On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 23:22:06 +0200,
Michał Piotrowski <mkkp4x4(a)gmail.com> wrote:
W dniu 3 kwietnia 2011 23:11 użytkownik Bruno Wolff III
<bruno(a)wolff.to> napisał:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 23:05:52 +0200,
> Michał Piotrowski <mkkp4x4(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Of course it will be the best solution. But I doubt it will happen in
>> a next few weeks - so some temporary workaround for F15 would be
>> appreciated. It seems to me that this is a too serious problem to
>> release F15 without fixing/workarounding it somehow.
>
> tempfs is backed by swap, so this shouldn't be that big of a deal.
I filled free space on /run and I was not able to start services. So I
guess that it might be a problem on some systems. ()
I was thinking of the case where it was spilt into two. You are correct,
the current situation isn't good.
> Local
> users have other ways to try to kill system performance.
>
Yes, but it is not about performance - IMO in some cases it may be
qualified as local DoS.
You are right, I was thinking of where there was a separate tmpfs for
the /run/user directory and there could be a lot of memory pressure,
but system services would still be able to run.