On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 14:36, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Is this the same issue that others have seen with up2date
pulling (well,
> attempting to pull) rawhide files that no longer exist???
>
[...snip...]
I don't know whether up2date's willingness to download an
HTML file
should be considered a bug in up2date or in bad server maintenance. Don't
RPM files have a magic number or something that up2date could use to avoid
downloading the 404 file?
Once again, since this problem keeps coming up and people may not have
looked through the archives:
http://redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2003-October/msg03287.html
http://redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2003-October/msg03812.html
I have put this in bugzilla as an RFE for up2date -- #108652 -- as it
seems like a Really Bad Idea for up2date to just assume that downloaded
files are complete and correct without doing a check that takes very
little additional operational time (compared to the update process
itself).
Judging by Jesse Keating's response:
http://redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2003-October/msg03988.html
...we shouldn't have to worry about this problem much longer on the Red
Hat servers, but as we would expect over time that the FC community will
be using a variety of repos around the globe, some of them likely will
encounter this problem again. In those cases up2date should fail nicely
with a reasonable error message.
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE