Transifex migration

[Diego Búrigo Zacarão]

Hello all,

Yes, I'm not dead (yet). Just being a bit away. :)

Well... Finally, thanks to the hard work of Domingos Becker, we've got
Transifex 0.9.1
packaged and an instance of it running at
https://translate.stg.fedoraproject.org/ with
some data from the production instance. Yeahh!! Submissions are not working,
but you
already can see what's different from 0.7.x.

Now we enter the last phase of the process, I believe.

I would like to encourage everyone willing to give feedback here to have a
look on what's
been implemented in 0.8.x[1] and 0.9.x[2] versions, so you can understand
some aspects
that will have to change from our current experience with Transifex 0.7.x.

The main major changes are:

* No more Collections. Now you can have releases in projects.
* Project Teams support.

I will not explain how things are working now. I'm assuming you know enough
here. :)
So my suggestion for the new structure based on Transifex 0.9.x is the
following:

Create a main project called 'Fedora' and create all the necessary team in
it.
Outsource the access control of all the other projects (anaconda,
system-config-*,
docs-*, etc..) to the main 'Fedora' project. This way the other projects
will be using
the teams of the main project as a unique and centralized place.

The association of people with the correct team can be done manually.
Everyone
of us can request access to a 'Fedora' project team related to its language.

The releases are going to be mounted under the main 'Fedora' project. You
can have a
idea on how things will work looking at the XFCE[3] instance that even have
some
customizations on the templates.

That's the easiest way I could thought to manage the new workflow without
much pain, if any.

Thoughts?

[1] http://help.transifex.net/technical/releases/0.8.html
[2] http://help.transifex.net/technical/releases/0.9.html
[3] https://translations.xfce.org/


******

I'm going to be away for the next days, so happy new year to everyone and
lets start
2011 with the right leg (as we say here in Brazil). :)

Cya

-- 
Diego Búrigo Zacarão
http://diegobz.net

[Kévin Raymond]

2010/12/31 Diego Búrigo Zacarão <diegobz(a)gmail.com&gt;:
>  Hello all,
>
>  Yes, I'm not dead (yet). Just being a bit away. :)
>
>  Well... Finally, thanks to the hard work of Domingos Becker, we've got
>  Transifex 0.9.1
>  packaged and an instance of it running at
>  https://translate.stg.fedoraproject.org/ with
>  some data from the production instance. Yeahh!! Submissions are not working,
>  but you
>  already can see what's different from 0.7.x.
>
>  Now we enter the last phase of the process, I believe.
>
>  I would like to encourage everyone willing to give feedback here to have a
>  look on what's
>  been implemented in 0.8.x[1] and 0.9.x[2] versions, so you can understand
>  some aspects
>  that will have to change from our current experience with Transifex 0.7.x.
>
>  The main major changes are:
>
>  * No more Collections. Now you can have releases in projects.
>  * Project Teams support.
>
>  I will not explain how things are working now. I'm assuming you know enough
>  here. :)
>  So my suggestion for the new structure based on Transifex 0.9.x is the
>  following:
>
>  Create a main project called 'Fedora' and create all the necessary team in
>  it.
>  Outsource the access control of all the other projects (anaconda,
>  system-config-*,
>  docs-*, etc..) to the main 'Fedora' project. This way the other projects
>  will be using
>  the teams of the main project as a unique and centralized place.
>
>  The association of people with the correct team can be done manually.
>  Everyone
>  of us can request access to a 'Fedora' project team related to its language.
>
>  The releases are going to be mounted under the main 'Fedora' project. You
>  can have a
>  idea on how things will work looking at the XFCE[3] instance that even have
>  some
>  customizations on the templates.
>
>  That's the easiest way I could thought to manage the new workflow without
>  much pain, if any.
>
>  Thoughts?
>
>  [1] http://help.transifex.net/technical/releases/0.8.html
>  [2] http://help.transifex.net/technical/releases/0.9.html
>  [3] https://translations.xfce.org/
>
>
>  ******
>
>  I'm going to be away for the next days, so happy new year to everyone and
>  lets start
>  2011 with the right leg (as we say here in Brazil). :)
>
>  Cya
>
>  --
>  Diego Búrigo Zacarão
>  http://diegobz.net 

Hey, thanks a lot for your work Domingos Becker and Diego!
+1 for creating a project "Fedora" and its associated team.

Look forward to use it :)

-- 
Kévin Raymond (shaiton)
GPG-Key: A5BCB3A2

[Tian Shixiong]

