Re: Transifex "cs" vs. "cs_CZ"
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Dimitris Glezos wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Piotr Drąg <piotrdrag at gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> 2011/3/1 Dimitris Glezos <glezos at indifex.com>:
>>> We should use one language team; it will make things much easier (ie
>>> not have to administrate two memberships etc). I guess the correct one
>>> is cs.. this is the standard Czech locale, right?
>>
>> Yes. The problem is that Publican uses XML language codes (cs_CZ,
>> uk_UA etc.), and software uses only cs, uk etc locales. The right
>> solution would be linking cs_CZ and cs-CZ translations with cs team.
>
> I think Publican (or the Fedora toolchain around it) should be adapted
> to support cs.
>
>> Do you want us to file a ticket on this?
>
> We could have a ticket filed. Fwiw, support for multiple languages per
> team is quite a big change in the codebase.
And would it be very hard to constantly mirror the team members to
another
"language"? If it is inevitable, I may start another team for cs_CZ and
ask people to join them both, but surely this is not very comfortable.
> --
> Dimitris Glezos
Adam Pribyl
+1
I think that untill Transifex supports more locales for a team, creating
a new "empty" teams for other locale/language variant and outsourcing
access to the other team/locale is the only working solution.
For illustration, now there is under the fedora project in Transifex.net
currently 'cs' team created, so 'cs_CZ' needs to be created and
outsourced access to it for the 'cs' team. Consequently, 'cs_CZ' will
stay "empty", and the 'cs' team's members will become its members.
If my
understanding of outsourced access is correct.
Josef Hruska