Re: fedora-test-list Digest, Vol 11, Issue 45

[vasundhar]

I am using Fedora core 3 on my IBM R51 2888c4 
with duel boot.
Cd mounting is done properly but eject mount is giving an error saying
failed to unmount disk.
Regards 
Vasundhar


On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:00:41 -0500 (EST),
fedora-test-list-request(a)redhat.com
<fedora-test-list-request(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
> Send fedora-test-list mailing list submissions to
>         fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         fedora-test-list-request(a)redhat.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         fedora-test-list-owner(a)redhat.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-test-list digest..."
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: onlyservice running and slowing system down (Jeff Spaleta)
>    2. Nvidia GeForce2 Intergrated Freeze (Gabriel Moreno)
>    3. Re: Bug with Java jre in FC3 (Colin Charles)
>    4. Re: 4g/4g patch? (Colin Charles)
>    5. Re: Firstboot is for RHEL - needs a cancel/bypass option
>       (Colin Charles)
>    6. Re: Semperon processors (Paul)
>    7. Re: Semperon processors (Paul)
>    8. Re: Semperon processors (Markku Kolkka)
>    9. lvm & logwatch (Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha)
>   10. Re: lvm & logwatch (Charles R. Anderson)
>   11. Re: lvm & logwatch (Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha)
>   12. Re: lvm & logwatch (Charles R. Anderson)
>   13. Fedora Core 3 Test Update:
>       selinux-policy-targeted-1.17.30-2.74 (Daniel J Walsh)
>   14. Re: lvm & logwatch (Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha)
>   15. OT: zlib clamav-0.81 (shrek-m(a)gmx.de)
>   16. Re: OT: zlib clamav-0.81 (nodata)
>   17. Re: OT: zlib clamav-0.81 (Howard Johnson)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:31:37 -0500
> From: Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta(a)gmail.com&gt;
> Subject: Re: onlyservice running and slowing system down
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
>         <fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com&gt;
> Message-ID: <604aa79105012619312a39735(a)mail.gmail.com&gt;
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:35:07 +1100, Rodd Clarkson <rodd(a)clarkson.id.au&gt; wrote:
> > I've got this process called 'onlyservice' that is using up all CPU
and
> > slowing everything down
> 
> this is one of the perl scripts used by logwatch to help parse logs
> based on a set of configuration files in /etc/log.d/conf/services/.
> If i understand the magic correctly, onlyservice will be called a
> number of times as logwatch loops through the several individual
> service config files. So i don't think its a big shock to see this
> process reappear after you kill it since i think it gets run multiple
> times. Why its chewing lots of cpu that i don't know. I'm seldom awake
> when logwatch runs as part of the cron.daily scripts.
> 
> onlyservice is located in  /etc/log.d/scripts/shared
> and is owned by the logwatch package
> 
> -jef
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:25:57 -0800
> From: Gabriel Moreno <esclavosoy.ml(a)gmail.com&gt;
> Subject: Nvidia GeForce2 Intergrated Freeze
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
>         <fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com&gt;
> Message-ID: <85e4e96405012623255d634dc1(a)mail.gmail.com&gt;
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> I have an ASUS A7N266 mobo that has an intergrated GeForce2.  After I
> install FC3 Stable.  And followed http://www.fedorafaq.org/#nvidia and
> then
http://www.linuxjunior.org/yabbse/index.php?board=12;action=display;threa....
>  Still everytime FC3 would try to load it would freeze.  I activated
> and deactivate rhgp and but whenever it would try start running x hd
> activity stoped after getting a blank screen.
> 
> I did have it working in the past and it works in windows.  Don't know
> what the problem could be.  I am just stumped.  I installed SuSE and
> it happens to work on   Pro 9.1
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Gabriel
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:34:14 +0800
> From: Colin Charles <byte(a)aeon.com.my&gt;
> Subject: Re: Bug with Java jre in FC3
> To: gslink(a)one.net, For testers of Fedora Core development releases
>         <fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com&gt;
> Message-ID: <1106631254.5401.45.camel(a)localhost.localdomain&gt;
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 09:08 -0500, gslink wrote:
> > It appears there is a bug in FC3 which causes display problems when
> > using attributed text in Java. All but the first character of lines
> > of
> > attributed text seems to vanish when displayed in the IBM 1.4.2 jre.
> > This did not happen in RH9. This is going to result in a serious
> > Bugzilla complaint.  Has anyone worked on this problem and gotten a
> > better lead on what is broken?  It would be helpfull if the Bugzilla
> > post contained a better description of the bug.
> 
> Considering that we don't ship the IBM 1.4.2 JRE, you're better off
> writing to IBM's bug tracker (if they have one), as its most likely not
> a FC issue
> 
> Do you see the same issue with the sun JRE?
> --
> Colin Charles, byte(a)aeon.com.my
> http://www.bytebot.net/
> "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
> then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:40:15 +0800
> From: Colin Charles <byte(a)aeon.com.my&gt;
> Subject: Re: 4g/4g patch?
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
>         <fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com&gt;
> Message-ID: <1106631615.5401.48.camel(a)localhost.localdomain&gt;
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 08:45 -0600, Philip Molter wrote:
> > The latest kernel update contains a few security fixes I need, but
> > I've
> > come to rely on the large 4GB lowmem space, and upgrading absolutely
> > kills me.
> 
> Probably grabbing it out of CVS might help ?
> 
> cvs.fedora.redhat.com
> 
> After all, for RHEL, a -hugemem kernel is still being built, so the
> patches are there (the .config is definitely there)
> --
> Colin Charles, byte(a)aeon.com.my
> http://www.bytebot.net/
> "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
> then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:45:30 +0800
> From: Colin Charles <byte(a)aeon.com.my&gt;
> Subject: Re: Firstboot is for RHEL - needs a cancel/bypass option
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
>         <fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com&gt;
> Message-ID: <1106631930.5401.50.camel(a)localhost.localdomain&gt;
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 03:29 -0500, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> > However, the firstboot is obviously for RHEL and doesn't provide any
> > means of bypassing or cancelling out of the RHN registration.
> >
> > Do y'all have any opinions as to whether this is a bug or something
> > that
> > needs to be bugzilla'd?
> 
> There used to be a bugzilla item open for this iirc, that the package
> owner was looking at; if its a regression and the bug's been closed, its
> worthwhile re-pinging it
> --
> Colin Charles, byte(a)aeon.com.my
> http://www.bytebot.net/
> "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
> then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 07:59:36 +0000
> From: Paul <paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk&gt;
> Subject: Re: Semperon processors
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
>         <fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com&gt;
> Message-ID: <1106812776.9470.1.camel(a)localhost.localdomain&gt;
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > > Now, if I have the processor set at 1GHz, it is recognised as an Athlon
> > > and will boot happily. If I switch it to be the 2.4GHz Semperon that it
> > > is, I get kernel panics and some very odd noises from the machine
> > > itself.
> >
> > Are you sure its a 2.4GHz proc - and not Semperon 2400 (1.66GHz)?
> 
> I was told it was a 2.4GHz processor, so that's what I'm working off.
> There is an auto clock setting on the board which also reports it as
> being that.
> 
> TTFN
> 
> Paul
> 
> --
> "I don't know how World War III will be fought, but I do know World War
> IV will be fought with sticks and stones" - Einstein
>