2010/11/10 Piotr Drąg <piotrdrag(a)gmail.com>:
2010/11/10 Yuri Chornoivan <yurchor(a)ukr.net>:
> написане Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:30:26 +0200, Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com>:
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 06:46:34PM +0200, Yuri Chornoivan wrote:
>>> Fedora Transifex is almost completely broken. Please use webgit to
>>> download catalogues:
>>>
>>>
http://git.fedorahosted.org/git?p=fedora-web.git;a=blob_plain;f=fedorapro...
>>>
>> And pushes? I got an complain from public about a typo on main web page,
>> thus
>> I wanted to fix it.
>
> Pushes work... sometimes (if you have enough patience).
>
I've cleaned this particular module's cache and it should work for now.
Something is broken though and we need someone knowing Tx to look into
this. Modules are not refreshing for weeks, there are HTTP Errors 408
and Page not founds everywhere, submitting rarely works. Maybe it
hasn't got enough resources or something, I don't know, I'm not a
developer nor a sysadmin.
It seems that a script to refresh/clean the module's cache is not
working from cron for some reason.
I've been talking about this issue to diegobz at #fedora-latam-rpmdev
and he said we should ping fedora-admin guys at the appropriate
channel.
If they can't solve the issue, they will ask upstream (diegobz and
glezos), and they will help solving it.
I think we need to have a wiki page to explain translators how to ask
for help to fedora-admin people about Transifex issues. Perhaps it
exists, but nobody seems to find it.
It would also be just awesome if we could update to 0.9.2 release
[1],
but it appears no one have time and knowledge to do this, since it's
harder then updating the packages [2]. I know upstream developers are
very busy. I just wish they could find some time for us to guide us
through it. But for this to happen, we need to update Transifex
packages in Fedora and EPEL first. Domingo, do you need any help to
push the updates?
I needed a packager a month and a half ago.
But finally, I submitted myself the packages for review [1], a month
later than the problem was identified and solved [2], so I'm becoming
a Fedora packager now.
Fedora build system has it's own time.
So we have to wait a little bit more, until the packages reach the repos.
The tracking bug is the one for Transifex update [3].
Django-south has concluded [4].
django-addons [5] and django-threadedcomments [6] are on their way to
the repos. They have been approved and the SCM request is in progress.
django-ajax-selects [7] and django-staticfiles [8] are still under review.
Once the dependencies are finished, Transifex [3] package will be
rebuilt, and I'll be able to test it once more, to make sure we didn't
break anything in the process.
Then, fedora-admin guys will use these packages to upgrade Transifex
right out of the Fedora-EPEL repos.
After we have t.fp.o running Tx 0.9.1, I will start working to upgrade
it to 0.9.2.
I hope things will be easier from then on.
[1]
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2389#comment:42
[2]
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2389#comment:27
[3]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645752
[4]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645759
[5]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645764
[6]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645761
[7]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645760
[8]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645762
kind regards
Domingo Becker (es)