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.26, searching for an older version.
SELinux: Could not open policy file <=
/etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.26: No such file or directory
load_policy: Can't load policy: No such file or directory
6874 blocks
*** FINISHED INSTALLING PACKAGES ***
getenforce says Disabled, I expect because of the above Could nots.
Is this something that wold be fixed with an auto-relabel?
Are you somehow missing the selinux-policy-targeted package? That should
have the file in question.
The RPM post errors could be reported as bugs in those packages, though
they may be 'false errors', I guess. It _looks_ like those packages
aren't properly requiring tools they execute in their %post scripts.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net