[Bug 657716] New: New translation team
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: New translation team
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657716
Summary: New translation team
Product: Fedora Localization
Version: unspecified
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: l10n-requests
AssignedTo: dimitris(a)glezos.com
ReportedBy: mohar.darko(a)gmail.com
QAContact: aalam(a)redhat.com
CC: piotrdrag(a)gmail.com, fedora(a)couf.be,
diegobz(a)gmail.com, fedora-trans-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
I would like to create a new Fedora Slovenia translation team.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 11 months
[Bug 800846] New: [cs_CZ] There are missing translations in yum
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [cs_CZ] There are missing translations in yum
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800846
Summary: [cs_CZ] There are missing translations in yum
Product: Fedora Localization
Version: unspecified
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: Other language
AssignedTo: dimitris(a)glezos.com
ReportedBy: pschindl(a)redhat.com
QAContact: aalam(a)redhat.com
CC: piotrdrag(a)gmail.com, fedora-trans-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Description of problem:
During the installation (or remove or so) I can see this:
...
========================================
Package Arch ... <---
========================================
Shrnutí transakce
========================================
Remove 1 Balíček <---
...
Test transakce v pořádku
Transakce spuštěna
Odstranění : system-config-language-1.3.5-9.fc17.noarch
Verifying : system-config-language-1.3.5-9.fc17.noarch <---
...
Words like Remove, Package and Verifying are still in English, should be in
Czech
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
yum-3.4.3-18.fc17.noarch
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install something with yum (for example run 'yum install vim'
Actual results:
Some words aren't translated
Expected results:
Everything should be in Czech
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 11 months
[Bug 768731] New: Transifex file submissions disable f14 and enable f16
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Transifex file submissions disable f14 and enable f16
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768731
Summary: Transifex file submissions disable f14 and enable f16
Product: Fedora Localization
Version: unspecified
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: l10n-requests
AssignedTo: dimitris(a)glezos.com
ReportedBy: guillermo.gomez(a)gmail.com
QAContact: aalam(a)redhat.com
CC: piotrdrag(a)gmail.com, fedora(a)couf.be,
diegobz(a)gmail.com, fedora-trans-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Description of problem:
This to request that Transifex file submissions be disabled for the f14 branch
and enabled for the new f16 branch for Software Management Guide book.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 11 months
[Bug 809199] New: fedora-release-notes for F17
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: fedora-release-notes for F17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809199
Summary: fedora-release-notes for F17
Product: Fedora Localization
Version: unspecified
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: l10n-requests
AssignedTo: dimitris(a)glezos.com
ReportedBy: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
QAContact: aalam(a)redhat.com
CC: piotrdrag(a)gmail.com, fedora(a)couf.be,
diegobz(a)gmail.com, fedora-trans-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Please disable f16 in transifex and enable f17
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 7 months
Is the FLSCo running our teams alone?
by Kévin Raymond
Hi there,
We get some requests about creating new teams, changing coordinators,
dealing with maintainers, transifex…
The ones really able to take actions are the FLSCo members[0], right?
We didn't have any election since Spring 2008 (Fedora 9), and I can
read "From time to time, at least once every 3 Fedora releases, the
entire membership of FLSCo will stand for re-election".
You've done lots of work, but there is more do to. There will always
be. If it's fine for you, that works.
Spending lots of time helping new translators and maintainers, I think
that I could help the FLP more by joining the FLSCo. This is more a
request than an application as what I am actually doing does not need
really need an official status (yeah translators, you could help us
all!). I am actually one of the Fedora Project maintainers at
transifex.net, but don't think that I should approve/cancel new team
creation for example. I also try not to do too much, as people start
referring to me for really specific questions, that IMHO only rely to
the FLSCo (like team creation, changing teams coordinator…)
What's your opinion? I am sure many translators don't even know that
we have a steering committee.
[0] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N_Steering_Committee
--
Kévin Raymond
(shaiton)
GPG-Key: A5BCB3A2
11 years, 8 months
Guide editing workflow: How to efficiently work with docs, translators and publishers
by Kévin Raymond
Heya!
Short summary: Discussing before switching the translation system of some
guides.
After spending many hours in the merge issue between our old teams and the
transifex.net ones, it is still an active task.
Thanks to involved contributors, it is moving forward, there are already some
projects fully merged.
Willing to help with the IQSG (installation quick start guide), I noticed an
issue in the transifex config[1], which leads me to a zanata config file and the
corresponding git commits.
