I maintain a local repository of the rpms on my systems. In earlier versions the commands
dnf repomanage --old . |xargs rm -rf cd ../ createrepo_c --update -c cachedir Packages
executed from the directory ..../Packages would clean out superseded rpm files and set up the repository.
What replaces dnf repomanage in the dnf5 system in fc42?
Hey Robert,
Thank you for reaching out. The repomanage was supposed to be developed as plugin and it has been slated in some later version. This means once you upgrade to F41; this won't work. I have added this email as ref to bump the issue this is getting tracked in [0] We are doing a test week for the upgrade[1]; post the feedback you have after the upgrade and also note that repomanage isn't working.
[0] https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/943 [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2024-10-11_F41_Upgrade_Test_Day
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 8:57 AM Robert McBroom mcforum@bellsouth.net wrote:
I maintain a local repository of the rpms on my systems. In earlier versions the commands
dnf repomanage --old . |xargs rm -rf cd ../ createrepo_c --update -c cachedir Packages
executed from the directory ..../Packages would clean out superseded rpm files and set up the repository.
What replaces dnf repomanage in the dnf5 system in fc42?
-- _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Am 11.10.24 um 5:37 AM schrieb Sumantro Mukherjee:
Hey Robert,
Thank you for reaching out. The repomanage was supposed to be developed as plugin and it has been slated in some later version. This means once you upgrade to F41; this won't work.
What are people supposed to use instead?
I have exactly the same use-case as the OP. What you say, to me means there is no way of maintaining local repos, in Fedora 41 anymore.
Ralf