Hi!
up2date seems to ping-pong between packages rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 and redhat-release-9.0.93-1. They obsolete each other so, if I up2date to redhat-release-9.0.93-1 and then run up2date again, redhat-release-9.0.93-1 is obsoleted by rawhide-release-9.0.93-2. If I up2date, rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 is installed, but running up2date again says rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 is obsoleted by redhat-release-9.0.93-1 and so on:
fab:/usr/share/rhn# sync up2dfab:/usr/share/rhn# up2date -l
Fetching package list for channel: redhat-linux-severn-i386-9.0.93... ########################################
Fetching package list for channel: redhat-linux-severn-i386-9.0.93-updates... ########################################
Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: redhat-linux-severn-i386-9.0.93...
Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: redhat-linux-severn-i386-9.0.93-updates...
Fetching rpm headers... ########################################
Name Version Rel ---------------------------------------------------------- rawhide-release 9.0.93 2
The following Packages are obsoleted by newer packages:
Name-Version-Release obsoleted by Name-Version-Release ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- redhat-release-9.0.93-1 rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 fab:/usr/share/rhn# up2date rawhide-release
Fetching package list for channel: redhat-linux-severn-i386-9.0.93... ########################################
Fetching package list for channel: redhat-linux-severn-i386-9.0.93-updates... ########################################
Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: redhat-linux-severn-i386-9.0.93...
Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: redhat-linux-severn-i386-9.0.93-updates...
Fetching rpm headers... ########################################
Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies... ######################################## rawhide-release-9.0.93-2.no ########################## Done. Preparing ########################################### [100%]
Repackaging... redhat-release ########################################### [100%]
Installing... 1:rawhide-release ########################################### [100%] *** rpmts_SetVSFlags(0x9c48fe8) ts 0x9c49090 *** rpmts_IDTXglob(0x9c48fe8) ts 0x9c49090 *** rpmts_IDTXload(0x9c48fe8) ts 0x9c49090 *** rpmts_SetVSFlags(0x9c48fe8) ts 0x9c49090 *** rpmts_IDTXglob(0x9c48fe8) ts 0x9c49090 *** rpmts_IDTXload(0x9c48fe8) ts 0x9c49090 0x9d1e488 -- ts 0x9d21ca0 db 0x9db9f88 0x9c48fe8 -- ts 0x9c49090 db 0x9c43bd8 0x9ccb4c0 -- ts 0x9ccaf18 db 0x9cc8890 fab:/usr/share/rhn# up2date -l
Fetching package list for channel: redhat-linux-severn-i386-9.0.93... ########################################
Fetching package list for channel: redhat-linux-severn-i386-9.0.93-updates... ########################################
Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: redhat-linux-severn-i386-9.0.93...
Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: redhat-linux-severn-i386-9.0.93-updates...
Fetching rpm headers... ########################################
Name Version Rel ---------------------------------------------------------- redhat-release 9.0.93 1
The following Packages are obsoleted by newer packages:
Name-Version-Release obsoleted by Name-Version-Release ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 redhat-release-9.0.93-1
Felipe Alfaro Solana (felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org) said:
up2date seems to ping-pong between packages rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 and redhat-release-9.0.93-1. They obsolete each other so, if I up2date to redhat-release-9.0.93-1 and then run up2date again, redhat-release-9.0.93-1 is obsoleted by rawhide-release-9.0.93-2. If I up2date, rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 is installed, but running up2date again says rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 is obsoleted by redhat-release-9.0.93-1 and so on:
rawhide release should not be in the channel, we'll try to get this loked at.
Bill
Le ven 29/08/2003 à 16:26, Bill Nottingham a écrit :
Felipe Alfaro Solana (felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org) said:
up2date seems to ping-pong between packages rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 and redhat-release-9.0.93-1. They obsolete each other so, if I up2date to redhat-release-9.0.93-1 and then run up2date again, redhat-release-9.0.93-1 is obsoleted by rawhide-release-9.0.93-2. If I up2date, rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 is installed, but running up2date again says rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 is obsoleted by redhat-release-9.0.93-1 and so on:
rawhide release should not be in the channel, we'll try to get this loked at.
rawhide-release-9.0.93... old the signature to sign packages : http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-beta-list/2003-August/msg01351.html
it is not the same package than rawhide-release-20030828... from rawhide repository.
rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 : https://rhn.redhat.com/network/software/packages/file_list.pxt?pid=148419
This problem have been reported : http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-beta-list/2003-August/msg01388.html http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-beta-list/2003-August/msg01405.html
Bill
Le ven 29/08/2003 à 16:58, Féliciano Matias a écrit :
Le ven 29/08/2003 à 16:26, Bill Nottingham a écrit :
Felipe Alfaro Solana (felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org) said:
up2date seems to ping-pong between packages rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 and redhat-release-9.0.93-1. They obsolete each other so, if I up2date to redhat-release-9.0.93-1 and then run up2date again, redhat-release-9.0.93-1 is obsoleted by rawhide-release-9.0.93-2. If I up2date, rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 is installed, but running up2date again says rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 is obsoleted by redhat-release-9.0.93-1 and so on:
rawhide release should not be in the channel, we'll try to get this loked at.
rawhide-release-9.0.93... old the signature to sign packages : http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-beta-list/2003-August/msg01351.html
it is not the same package than rawhide-release-20030828... from rawhide repository.
rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 : https://rhn.redhat.com/network/software/packages/file_list.pxt?pid=148419
This problem have been reported : http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-beta-list/2003-August/msg01388.html
Forget this! It's bad copy/paste. Sorry.
http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-beta-list/2003-August/msg01405.html
Bill