Package not fedup'd

[Ed Greshko]

I tested a fedup from f18-->f20 and noted that some packages were not upgraded.  One, in particular, was apper.

Is this to be expected?

[Ed Greshko]

On 12/04/13 20:58, Ed Greshko wrote:
> I tested a fedup from f18-->f20 and noted that some packages were not upgraded.  One, in particular, was apper.
>
> Is this to be expected?

Never mind.....   Eyes going bad.  Just noticed the version of apper in current f18 is greater than apper in f20.

[Michael Cronenworth]

Ed Greshko wrote:
> Never mind.....   Eyes going bad.  Just noticed the version of apper in current f18 is greater than apper in f20.

This is a bug that the maintainer needs to fix by pushing an F20 update. Can you 
file a bug for this?

[Ed Greshko]

On 12/04/13 22:19, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Ed Greshko wrote:
> > Never mind.....   Eyes going bad.  Just noticed the version of apper in current f18 is greater than apper in f20.
>
> This is a bug that the maintainer needs to fix by pushing an F20 update. Can you file a bug for this?

OK....   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038324

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 08:19 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Ed Greshko wrote:
> > Never mind.....   Eyes going bad.  Just noticed the version of apper in current f18 is greater than apper in f20.
>
> This is a bug that the maintainer needs to fix by pushing an F20 update. Can you 
> file a bug for this?

Well, F20 is frozen, so so they may have built and submitted an update
but it can't go stable because of the freeze...

[Michael Cronenworth]

Adam Williamson wrote:
> Well, F20 is frozen, so so they may have built and submitted an update
> but it can't go stable because of the freeze...

I checked Bodhi before sending my email. There was no update submitted, but 
there is one now thanks to Ed's bug report.