9:33 a.m.
I'm sure I missed a notification somewhere, but am wondering why the
rawhide report no longer shows broken dependencies?
TIA
12:28 p.m.
On 07/07/2009 10:32 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> I'm sure I missed a notification somewhere, but am wondering why the
> rawhide report no longer shows broken dependencies?
>
maybe there are none? :)
-sv
Cute. I was ready to acknowledge that there none. :-)
9:54 a.m.
On Jul 7, 2009, at 7:33, "Clyde E. Kunkel" <clydekunkel7734(a)cox.net>
wrote:
I'm sure I missed a notification somewhere, but am wondering why
the
rawhide report no longer shows broken dependencies?
The script generating that list is fallng over and I haven't looked at
it due to being on vacation and in Germany for linuxtag and fudcon
before that.
--
Jes
10:07 a.m.
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Jul 7, 2009, at 7:33, "Clyde E. Kunkel" <clydekunkel7734(a)cox.net>
wrote:
> I'm sure I missed a notification somewhere, but am wondering why the
> rawhide report no longer shows broken dependencies?
>
The script generating that list is fallng over and I haven't looked at it due
to being on vacation and in Germany for linuxtag and fudcon before that.
Got some error outputs to send me?
-sv
10:34 a.m.
On Jul 7, 2009, at 8:07, Seth Vidal <skvidal(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 7, 2009, at 7:33, "Clyde E. Kunkel"
> <clydekunkel7734(a)cox.net> wrote:
>
>> I'm sure I missed a notification somewhere, but am wondering why
>> the rawhide report no longer shows broken dependencies?
>
> The script generating that list is fallng over and I haven't looked
> at it due to being on vacation and in Germany for linuxtag and
> fudcon before that.
>
Got some error outputs to send me?
No that is part of the problem, there is no error output.
--
Jes
5436
days inactive
5436
days old
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Birger Monsen -
Clyde E. Kunkel -
Jesse Keating -
Seth Vidal