>>> If so, is that moving to an existing zanata instance that is being
>>> run for us? Or is that talking about fedora infrastructure creating
>>> such an instance?
>> I've added this item in the list , and will keep you in the loop.
I had the meetup with zanata team. The instance is created on openshift.
Any resource will be supplied by zanata team so far.
I am updating the plan and will update all soonish.
(2014年07月12日 03:20), Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:48:42 +1000
> Noriko Mizumoto <noriko(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> Btw, unless Infrastructure team needs to track this discussion for
>> some maintenance reason, can we discuss at trans list only as many of
>> translators have not subscribed infrastructure list?
> Thats fine with me for the most part, but one final question here:
Kevin, no need to be final question, rather I like to hear any concern
I just do not wish to let any discussion go on and decision to be made
for this issue at Infra at lists without majority of translators.
> From the discussion it looks like moving to zanata is coming out as the
> best plan moving forward?
Some packages have already used zanata, as well some fedora books
authors (docs team) have also used zanata. Therefore many of translators
are familiar with zanata than any other tool. I see a number of people
supporting zanata in this list as well trans at lists.
I will make sure that translators do reach the consensus on this.
> If so, is that moving to an existing zanata instance that is being run
> for us? Or is that talking about fedora infrastructure creating such an
I've added this item in the list , and will keep you in the loop.
> I'm fine with us moving to a hosted instance if translators and
> websites folks all agree that is the best way forward, but I am not
> really comfortable running our own instance.
Let me ask a few things here.
Should we include websites team for discussion?
You are saying 'not comfortable', does that mean not enough resource on