Transifex version?

[Paul W. Frields]

Hi L10n'ers...

I had some questions about our Fedora Transifex instance, which may be
shown somewhere but I hadn't time to find all the answers.

* Which Tx version is running on translate.fedoraproject.org?

* What's the latest stable code available?

* If those are different, what is the current plan for updating the Tx
  instance in translate.fp.o?  Is that plan on the wiki?

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

[Ricky Zhou]

On 2009-01-14 02:50:09 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>  * Which Tx version is running on translate.fedoraproject.org?
We're currently running transifex-0.3.1-5.el5.

>  * What's the latest stable code available? 
I *think* this
is the latest released version, although Transifex
developers are working on porting to Django now, which we'll have to
look to integrate (mainly FAS authentication).

Thanks,
Ricky

[Dimitris Glezos]

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Ricky Zhou <ricky(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
>  On 2009-01-14 02:50:09 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > * Which Tx version is running on translate.fedoraproject.org?
>  We're currently running transifex-0.3.1-5.el5.
>
> > * What's the latest stable code available?
>  I *think* this is the latest released version, although Transifex
>  developers are working on porting to Django now, which we'll have to
>  look to integrate (mainly FAS authentication). 
Yup, 0.3.1 is the latest version.

  http://transifex.org/files/

Like Ricky said, upgrading to the Django branch might require some
work: installing, migrating data and integrating with FAS. The latter
could be avoided if we choose to use Tx's built-in users management
(GNOME did the same with their L10n infrastructure).

>  Are we planning to replace Damned Lies with Transifex for statistics
> for F11
>  translations? 
I don't think we'll have the time to do that right now. For example,
Transifex statistics don't support intltool-based i18n yet.

>  I'm asking since I know the Django-beta of Transifex has
> statistics. At the
>  same time, Damned Lies upstream has moved to Django and is in production at
>  l10n.gnome.org. If we were to integrate the new Damned Lies we need FAS
>  authentication there as well, and in addition, there would potentially be a
>  bit of work with moving the XML configuration over to the database. 
Giving DL+Dj a try would be a good idea IMO. The idea of the migration
was that it's a good intermediate term towards the long-term merge of
DL and Tx. Starting experimenting with this before migrating to
tx-django sounds like a good roadmap.

-d



-- 
Dimitris Glezos
Jabber ID: glezos(a)jabber.org, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B
http://dimitris.glezos.com/

"He who gives up functionality for ease of use
loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous)
--

[Asgeir Frimannsson]

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Paul W. Frields <stickster(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote:

>  Hi L10n'ers...
>
>  I had some questions about our Fedora Transifex instance, which may be
>  shown somewhere but I hadn't time to find all the answers.
>
>  * Which Tx version is running on translate.fedoraproject.org?
>
>  * What's the latest stable code available?
>
>  * If those are different, what is the current plan for updating the Tx
>   instance in translate.fp.o?  Is that plan on the wiki?
>  
Just adding to this list:

* Are we planning to replace Damned Lies with Transifex for statistics for
F11 translations?

I'm asking since I know the Django-beta of Transifex has statistics. At the
same time, Damned Lies upstream has moved to Django and is in production at
l10n.gnome.org. If we were to integrate the new Damned Lies we need FAS
authentication there as well, and in addition, there would potentially be a
bit of work with moving the XML configuration over to the database.

cheers,
asgeir