On 12/31/2010 07:33 PM, Kévin Raymond wrote:
>  2010/12/31 Diego Búrigo Zacarão<diegobz(a)gmail.com>:
> > Hello all,
> >  
> > Yes, I'm not dead (yet). Just being a bit away. :)
> >  
> > Well... Finally, thanks to the hard work of Domingos
> Becker, we've got
> > Transifex 0.9.1
> > packaged and an instance of it running at
> > https://translate.stg.fedoraproject.org/ with
> > some data from the production instance. Yeahh!! Submissions are not working,
> > but you
> > already can see what's different from 0.7.x.
> >  
> > Now we enter the last phase of the process, I believe.
> >  
> > I would like to encourage everyone willing to give
> feedback here to have a
> > look on what's
> > been implemented in 0.8.x[1] and 0.9.x[2] versions, so you can understand
> > some aspects
> > that will have to change from our current experience with Transifex 0.7.x.
> >  
> > The main major changes are:
> >  
> > * No more Collections. Now you can have releases in
> projects.
> > * Project Teams support.
> >  
> > I will not explain how things are working now. I'm
> assuming you know enough
> > here. :)
> > So my suggestion for the new structure based on Transifex 0.9.x is the
> > following:
> >  
> > Create a main project called 'Fedora' and create
> all the necessary team in
> > it.
> > Outsource the access control of all the other projects (anaconda,
> > system-config-*,
> > docs-*, etc..) to the main 'Fedora' project. This way the other projects
> > will be using
> > the teams of the main project as a unique and centralized place.
> >  
> > The association of people with the correct team can be
> done manually.
> > Everyone
> > of us can request access to a 'Fedora' project team related to its language.
> >  
> > The releases are going to be mounted under the main
> 'Fedora' project. You
> > can have a
> > idea on how things will work looking at the XFCE[3] instance that even have
> > some
> > customizations on the templates.
> >  
> > That's the easiest way I could thought to manage the
> new workflow without
> > much pain, if any.
> >  
> > Thoughts?
> >  
> > [1] http://help.transifex.net/technical/releases/0.8.html
> > [2] http://help.transifex.net/technical/releases/0.9.html
> > [3] https://translations.xfce.org/
> >  
> >  
> > ******
> >  
> > I'm going to be away for the next days, so happy new
> year to everyone and
> > lets start
> > 2011 with the right leg (as we say here in Brazil). :)
> >  
> > Cya
> >  
> > --
> > Diego Búrigo Zacarão
> > http://diegobz.net 
>  
I am so happy to hear this good news on the coming New
Year's Day!
Thanks all the guys who are migrating transifex to the new version for 
us translators.
We are looking forward to try the new version.

Happy New Year! :)

-- 
Regards,

Tiansworld
Fedora Project Ambassador & Contributor

[Thomas Canniot]

Le 31/12/2010 01:14, Diego Búrigo Zacarão a écrit :
>  Hello all,
>
>  Yes, I'm not dead (yet). Just being a bit away. :)
>
>  Well... Finally, thanks to the hard work of Domingos Becker, we've got
>  Transifex 0.9.1
>  packaged and an instance of it running at
>  https://translate.stg.fedoraproject.org/ with
>  some data from the production instance. Yeahh!! Submissions are not
>  working, but you
>  already can see what's different from 0.7.x.
>
>  Now we enter the last phase of the process, I believe.
>
>  I would like to encourage everyone willing to give feedback here to have
>  a look on what's
>  been implemented in 0.8.x[1] and 0.9.x[2] versions, so you can
>  understand some aspects
>  that will have to change from our current experience with Transifex 0.7.x.
>
>  The main major changes are:
>
>  * No more Collections. Now you can have releases in projects.
>  * Project Teams support.
>
>  I will not explain how things are working now. I'm assuming you know
>  enough here. :)
>  So my suggestion for the new structure based on Transifex 0.9.x is the
>  following:
>
>  Create a main project called 'Fedora' and create all the necessary team
>  in it.
>  Outsource the access control of all the other projects (anaconda,
>  system-config-*,
>  docs-*, etc..) to the main 'Fedora' project. This way the other projects
>  will be using
>  the teams of the main project as a unique and centralized place.
>
>  The association of people with the correct team can be done manually.
>  Everyone
>  of us can request access to a 'Fedora' project team related to its language.
>
>  The releases are going to be mounted under the main 'Fedora' project.
>  You can have a
>  idea on how things will work looking at the XFCE[3] instance that even
>  have some
>  customizations on the templates.
>
>  That's the easiest way I could thought to manage the new workflow
>  without much pain, if any.
>
>  Thoughts?
>
>  [1] http://help.transifex.net/technical/releases/0.8.html
>  [2] http://help.transifex.net/technical/releases/0.9.html
>  [3] https://translations.xfce.org/ 

This is so great !!

Here is a bunch of my already favorite features :

* Weekly notification for maintainers
* Translation Reviews
* Rich Commenting Support
* Project Releases and Removal of Collections
* Lotte Improvements
* Team Sharing
* Project Widgets

I just can't wait to work with it :D

About the staging instance, it seems to work however, it's quite 
difficult to understand what's not working because it is a staging 
instance (and thus, not full Fedora features instance). I mean, there 
are no translations teams, no possibility to login or test a file 
submit. Or maybe we can, but I did not found out where.

With regards,

Thomas

[Domingo Becker]

2010/12/30 Diego Búrigo Zacarão <diegobz(a)gmail.com&gt;:
>  Create a main project called 'Fedora' and create all the necessary team in
>  it.
>  Outsource the access control of all the other projects (anaconda,
>  system-config-*,
>  docs-*, etc..) to the main 'Fedora' project. This way the other projects
>  will be using
>  the teams of the main project as a unique and centralized place.
>  
+1 from Spanish team.

k.r.

Domingo Becker

[Kévin Raymond]

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Domingo Becker <domingobecker(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  2010/12/30 Diego Búrigo Zacarão <diegobz(a)gmail.com&gt;:
> >
> > Create a main project called 'Fedora' and create all the necessary team in
> > it.
> > Outsource the access control of all the other projects (anaconda,
> > system-config-*,
> > docs-*, etc..) to the main 'Fedora' project. This way the other projects
> > will be using
> > the teams of the main project as a unique and centralized place.
> > 
Hi guys,

Is there a way now to work on this staging instance? Do team has been
created and project added?

Many thanks,

-- 
Kévin Raymond (shaiton)
GPG-Key: A5BCB3A2