A plea to proventesters

[Michael Schwendt]

To all testers, in particular the so-called "proventesters",

if in a bodhi ticket two testers have voted -1 and pointed out a major
flaw in the test update, please don't vote +1. If you don't take the
time to verify the -1, please vote at most +0. Thank you!

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/selinux-policy-3.9.16-32.fc15

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 22:43 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>  To all testers, in particular the so-called
> "proventesters",
>  
>  if in a bodhi ticket two testers have voted -1 and pointed out a major
>  flaw in the test update, please don't vote +1. If you don't take the
>  time to verify the -1, please vote at most +0. Thank you!
>  
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/selinux-policy-3.9.16-32.fc15 
Yup. Actually, we should probably put that in the instructions, if it's
not there already.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

[Michael Schwendt]

On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:00:42 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote:

>  > To all testers, in particular the so-called
> "proventesters",
>  > 
>  > if in a bodhi ticket two testers have voted -1 and pointed out a major
>  > flaw in the test update, please don't vote +1. If you don't take the
>  > time to verify the -1, please vote at most +0. Thank you!
>  > 
>  > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/selinux-policy-3.9.16-32.fc15
>  
>  Yup. Actually, we should probably put that in the instructions, if it's
>  not there already. 
It's there in the Wiki already:

  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Proven_tester#Previously_reported_bugs

And meanwhile, above selinux-policy update is on its way to stable. :-(
Bodhi karma automatism is broken in this regard.

So, is it intentional that we fix the AVC error with setroubleshooter?

[drago01]

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:00:42 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote:
>
> > > To all testers, in particular the so-called "proventesters",
> > >
> > > if in a bodhi ticket two testers have voted -1 and pointed out a major
> > > flaw in the test update, please don't vote +1. If you don't take the
> > > time to verify the -1, please vote at most +0. Thank you!
> > >
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/selinux-policy-3.9.16-32.fc15
> >
> > Yup. Actually, we should probably put that in the instructions, if it's
> > not there already.
>
>  It's there in the Wiki already:
>
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Proven_tester#Previously_reported_bugs
>
>  And meanwhile, above selinux-policy update is on its way to stable. :-(
>  Bodhi karma automatism is broken in this regard. 
Well the proper fix is to disable auto push if there is any negative vote.
The maintainer should then have to push it by hand (or if necessary
provide an updated package instead of letting it get pushed).

[Michael Cronenworth]

On 07/08/2011 05:40 AM, drago01 wrote:
>  Well the proper fix is to disable auto push if there is any negative
> vote.
>  The maintainer should then have to push it by hand (or if necessary
>  provide an updated package instead of letting it get pushed). 
https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/618