R -> texlive -> libpoppler

[dikshie]

Hi,
anyone aware about libpoppler issue in fedora 14 rawhide?

Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package R.x86_64 0:2.11.1-4.fc14 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: R-devel = 2.11.1-4.fc14 for package:
R-2.11.1-4.fc14.x86_64
--> Running transaction check
---> Package R-devel.x86_64 0:2.11.1-4.fc14 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: R-core = 2.11.1-4.fc14 for package:
R-devel-2.11.1-4.fc14.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: tetex-latex for package: R-devel-2.11.1-4.fc14.x86_64
--> Running transaction check
---> Package R-core.x86_64 0:2.11.1-4.fc14 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: texlive-dvips for package:
R-core-2.11.1-4.fc14.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: cups for package: R-core-2.11.1-4.fc14.x86_64
---> Package texlive-latex.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-56.fc15 for package:
texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: texlive-texmf-latex = 2007 for package:
texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: texlive-utils = 2007-56.fc15 for package:
texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/texconfig-sys for package:
texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/fmtutil-sys for package:
texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/fmtutil for package:
texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
--> Running transaction check
---> Package cups.x86_64 1:1.4.4-11.fc15 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: poppler-utils for package:
1:cups-1.4.4-11.fc15.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: ghostscript-cups for package:
1:cups-1.4.4-11.fc15.x86_64
---> Package texlive.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: texlive-texmf-fonts = 2007 for package:
texlive-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: texlive-texmf = 2007 for package:
texlive-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libpoppler.so.7()(64bit) for package:
texlive-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
---> Package texlive-dvips.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: texlive-texmf-dvips = 2007 for package:
texlive-dvips-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
---> Package texlive-texmf-latex.noarch 0:2007-36.fc14 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: tex-preview for package:
texlive-texmf-latex-2007-36.fc14.noarch
---> Package texlive-utils.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed
--> Running transaction check
---> Package ghostscript-cups.x86_64 0:9.00-2.fc15 set to be installed
---> Package poppler-utils.x86_64 0:0.15.0-4.fc15 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: poppler = 0.15.0-4.fc15 for package:
poppler-utils-0.15.0-4.fc15.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libpoppler.so.8()(64bit) for package:
poppler-utils-0.15.0-4.fc15.x86_64
---> Package tex-preview.noarch 0:11.86-4.fc14 set to be installed
---> Package texlive.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: libpoppler.so.7()(64bit) for package:
texlive-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
---> Package texlive-texmf.noarch 0:2007-36.fc14 set to be installed
---> Package texlive-texmf-dvips.noarch 0:2007-36.fc14 set to be installed
---> Package texlive-texmf-fonts.noarch 0:2007-36.fc14 set to be installed
--> Running transaction check
---> Package poppler.x86_64 0:0.15.0-4.fc15 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: poppler-data >= 0.4.0 for package:
poppler-0.15.0-4.fc15.x86_64
---> Package texlive.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: libpoppler.so.7()(64bit) for package:
texlive-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
--> Running transaction check
---> Package poppler-data.noarch 0:0.4.3-1.fc14 set to be installed
---> Package texlive.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: libpoppler.so.7()(64bit) for package:
texlive-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
rawhide/filelists_db

