10:03 a.m.
A large libata update this time, moving to Jeff's latest 2.4.23 patch.
SATA users, let me know how well this works for you.
Dave
10:15 a.m.
Dave Jones wrote :
A large libata update this time, moving to Jeff's latest 2.4.23
patch.
SATA users, let me know how well this works for you.
Argh, just when I finally did a "yum upgrade" to FC development in order to
move the system to an SATA drive by using 2.6. I'll try to give it a try
nevertheless if userland still works with 2.4.
Matthias
--
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 1 (Yarrow) - Linux kernel 2.4.22-1.2132.nptl
Load : 0.54 0.84 0.82
11:16 a.m.
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 11:15, Matthias Saou wrote:
Argh, just when I finally did a "yum upgrade" to FC
development in order to
move the system to an SATA drive by using 2.6. I'll try to give it a try
nevertheless if userland still works with 2.4.
It should -- I'm running it and swapping my laptop back and forth
between kernels fairly regularly for various reasons right now
Jeremy
11:27 a.m.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:16:03PM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 11:15, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Argh, just when I finally did a "yum upgrade" to FC development in order
to
> move the system to an SATA drive by using 2.6. I'll try to give it a try
> nevertheless if userland still works with 2.4.
It should -- I'm running it and swapping my laptop back and forth
between kernels fairly regularly for various reasons right now
Unless you've run the selinux migration scripts and then I found the current
2.4 won't boot, but other than that switching between 2.4/2.6testX should be
relatively painless :(
From the readme in selinux-doc:
You may want to configure and build a 2.4+EA kernel if you still want
to boot 2.4 kernels on your system, as unmodified 2.4 kernels will not
boot after you have assigned the SELinux EAs to the root filesystem.
http://acl.bestbits.at/
Paul
11:44 a.m.
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Paul Nasrat wrote:
Unless you've run the selinux migration scripts and then I found
the current
2.4 won't boot, but other than that switching between 2.4/2.6testX should be
relatively painless :(
>From the readme in selinux-doc:
You may want to configure and build a 2.4+EA kernel if you still want
to boot 2.4 kernels on your system, as unmodified 2.4 kernels will not
boot after you have assigned the SELinux EAs to the root filesystem.
http://acl.bestbits.at/
Would it be a good idea to get these integrated into the next 2.4 testing
kernel if they're not already there, just to make it easier for people to
start testing the FC2 devel tree?
later,
chris
12:03 p.m.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:44:08PM -0500, Chris Ricker wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> You may want to configure and build a 2.4+EA kernel if you still
want
> to boot 2.4 kernels on your system, as unmodified 2.4 kernels will not
> boot after you have assigned the SELinux EAs to the root filesystem.
Would it be a good idea to get these integrated into the next 2.4
testing
kernel if they're not already there, just to make it easier for people to
start testing the FC2 devel tree?
A fix is being worked on, people are unlikely to hit it unless the deliberately
turn on selinux stuff and run make relabel IIRC.
Paul
11:53 a.m.
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 12:27, Paul Nasrat wrote:
Unless you've run the selinux migration scripts and then I found
the current
2.4 won't boot, but other than that switching between 2.4/2.6testX should be
relatively painless :(
Right, that's the one caveat right now. And hopefully that one will get
fixed soon :)
Jeremy
7454
days inactive
7454
days old
6 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Chris Ricker -
Dave Jones -
Jeremy Katz -
Matthias Saou -
Paul Nasrat