A bit of history.
A while back, we were using our own Transifex instance, which was not sticking
to the upstream releases. It was a mess with projects unavailable and other
issues.
There were 2 solutions:
- Migrating to transifex.net, the online hosted service maintained by the
Transifex team,
- Moving to an other system (in our infra or somewhere else).
Some wanted to try Zanata. There where a RH instance set for this purpose[2].
After many discussions, it has been decided to move all our projects to
transifex.net.
Few upstream projects choose for specific reasons to move to an other service,
and even to Zanata (1 or 2). And few others just stops dealing with translations.
Yes, changing the translation platform is a pain for both, maintainers and
translators.
Nowadays, we are close to have fully integrated all projects to transifex.net
(still some merge concerning docs[3]).
So here we are, with translations done through transifex.net for the projects
correctly set up, the other one needs attention ([4]?).
/end of history
The IQSG is not correctly set up.
But we just saw on the git log
"* fb03c3c Adding zanata config file"
this is… weird without other notice.
On the Zanata instance, we could see:
Description Creation Date Status
Fedora Installation Quick Start Guide 19 juin 2012 Active
Fedora Installation Guide 19 juin 2012 Active
I just asked more info on IRC, and it appears that we need to discuss/define how
we deal with our translation platform, and let our maintainers explain why they
need to move somewhere else.
nb has reverted the ZANATA commits in the above guides, to avoid mistakes.
@maintainers, could you please explain your needs/wishes?
Cheers,
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836383
[2] https://translate.zanata.org/zanata/
[3] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/2012-June/014356.html
[4] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/2012-June/014420.html
--
Kévin Raymond
(Shaiton)
11 years, 8 months
Merging transifex.net duplicated teams
by Kévin Raymond
Hi there,
Since our migration to transifex.net, some teams have lost their
translations because a new team was created (thanks to language mapping
in transifex.net).
There are still some project that need to be merged.
I've written a script[1] used to parse all guides at TXN, and print the
language code which have translations but are not associated to any
teams.
Please find attached the results.
Limitations:
- it was against the fedora-docs release only, not against
all docs! I could have used an other script for that.
I have it around but I would prefer our guides to be on
the fedora-docs release. This refers to[3].
Should I add all in this fedora-docs release? I think so, but
we never finished that…
Should I add all in this fedora-docs release? I think so, but
we never finished that…
There could be an other way, but I think that I've more than needed.
This list should be checked with the Misha's one[2].
we really need the maintainers to act!
Some guides are completly translated but using the wrong language code,
we can't publish nor re-use translations.
I think we need a clear list of which l_code have to be merged in which
one, the thread [2] should helps.
@maintainers, please ask if you need help for that!
[1] https://gitorious.org/tiny-scripts/transifex/trees/master/check_teams
[2] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/2011-August/013611.html
[3] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/2012-March/014116.html
--
Kévin Raymond
(Shaiton)
11 years, 9 months
Introduction
by Israel Torres
Hello, everybody. My name's Israel and I speak Spanish.
Now, about me:
*Name*: Israel Torres
*Country*: Mexico
*Login*: dnlsrl
*Translation Language*: English
*Profession*: IT Dept. Chief
*About me*: I write blogs, translate whatever I find and lose a lot of time
researching about how to use linux deeper.
*GPG KeyID*: D04C7C80
*GPG Fingerprint*: 11CF C20E F9FE CD57 A600 2CDF 9875 BCDA D04C 7C80
--
*.::dnlsrl::.*
Follow me on Twitter! *@dnlsrl <http://www.twitter.com/dnlsrl>*
http://knowurpc.wordpress.com/ <http://knowurpc.wordpress.com/>
*Saludos, Israel Torres.*
11 years, 10 months
anaconda translations in F17
by Domingo Becker
Something went wrong with Anaconda translations, and before filing a
bug report I want to ask you if the Spanish translations is the only
one affected.
I remember I have tested Anaconda in April, 5th [1], and everything
went fine as I said in the Test Results, but in the F17 GA x86_64 DVD,
I see the buttons Back and Next, which surprises me because those two
buttons labels were translated many releases ago!
There are also many, many other untranslated strings (please read my
test results, I always participate in anaconda translations and
testing).
Do you translators see the same results in other languages?
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-04-05_L10n_I18n_Installation
kind regards
Domingo Becker
11 years, 10 months
