11:22 a.m.
Greetings.
My attempts to upgrade landed me in Rawhide instead of Branched.
I know I've been successful in the past with these types of upgrades,
but I don't recall how I did it, and Googling hasn't given me the answer.
TIA
Scott
12:24 p.m.
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 09:22 (UTC-0800):
My attempts to upgrade landed me in Rawhide instead of Branched.
My last one, on a Core2Duo, did too, but I caught it right away and fixed the repo
configs with dnf config-manager IIRC followed by simply dnf upgrade
--releasever=38 --skip-broken. There was one new package that makes kernel locking
more complicated.
# pinxi -Saz --zl --hostname
System:
Host: big41 Kernel: 6.1.10-200.fc37.x86_64 arch: x86_64 bits: 64
compiler: gcc v: 2.38-25.fc37 parameters: ro root=LABEL=<filter>
ipv6.disable=1 net.ifnames=0 mitigations=auto consoleblank=0
Desktop: KDE Plasma v: 5.26.90 tk: Qt v: 5.15.8 wm: kwin_x11 vt: 7 dm:
1: KDM 2: XDM Distro: Fedora release 38 (Rawhide)
--
Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion,
based on faith, not based on science.
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata
5:09 p.m.
On 2/12/2023 10:24 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 09:22 (UTC-0800):
> My attempts to upgrade landed me in Rawhide instead of Branched.
My last one, on a Core2Duo, did too, but I caught it right away and fixed the repo
configs with dnf config-manager IIRC followed by simply dnf upgrade
--releasever=38 --skip-broken. There was one new package that makes kernel locking
more complicated.
Can you elaborate on what you did?
Thanks.
Scott
6:50 p.m.
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 15:09 (UTC-0800):
Felix Miata wrote:
> Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 09:22 (UTC-0800):
>> My attempts to upgrade landed me in Rawhide instead of
Branched.
> My last one, on a Core2Duo, did too, but I caught it right away
and fixed the repo
> configs with dnf config-manager IIRC followed by simply dnf upgrade
> --releasever=38 --skip-broken. There was one new package that makes kernel locking
> more complicated.
Can you elaborate on what you did?
Not with any more detail than contained in the relevant period in .bash_history. A *lot*
has transpired in the mean time.
dnf clean all
#1676142230
dfh /
#1676142333
dnfpre.sh38
#1676142492
dfh /
#1676142521
time dnf system-upgrade --releasever=38 --skip-broken
#1676142531
time dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=38 --skip-broken
#1676142723
time dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=38 --skip-broken --best
#1676142788
dnf upgrade plasma-workspace plasma-workspace-common
#1676142801
dnf upgrade --releasever=38 plasma-workspace plasma-workspace-common
#1676143115
dfh
#1676143128
dnf clean packages
#1676143131
dfh /
#1676143184
time dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=38 --skip-broken --best
#1676143420
rpm -e --nodeps geoclue2 xdg-desktop-portal
#1676143443
time dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=38 --skip-broken --best
#1676144651
dfh
#1676144672
dnf system-upgrade reboot
#1676145175
journalctl -b -1
#1676145224
time dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=38 --skip-broken --best
#1676145333
dnf system-upgrade reboot
#1676145815
rpmqa fc37 | wc -l
#1676145823
rpmqa fc38 | wc -l
#1676145834
lr /boot
#1676145894
rpmqa fc39 | wc -l
#1676145909
dnf repolist enabled
#1676145926
dnf config-manager --set-disabled rawhide
#1676145949
dnf config-manager --set-enabled fedora updates updates-testing
#1676145958
dnf repolist all
#1676145975
rpmqa fedora
#1676146046
dnf install --releasever=38 fedora-release fedora-release-common
fedora-release-identity-basic fedora-repos fedora-gpg-keys
#1676146075
dnf downgrade --releasever=38 fedora-release fedora-release-common
fedora-release-identity-basic fedora-repos fedora-gpg-keys
#1676146091
dnf repolist all
#1676146103
rpmqa fc39
#1676146297
dnf clean all
#1676146303
dnf makecache
#1676146574
time dnf upgrade
#1676146608
time dnf upgrade --releasever=38
#1676146959
rpmqa fc38
#1676146964
rpmqa fc39
#1676146968
rpmqa fc37
#1676147014
rpmqa odem
#1676147028
rpm -e ModemManager-glib
#1676147036
rpm -e ModemManager-glib geoclue2
#1676147045
rpm -e ModemManager-glib geoclue2 xdg-desktop-portal
#1676147057
rpm -e ModemManager-glib geoclue2 xdg-desktop-portal xdg-desktop-portal-gtk
#1676147200
Reboot
#1676145815
rpmqa fc37 | wc -l
#1676145823
rpmqa fc38 | wc -l
#1676145834
lr /boot
#1676145894
rpmqa fc39 | wc -l
#1676145909
dnf repolist enabled
#1676145926
dnf config-manager --set-disabled rawhide
#1676145949
dnf config-manager --set-enabled fedora updates updates-testing
#1676145958
dnf repolist all
#1676145975
rpmqa fedora
#1676146046
dnf install --releasever=38 fedora-release fedora-release-common
fedora-release-identity-basic fedora-repos fedora-gpg-keys
#1676146075
dnf downgrade --releasever=38 fedora-release fedora-release-common
fedora-release-identity-basic fedora-repos fedora-gpg-keys
#1676146091
dnf repolist all
#1676146103
rpmqa fc39
#1676146297
dnf clean all
#1676146303
dnf makecache
#1676146574
time dnf upgrade
#1676146608
time dnf upgrade --releasever=38
#1676146959
rpmqa fc38
#1676146964
rpmqa fc39
#1676146968
rpmqa fc37
#
# cat /usr/local/bin/dnfpre.sh38
#!/bin/bash
time dnf upgrade --releasever=38 dnf* rpm* libsol* glib* systemd* fedor* dracu* hawk*
# alias | grep rpm
alias rpmqa='rpm -qa | sort | grep $*'
alias rpmqf='rpm -qf '
# alias | grep df
alias df='df --exclude-type=tmpfs --exclude-type=devtmpfs --exclude-type=cgroup '
alias dfh='df -h '
--
Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion,
based on faith, not based on science.
