On 09/10/2011 08:33 PM, Cheng-Chia Tseng wrote:
I think that it at least has one advantage.
For example, we can deliver new translatins more frequently, while the
package does not plan to issue newer releases in that period.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Piotr Drąg<piotrdrag(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/9/9 Ankitkumar Rameshchandra Patel<ankit(a)redhat.com>:
>> Related note. How about we also change the way we manage translations
>> for packages?
>>
>> Shouldn't we have translations packaged independently from RPM packages?
>>
>
> Please don't do it. We had this discussion a couple of times already.
> It's not worth it, it most probably won't work.
>
> --
> Piotr Drąg
>
http://raven.fedorapeople.org/
> --
> trans mailing list
> trans(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
In short, translators will have greater control over their translations
and developers will have less burden of dealing with translations.
To know more about advantages and the thread:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-September/156674.html
/Ankit
--
Regards,
Ankit Patel
http://www.ankit644.com/