                                            |  19 MB     00:01
--> Running transaction check
---> Package texlive.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-56.fc15 for package:
texlive-dvips-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-56.fc15 for package:
texlive-utils-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-56.fc15 for package:
texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
---> Package texlive-texmf.noarch 0:2007-36.fc14 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: texlive-texmf = 2007-36.fc14 for package:
texlive-texmf-dvips-2007-36.fc14.noarch
--> Processing Dependency: texlive-texmf = 2007-36.fc14 for package:
texlive-texmf-latex-2007-36.fc14.noarch
---> Package texlive-texmf-fonts.noarch 0:2007-36.fc14 set to be installed
--> Running transaction check
---> Package texlive.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-56.fc15 for package:
texlive-dvips-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-56.fc15 for package:
texlive-utils-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-56.fc15 for package:
texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
---> Package texlive-texmf.noarch 0:2007-36.fc14 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/fmtutil for package:
texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/fmtutil-sys for package:
texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/texconfig-sys for package:
texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
--> Running transaction check
---> Package tex-preview.noarch 0:11.86-4.fc14 set to be installed
---> Package texlive.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed
---> Package texlive-dvips.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: texlive-dvips for package:
R-core-2.11.1-4.fc14.x86_64
---> Package texlive-latex.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: texlive-latex for package:
R-core-2.11.1-4.fc14.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: tetex-latex for package: R-devel-2.11.1-4.fc14.x86_64
---> Package texlive-texmf.noarch 0:2007-36.fc14 set to be installed
---> Package texlive-texmf-dvips.noarch 0:2007-36.fc14 set to be installed
---> Package texlive-texmf-latex.noarch 0:2007-36.fc14 set to be installed
---> Package texlive-utils.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
--> Running transaction check
---> Package R.x86_64 0:2.11.1-4.fc14 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: R-devel = 2.11.1-4.fc14 for package:
R-2.11.1-4.fc14.x86_64
--> Finished Dependency Resolution

Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
    R-2.11.1-4.fc14.x86_64 from rawhide
    R-core-2.11.1-4.fc14.x86_64 from rawhide
    R-devel-2.11.1-4.fc14.x86_64 from rawhide
    1:cups-1.4.4-11.fc15.x86_64 from rawhide
    ghostscript-cups-9.00-2.fc15.x86_64 from rawhide
    poppler-0.15.0-4.fc15.x86_64 from rawhide
    poppler-data-0.4.3-1.fc14.noarch from rawhide
    poppler-utils-0.15.0-4.fc15.x86_64 from rawhide
    tex-preview-11.86-4.fc14.noarch from rawhide
    texlive-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 from rawhide
    texlive-dvips-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 from rawhide
    texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 from rawhide
    texlive-texmf-2007-36.fc14.noarch from rawhide
    texlive-texmf-dvips-2007-36.fc14.noarch from rawhide
    texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-36.fc14.noarch from rawhide
    texlive-texmf-latex-2007-36.fc14.noarch from rawhide
    texlive-utils-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 from rawhide



best regards,

-- 
-dikshie-

[Michael Schwendt]

On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:35:45 +0900, dikshie wrote:

>  Hi,
>  anyone aware about libpoppler issue in fedora 14 rawhide? 
There is no "fedora 14 rawhide". Rawhide currently is Fedora 15
development. The broken dependencies in there are reported with the daily
"rawhide report".

[Rex Dieter]

dikshie wrote:

>  anyone aware about libpoppler issue in rawhide? 
Yes, a new poppler landed recently, and rebuilds are proceeding.  One of 
those just done recently was texlive.

-- Rex

[Genes MailLists]

On 10/01/2010 07:04 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>  dikshie wrote:
>  
> > anyone aware about libpoppler issue in rawhide?
>  
>  Yes, a new poppler landed recently, and rebuilds are proceeding.  One of 
>  those just done recently was texlive.
>  
>  -- Rex
>  
>   
 Is there any way to decouple the bulk of R from requiring texlive [1]?
It seems bizarre that a stats package has a deep coupling with a
typesetting language .. ;-)

  is there any way to make an R-reports or R-docs package to at least
isolate this coupling ?



 [1] Some of us are using different tex than the fedora texlive (at
least on f13 the texlive is too out of date (missing biblatex for example).