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata
8:11 p.m.
On 2/12/23 4:50 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 15:09 (UTC-0800):
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 09:22 (UTC-0800):
>>> My attempts to upgrade landed me in Rawhide instead of Branched.
>> My last one, on a Core2Duo, did too, but I caught it right away and fixed the
repo
>> configs with dnf config-manager IIRC followed by simply dnf upgrade
>> --releasever=38 --skip-broken. There was one new package that makes kernel
locking
>> more complicated.
> Can you elaborate on what you did?
Not with any more detail than contained in the relevant period in .bash_history. A *lot*
has transpired in the mean time.
[snip]
Thanks,
I just now did a fresh install of the latest branched version, and the
repos are still pointing to rawhide.
I'm gonna let it go for now. None of this is on a production machine,
anyway.
3:30 a.m.
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 18:11 (UTC-0800):
I just now did a fresh install of the latest branched version, and
the
repos are still pointing to rawhide.
I'm gonna let it go for now. None of this is on a production
machine,
anyway.
I just did a system-upgrade to 38 branch on another PC. When it was all over, I
tried dnf makecache followed by dnf upgrade. The proposal was to upgrade 6 fedora*
packages to 39-0.1 versions. For now I've simply added fedora-re*39* to exclude=
in dnf.conf.
# dnf repolist enabled
repo id
repo name
fedora
Fedora rawhide - x86_64
fedora-cisco-openh264
Fedora rawhide openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64
updates
Fedora rawhide - x86_64 - Updates
updates-testing
Fedora rawhide - x86_64 - Test Updates
# rpmqa fedora-re
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 4
Header V4 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 8898875c: BAD
Header SHA1 digest: OK
fedora-release-38-0.23.noarch
fedora-release-common-38-0.23.noarch
fedora-release-identity-basic-38-0.23.noarch
fedora-repos-38-0.4.noarch
fedora-repos-rawhide-38-0.4.noarch
# grep RETT /etc/os-release
PRETTY_NAME="Fedora Linux 38 (Rawhide Prerelease)"
#
--
Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion,
based on faith, not based on science.
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata
10:29 a.m.
On 2/13/23 1:30 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 18:11 (UTC-0800):
> I just now did a fresh install of the latest branched version, and the
> repos are still pointing to rawhide.
> I'm gonna let it go for now. None of this is on a production machine,
> anyway.
I just did a system-upgrade to 38 branch on another PC. When it was all over, I
tried dnf makecache followed by dnf upgrade. The proposal was to upgrade 6 fedora*
packages to 39-0.1 versions. For now I've simply added fedora-re*39* to exclude=
in dnf.conf.
Yeah, sounds like we've got a bug.
5:15 p.m.
On Mon, 2023-02-13 at 08:29 -0800, Scott Beamer wrote:
On 2/13/23 1:30 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
> Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 18:11 (UTC-0800):
>
> > I just now did a fresh install of the latest branched version, and the
> > repos are still pointing to rawhide.
> > I'm gonna let it go for now. None of this is on a production machine,
> > anyway.
> I just did a system-upgrade to 38 branch on another PC. When it was all over, I
> tried dnf makecache followed by dnf upgrade. The proposal was to upgrade 6 fedora*
> packages to 39-0.1 versions. For now I've simply added fedora-re*39* to
exclude=
> in dnf.conf.
>
Yeah, sounds like we've got a bug.
Well, it's not so much a bug as we haven't been able to do a second
Branched compose. The first one didn't get the updated fedora-release
and fedora-repos; the second one should, but we haven't been able to do
a compose for days because of the s390x outage holding up builds that
we needed to get a compose done.
We should hopefully be able to get a compose through by end of today.
In the meantime you can just update to the latest fedora-release and
fedora-repos packages from Koji if you like.
--
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw(a)fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net
9:17 a.m.
On 2/13/2023 3:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2023-02-13 at 08:29 -0800, Scott Beamer wrote:
> On 2/13/23 1:30 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
>> Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 18:11 (UTC-0800):
>>
>>> I just now did a fresh install of the latest branched version, and the
>>> repos are still pointing to rawhide.
>>> I'm gonna let it go for now. None of this is on a production machine,
>>> anyway.
>> I just did a system-upgrade to 38 branch on another PC. When it was all over, I
>> tried dnf makecache followed by dnf upgrade. The proposal was to upgrade 6
fedora*
>> packages to 39-0.1 versions. For now I've simply added fedora-re*39* to
exclude=
>> in dnf.conf.
>>
> Yeah, sounds like we've got a bug.
Well, it's not so much a bug as we haven't been able to do a second
Branched compose. The first one didn't get the updated fedora-release
and fedora-repos; the second one should, but we haven't been able to do
a compose for days because of the s390x outage holding up builds that
we needed to get a compose done.
We should hopefully be able to get a compose through by end of today.
In the meantime you can just update to the latest fedora-release and
fedora-repos packages from Koji if you like.
Yep. It's all good now. Thanks.
433
days inactive
436
days old
8 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Adam Williamson -
Felix Miata -
Scott Beamer