Fedora Core

[Gertjan Vinkesteijn]

Hi,

If you use Fedora Core, please do not try 1.91, but take 1.0 stable. 
Otherwize you might come into a mass of extra trouble.

[Richard Allen]

On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 07:42:48AM +0200, Gertjan Vinkesteijn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you use Fedora Core, please do not try 1.91, but take 1.0 stable. 
> Otherwize you might come into a mass of extra trouble.

I use them both.  The whole reason 1.91 exsists is to test it so you
can be personally involved in making the upcoming Fedora Core 2.0
better, more stable and with less problems.

So if you need a stable workstation or someting like that, go with
Fedora Core 1.
If you feel like contributing your time and efforts to the Fedora
project, dont be afraid of 1.91 or bugzilla :-)

[Lauri Nurmi]

su, 2004-04-04 kello 17:02, Richard Allen kirjoitti:
> On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 07:42:48AM +0200, Gertjan Vinkesteijn wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > If you use Fedora Core, please do not try 1.91, but take 1.0 stable. 
> > Otherwize you might come into a mass of extra trouble.
>
> I use them both.  The whole reason 1.91 exsists is to test it so you
> can be personally involved in making the upcoming Fedora Core 2.0
> better, more stable and with less problems.

Why do you even reply to this Vinkesteijn person? He is just spamming
the list with completely useless messages that are not related to
translation in any way. If we just ignore him, maybe he will keep quiet.

[Gertjan Vinkesteijn]

Lauri Nurmi wrote:
> su, 2004-04-04 kello 17:02, Richard Allen kirjoitti:
> > On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 07:42:48AM +0200, Gertjan Vinkesteijn wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > If you use Fedora Core, please do not try 1.91, but take 1.0 stable. 
> > > Otherwize you might come into a mass of extra trouble.
> >
> > I use them both.  The whole reason 1.91 exsists is to test it so you
> > can be personally involved in making the upcoming Fedora Core 2.0
> > better, more stable and with less problems.
>
> Why do you even reply to this Vinkesteijn person? He is just spamming
> the list with completely useless messages that are not related to
> translation in any way. If we just ignore him, maybe he will keep quiet.
>
> --
> Fedora-trans-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-trans-list

Sorry, but I am serious

[Gertjan Vinkesteijn]

Gertjan Vinkesteijn wrote:
> Lauri Nurmi wrote:
> > su, 2004-04-04 kello 17:02, Richard Allen kirjoitti:
> > > On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 07:42:48AM +0200, Gertjan Vinkesteijn wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > If you use Fedora Core, please do not try 1.91, but take 1.0 
> > > > stable. Otherwize you might come into a mass of extra trouble.
> > >
> > > I use them both.  The whole reason 1.91 exsists is to test it so you
> > > can be personally involved in making the upcoming Fedora Core 2.0
> > > better, more stable and with less problems.
> >
> > Why do you even reply to this Vinkesteijn person? He is just spamming
> > the list with completely useless messages that are not related to
> > translation in any way. If we just ignore him, maybe he will keep quiet.
> >
> > -- 
> > Fedora-trans-list mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-trans-list
>
> Sorry, but I am serious

I hate to reply to this kind of remarks, yes I am dutch, outspoken, and 
not polite, even manic-depressive type one, that is without the D. I 
apology for that. But I always work 110% in honesty, and if you call me 
a spammer than I have thousands of collagues who know me as an honest 
programmer.

To mention a few of developers version nigth mears:
1. The Logitech Mouse problem still has not been completely resolved
2. Among other things, Yum has problems with xemacs on the moment with 
resolving dependencies

Sing with Eric Clapton: If you accuse me, take a look at your self

[Volodymyr M. Lisivka]

нд, 2004-04-04 у 17:02, Richard Allen написав:
> So if you need a stable workstation or someting like that, go with
> Fedora Core 1.
> If you feel like contributing your time and efforts to the Fedora
> project, dont be afraid of 1.91 or bugzilla :-)

I want to contribute my time to Fedora project, but transatlantic
traffic costs to much for me (5$ per CD).

Can anybody create RPM-deltas between FC1 and FC2test2 RPM's?

[Gertjan Vinkesteijn]

Volodymyr M. Lisivka wrote:
> нд, 2004-04-04 у 17:02, Richard Allen написав:
> > So if you need a stable workstation or someting like that, go with
> > Fedora Core 1.
> > If you feel like contributing your time and efforts to the Fedora
> > project, dont be afraid of 1.91 or bugzilla :-)
>
> I want to contribute my time to Fedora project, but transatlantic
> traffic costs to much for me (5$ per CD).
>
> Can anybody create RPM-deltas between FC1 and FC2test2 RPM's?

Look at fedora.redhat.com for mirrors, my yum.conf looks like

[Volodymyr M. Lisivka]

нд, 2004-04-04 у 20:07, Gertjan Vinkesteijn написав:
> Volodymyr M. Lisivka wrote:
> > нд, 2004-04-04 у 17:02, Richard Allen написав:
> > > So if you need a stable workstation or someting like that, go with
> > > Fedora Core 1.
> > > If you feel like contributing your time and efforts to the Fedora
> > > project, dont be afraid of 1.91 or bugzilla :-)
> >
> > I want to contribute my time to Fedora project, but transatlantic
> > traffic costs to much for me (5$ per CD).
> >
> > Can anybody create RPM-deltas between FC1 and FC2test2 RPM's?
>
> Look at fedora.redhat.com for mirrors, my yum.conf looks like

I using apt, there no one Fedora Mirror in my city.
Can you just reduce size of the files required to download by suppling
_patches_ to old RPM's, like was before in normal UNIX world?

[Gertjan Vinkesteijn]

Richard Allen wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 07:42:48AM +0200, Gertjan Vinkesteijn wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > If you use Fedora Core, please do not try 1.91, but take 1.0 stable. 
> > Otherwize you might come into a mass of extra trouble.
>
> I use them both.  The whole reason 1.91 exsists is to test it so you
> can be personally involved in making the upcoming Fedora Core 2.0
> better, more stable and with less problems.
>
> So if you need a stable workstation or someting like that, go with
> Fedora Core 1.
> If you feel like contributing your time and efforts to the Fedora
> project, dont be afraid of 1.91 or bugzilla :-)

On the moment I am fighting with xemacs and libcabba, do you have the 
same on Sun?  :-)