Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: I can not install latest Adobe flash player on Fedora 10. It gives me these errors.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497443
Summary: I can not install latest Adobe flash player on Fedora 10. It gives me these errors. Product: Fedora Localization Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Japanese [ja] AssignedTo: noriko@redhat.com ReportedBy: austinmaeda@gmail.com QAContact: noriko@redhat.com CC: fedora-trans-ja@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Description of problem: I can not install latest Adobe flash player on Fedora 10. It gives me these errors.
Error Type: <type 'exceptions.UnicodeDecodeError'> Error Value: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe3 in position 69: ordinal not in range(128) File : /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/rpmtrans.py, line 376, in callback self._instProgress( bytes, total, h ) File : /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/rpmtrans.py, line 457, in _instProgress self.complete_actions, self.total_actions) File : /usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py, line 2187, in event self._showName(self.info_actions[action]) File : /usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py, line 2180, in _showName self.base.package(package_id, status, self.curpkg.summary) File : /usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py, line 230, in package PackageKitBaseBackend.package(self, package_id, status, summary) File : /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/packagekit/backend.py, line 109, in package print >> sys.stdout, "package\t$s\t$s\t$s" $ (status, package_id, summary)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497443
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tagoh@redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(austinmaeda@gmail | |.com)
--- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2009-04-23 20:46:48 EDT --- Can you explain more how did you try to install the package? and can you reproduce it with other packages that way?
If it's not a package-specific issue, this might be a bug in PackageKit or yum. otherwise in that package. which isn't shipped in Fedora.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497443
austinmaeda@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(austinmaeda@gmail | |.com) |
--- Comment #2 from austinmaeda@gmail.com 2009-04-24 01:59:17 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341089) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341089) This is the screen shot of the error I get.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497443
--- Comment #3 from austinmaeda@gmail.com 2009-04-24 02:02:32 EDT --- Yes I can reproduce the problem.
I downloaded the RPM package flash-plugin-10.0.22.87-release.i386.rpm from the Adobe web site, then double clicked this file to install, then I always get this error.
Error Type: <type 'exceptions.UnicodeDecodeError'> Error Value: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe3 in position 69: ordinal not in range(128) File : /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/rpmtrans.py, line 376, in callback self._instProgress( bytes, total, h ) File : /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/rpmtrans.py, line 457, in _instProgress self.complete_actions, self.total_actions) File : /usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py, line 2187, in event self._showName(self.info_actions[action]) File : /usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py, line 2180, in _showName self.base.package(package_id, status, self.curpkg.summary) File : /usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py, line 230, in package PackageKitBaseBackend.package(self, package_id, status, summary) File : /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/packagekit/backend.py, line 109, in package print >> sys.stdout, "package\t$s\t$s\t$s" $ (status, package_id, summary)
I will attach the screen shot in Jpeg file.
Thank you.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497443
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ffesti@redhat.com, | |james.antill@redhat.com, | |pmatilai@redhat.com, | |skvidal@sethdot.org, | |tim.lauridsen@googlemail.co | |m Component|Japanese [ja] |yum Version|unspecified |10 AssignedTo|noriko@redhat.com |skvidal@sethdot.org Product|Fedora Localization |Fedora QAContact|noriko@redhat.com |extras-qa@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2009-04-24 05:14:11 EDT --- Reassigning to yum so far.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497443
seth vidal svidal@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lmacken@redhat.com, | |richard@hughsie.com, | |smparrish@gmail.com, | |svidal@redhat.com Component|yum |PackageKit AssignedTo|skvidal@sethdot.org |richard@hughsie.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497443
Richard Hughes rhughes@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhughes@redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?
--- Comment #5 from Richard Hughes rhughes@redhat.com 2009-04-24 11:09:37 EDT --- Ahh, we've fixed a similar bug in F11 -- any chance you could try the f11-beta live CD and see if the problem is fixed there? If it is, then I can backport fix. Thanks.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497443
austinmaeda@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? |
--- Comment #6 from austinmaeda@gmail.com 2009-04-26 23:27:46 EDT --- I will wait for F11 then install them. It will be out soon in May right?
Thanks.
Austin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497443
TK009 john.brown009@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |john.brown009@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from TK009 john.brown009@gmail.com 2009-04-29 02:11:36 EDT --- I just tried this in F11 with using the steps described by austin and received no errors, installed successfully. Same version of flash 'flash-plugin-10.0.22.87-release.i386.rpm'.
PackageKit-0.4.6-8.fc11.i586
Based on Richard's comment, I am assigning.
TK009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497443
Richard Hughes rhughes@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
trans-ja@lists.fedoraproject.org