On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Kévin Raymond
<shaiton(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
I've read your answer about the zanata project.
I am still trying to clean our Fedora projects at TXN[1].
I've some bugzilla ticket around that would help. I still need to fill
lots about maintainers missing, but I don't have so much time ;).
Hi Kévin,
I think what you're doing is admirable. So important. {deep bow}
I still have one question:
For projects not under any fedora releases (-web, -docs, -upstream nor
-main), should we create an other release like "fedora-archive" for
all projects under the Fedora Project hub but not currently in
translations? That would be projects under[2]. Those projects are for
example old guide really out to date that we don't want/need
translators to translate. of course, one project should be only in one
release.
It's not clear to me what types of projects these are. If they are
projects which Fedora is not upstream for but are translated through
FTP, then maybe fedora-external is a good name. Stuff which are not
being translated because they are obsolete could be simply removed.
Moreover, is there a quick way to go straight to the project page
once
we are browsing a release? I mean, at [3] for example, we have all
resources in one page. It's far better if we want to translate the
burning iso guide for example to go at its own page[4]. In idea, on
the "actions_popup" div, that would be great to have a direct link to
its project page. (I should probably ask that with the suggestion
tool…).
Actually, translators probably just want to click one of the rows of
the table and not go to the project page. For example:
https://fedora.transifex.net/projects/p/fedora/r/fedora-docs/l/el/
Furthermore, as you found out, the resource_action popup has a link to
the project details page, at the top side.
-d
--
Dimitris Glezos
Social Localization Crowdsourcing
http://www.transifex.com/ --
http://angel.co/transifex