system-config-printer branch for Fedora 11

[Domingo Becker]

Which system-config-printer branch will be used for Fedora 11 ?

By the way, in DL [1] there's a 1.1.x branch which is not in Transifex
[2] (unless I'm looking at a cached page).


[1] http://translate.fedoraproject.org/module/system-config-printer

[2] https://translate.fedoraproject.org/submit/module/system-config-printer


kind regards

Domingo Becker

[Tim Waugh]

On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 12:51 -0300, Domingo Becker wrote:
>  Which system-config-printer branch will be used for Fedora 11 ?
>  
>  By the way, in DL [1] there's a 1.1.x branch which is not in Transifex
>  [2] (unless I'm looking at a cached page).
>  
>  
>  [1] http://translate.fedoraproject.org/module/system-config-printer
>  
>  [2] https://translate.fedoraproject.org/submit/module/system-config-printer 
Hi,

The 1.1.x branch will be used for Fedora 11.

I'm not sure why Transifex is not showing the 1.1.x branch yet.

Tim.
*/

[Piotr Drąg]

Tim Waugh pisze:
>  The 1.1.x branch will be used for Fedora 11.
>  
>  I'm not sure why Transifex is not showing the 1.1.x branch yet.
>   
That's because Transifex configuration can be modified only by admins 
currently. We use bug #462358 to coordinate DL and Tx configurations. 
Now it seems that Dimitris hasn't got much time, and this changes are 
waiting to be applied:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462358#c10

-- 
Piotr Drąg
http://raven.pmail.pl

[Igor Pires Soares]

 Em Qui, 2009-01-15 às 16:15 +0000, Tim Waugh escreveu: 
>  On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 12:51 -0300, Domingo Becker wrote:
>  > Which system-config-printer branch will be used for Fedora 11 ?
>  > 
>  > By the way, in DL [1] there's a 1.1.x branch which is not in Transifex
>  > [2] (unless I'm looking at a cached page).
>  > 
>  > 
>  > [1] http://translate.fedoraproject.org/module/system-config-printer
>  > 
>  > [2] https://translate.fedoraproject.org/submit/module/system-config-printer
>  
>  Hi,
>  
>  The 1.1.x branch will be used for Fedora 11.
>  
>  I'm not sure why Transifex is not showing the 1.1.x branch yet.
>  
>  Tim.
>  */ 
 
Dimitris added 1.1.x during L10N meeting today. Is there any branches we
can remove now? Currently, Tx also has support for 0.7.32.x, 0.7.82.x,
1.0.x and master branches. I guess the first two were for obsoleted
Fedora versions.

Regards,
Igor Pires Soares

[Tim Waugh]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Igor Pires Soares wrote:
| Dimitris added 1.1.x during L10N meeting today. Is there any branches we
| can remove now? Currently, Tx also has support for 0.7.32.x, 0.7.82.x,
| 1.0.x and master branches. I guess the first two were for obsoleted
| Fedora versions.

Exactly right.  The only branches we need at the moment are 1.0.x,
1.1.x, and master.

Thanks,
Tim.
*/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFJgCNmaSWRox63mSMRAgo+AJ495bdjlWW6atdmCGhomRwzkLtw4gCeMnDZ
> rbKe5Vjx1t4CgWRT6zuglbU=
> =s7+Z
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Dimitris Glezos]

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Tim Waugh <twaugh(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  The only branches we need at the moment are 1.0.x,
>  1.1.x, and master. 
Done.

-d


-- 
Dimitris Glezos
Jabber ID: glezos(a)jabber.org, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B
http://dimitris.glezos.com/

"He who gives up functionality for ease of use
loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous)
--