Re: to add or not ... relnotes

[Paul W. Frields]

On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 16:24 +1000, Murray McAllister wrote:
>  On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade
> <kwade(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  > We discussed adding the changes from the wiki to the release notes,
>  >  given the extra timing for the release.
>  >
>  >  Unfortunately, we also told L10n to go ahead and work with the POT/PO
>  >  from _before_ any changes.
>  >
>  >  Since we didn't do those changes and a week has passed ...
>  >
>  >  * Do we want to do those changes?
>  >  * What about branching for F9 *right now* with what we have?
>  >   - We could make devel available for updates and new trans
>  >   - If we reach parity with F9 for translation, we update the F9 branch
>  >  from devel
>  >  * Other ideas?
>  >
>  >  - Karsten
>  >  --
>  >  Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr.
>  >  Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
>  >  Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
>  >  gpg key : AD0E0C41
>  >
>  
>  Wouldn't it be better to keep the translations that are 100%, at 100%,
>  instead of adding new stuff now, and possibly risk having incomplete
>  translations... 
I think that unfinished translations are less of a risk than faulty
information.  Honestly, there are probably *not* a lot of changes, and
the teams with 100% finished translations will not have a hard time
processing a small number of changes.  I think swift action probably
makes more sense than worrying about the extra strings.

Who will be responsible for putting these changes in?

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug