Re: install question: which cd's

[Roger Grosswiler]

ah, btw, is there a logic about the content of the several disks??

rog

shorter: thx :-D
Rog

>  The shorter answer:
>
>  1 and 2
>
>  V
>
>  On 11/25/05, Roger Grosswiler <roger(a)gwch.net&gt; wrote:
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > just a short question:
> >
> > which cd's are needed for a default installation?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roger
> >
> > --
> > fedora-test-list mailing list
> > fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
> > To unsubscribe:
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
> >
>  --
>  fedora-test-list mailing list
>  fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
>  To unsubscribe:
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

install question: which cd's

[John Reiser]

>  ah, btw, is there a logic about the content of the several disks??
It saves time (and CDs) if the most frequent installs take the
fewest disks.  Frequently it has been the case that the default
package selection can be installed using only the first two CDs.
A previous post in this thread says that FC5test1 works this way.

However, I added system tools, software development, and x11 software
development (but not GNOME development, not KDE development, not
legacy software development) to the default list.  The installer
requested all 5 CDs on x86_64.  It looked to me as if at most
1 package was required from both the fourth and the fifth CD-ROM,
and it seems to me that such package placement could be improved.

--

install question: which cd's

[John Summerfield]

John Reiser wrote:
> >ah, btw, is there a logic about the content of the several
> disks??
>  
>  
>  It saves time (and CDs) if the most frequent installs take the
>  fewest disks.  Frequently it has been the case that the default
>  package selection can be installed using only the first two CDs.
>  A previous post in this thread says that FC5test1 works this way.
>  
>  However, I added system tools, software development, and x11 software
>  development (but not GNOME development, not KDE development, not
>  legacy software development) to the default list.  The installer
>  requested all 5 CDs on x86_64.  It looked to me as if at most
>  1 package was required from both the fourth and the fifth CD-ROM,
>  and it seems to me that such package placement could be improved.
>   
by doing a few network installs from an http server and using the logs 
to inform the build process.



-- 

Cheers
John

-- spambait
1aaaaaaa(a)computerdatasafe.com.au  Z1aaaaaaa(a)computerdatasafe.com.au
Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/

do not reply off-list

install question: which cd's

[Clyde E. Kunkel]

John Reiser wrote:
> > ah, btw, is there a logic about the content of the several
> disks??
>  
>  It saves time (and CDs) if the most frequent installs take the
>  fewest disks.  Frequently it has been the case that the default
>  package selection can be installed using only the first two CDs.
>  A previous post in this thread says that FC5test1 works this way.
>   
Yes, it does work that way, just don't unselect any of the default 
selections else you get an unhandled exception.

-- 
Regards,

Old Fart

install question: which cd's

[Jeremy Katz]

On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 07:41 -0800, John Reiser wrote:
>  However, I added system tools, software development, and x11
> software
>  development (but not GNOME development, not KDE development, not
>  legacy software development) to the default list.  The installer
>  requested all 5 CDs on x86_64.  It looked to me as if at most
>  1 package was required from both the fourth and the fifth CD-ROM,
>  and it seems to me that such package placement could be improved. 
I expect some improvements will be made before the release is done given
that we only got CD installs working again a week and a half ago ;-)

I'm just glad that the default install only ended up needing two right
now :P

Jeremy