Anaconda failures

[G.Wolfe Woodbury]

The latest anaconda (10.3.0.22-1) still fails with an unknown error.

I got past the selinux rpm denial by specifying "selinux=0" on the
options line (from ISOLINUX boot) but there is still an "abnormal" exit
after anaconda looks for the loop device.

(Why is it looking for the loop device when the only current method is
NFS Tree?)

Do the anaconda folks want continuing bugzilla reports on this, os is
posting here sufficient?

--Wolfe
-- 
G.Wolfe Woodbury     `- -'
RHCT                   U
The Line Eater is a boojum!

[Jim Cornette]

G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
>  The latest anaconda (10.3.0.22-1) still fails with an unknown error.
>  
>  I got past the selinux rpm denial by specifying "selinux=0" on the
>  options line (from ISOLINUX boot) but there is still an "abnormal" exit
>  after anaconda looks for the loop device.
>  
>  (Why is it looking for the loop device when the only current method is
>  NFS Tree?)
>  
>  Do the anaconda folks want continuing bugzilla reports on this, os is
>  posting here sufficient?
>  
>  --Wolfe
>   
In the past when I filed a bug against anaconda, it was replied to 
swiftly and a fix followed shortly thereafter.
I assume that the bug reporting against anaconda will still be similar 
in response.

Jim

-- 
QOTD:
	If it's too loud, you're too old.

[Jeremy Katz]

On Sun, 2005-09-18 at 20:14 -0400, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
>  The latest anaconda (10.3.0.22-1) still fails with an unknown error.
Yeah, we're segfaulting when probing for devices to start X.

>  I got past the selinux rpm denial by specifying "selinux=0"
> on the
>  options line (from ISOLINUX boot)  
The SELinux message is a red herring :)  We run in permissive mode
because the anaconda environment is "special"

>  but there is still an "abnormal" exit
>  after anaconda looks for the loop device.
>  
>  (Why is it looking for the loop device when the only current method is
>  NFS Tree?) 
stage2.img is a cramfs that gets mounted via loopback.

Jeremy