[Orion Poplawski]

On 10/01/2010 06:40 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>  On 10/01/2010 07:04 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > dikshie wrote:
> >
> >> anyone aware about libpoppler issue in rawhide?
> >
> > Yes, a new poppler landed recently, and rebuilds are proceeding.  One of
> > those just done recently was texlive.
> >
> > -- Rex
> >
> >
>
>    Is there any way to decouple the bulk of R from requiring texlive [1]?
>  It seems bizarre that a stats package has a deep coupling with a
>  typesetting language .. ;-)
>
>     is there any way to make an R-reports or R-docs package to at least
>  isolate this coupling ?
>
>
>
>    [1] Some of us are using different tex than the fedora texlive (at
>  least on f13 the texlive is too out of date (missing biblatex for example). 
R uses latex for documentation.  Not sure if there is a sensible split that 
would make it optional.  It should be able to require tex(latex) I believe for 
generic latex support.

CC'ing R-owner (spot).

-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: [phone]
3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion(a)cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com

[Genes MailLists]

On 10/01/2010 10:54 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>  On 10/01/2010 06:40 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: 
> >
> >   Is there any way to decouple the bulk of R from requiring texlive [1]?
> > It seems bizarre that a stats package has a deep coupling with a
> > typesetting language .. ;-)
> >
> >    is there any way to make an R-reports or R-docs package to at least
> > isolate this coupling ?
> >
> >
> >
> >   [1] Some of us are using different tex than the fedora texlive (at
> > least on f13 the texlive is too out of date (missing biblatex for example).
>  
>  R uses latex for documentation.  Not sure if there is a sensible split that 
>  would make it optional.  It should be able to require tex(latex) I believe for 
>  generic latex support.
>  
>  CC'ing R-owner (spot).
>   
   Unfortunately I install texive from upstream and there is no rpm ...
via tlmgr.

[Orion Poplawski]

On 10/01/2010 09:17 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>  On 10/01/2010 10:54 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 10/01/2010 06:40 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
> >>
> >>    Is there any way to decouple the bulk of R from requiring texlive [1]?
> >> It seems bizarre that a stats package has a deep coupling with a
> >> typesetting language .. ;-)
> >>
> >>     is there any way to make an R-reports or R-docs package to at least
> >> isolate this coupling ?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>    [1] Some of us are using different tex than the fedora texlive (at
> >> least on f13 the texlive is too out of date (missing biblatex for example).
> >
> > R uses latex for documentation.  Not sure if there is a sensible split that
> > would make it optional.  It should be able to require tex(latex) I believe for
> > generic latex support.
> >
> > CC'ing R-owner (spot).
> >
>
>      Unfortunately I install texive from upstream and there is no rpm ...
>  via tlmgr. 
You could provide your own stub rpm the provided it.  Unfortunately, looks 
like R-devel currently requires tetex-latex, that should get fixed.

-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: [phone]
3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion(a)cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com

[Stefan Grosse]

On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:54:50 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:


OP> R uses latex for documentation.  Not sure if there is a sensible
OP> split that would make it optional.  It should be able to require
OP> tex(latex) I believe for generic latex support.

Not to forget Sweave: R offers the possibility to create 'dynamic'
statistical reports typeset with LaTeX (very nice feature!) so
"bundeling" absolutely makes sense from my point of view...

Stefan

[Genes MailLists]

On 10/03/2010 09:51 AM, Stefan Grosse wrote:
>  On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:54:50 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
>  
>  
>  OP> R uses latex for documentation.  Not sure if there is a sensible
>  OP> split that would make it optional.  It should be able to require
>  OP> tex(latex) I believe for generic latex support.
>  
>  Not to forget Sweave: R offers the possibility to create 'dynamic'
>  statistical reports typeset with LaTeX (very nice feature!) so
>  "bundeling" absolutely makes sense from my point of view...
>  
>  Stefan
>  
>   
   Also note one point was that some of use a different (and newer)
version of latex ... so why force a particular and older one ? And
besides, if one wants one of those latex-dependent reports just install
latex ...

 I'd much prefer to think of this feature more like a browser plugin -
useful, functional nice if you want it .. but not required.