iBus translations submission!

[Ankit Patel]

Hi all,

Because of some technical issue, discussed here: 
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1294, submission 
of iBus (the new input method for Fedora 11) translation can't be done 
through Transifex.

Since the freeze date for translations is approaching, you can send your 
translations for iBus, to shawn.p.huang at gmail com , as mentioned 
here: https://translate.fedoraproject.org/tx/projects/ibus/master/ 
(Thanks Sandeep for informing me about this).

I am not sure about, whether status updated status will be reflected or 
not, after shawn submits your translation file to the github repository!

Thanks!

-- 
Regards,
Ankit Patel
http://www.indianoss.org/

[Xavi Conde]

Hi Ankitkumar,

2009/4/1 Ankitkumar Rameshchandra Patel <ankit(a)redhat.com&gt;:
>  Hi all,
>
>  Because of some technical issue, discussed here:
>  https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1294, submission of
>  iBus (the new input method for Fedora 11) translation can't be done through
>  Transifex.
>
>  Since the freeze date for translations is approaching, you can send your
>  translations for iBus, to shawn.p.huang at gmail com , as mentioned here:
>  https://translate.fedoraproject.org/tx/projects/ibus/master/ (Thanks Sandeep
>  for informing me about this).
>
>  I am not sure about, whether status updated status will be reflected or not,
>  after shawn submits your translation file to the github repository!
>
>  Thanks!
>  
thanks for the info, we'll have time to submit a translation. However,
I would like to know why a core module like this is not in fedora-11
but in various. In order to priorize translations, I would like to
know which translations are "core" and which isn't. Why packagekit,
rpm, yum, iBus and pulseaudio - among others - are not under the
fedora-11 category? I think that this category should group all
packages that are installed by default and are part of the system.

Thanks!

-- 
“A defect is an instance in which a requirement is not satisfied.” [Fagan, 1986]

Un bloc de cinépatas: http://banda-aparte.blog-city.com/
Facebookeja'm: http://ca-es.facebook.com/people/Xavier-Conde-Rueda/1620695057

[Piotr Drąg]

Xavier Conde Rueda pisze:
>  thanks for the info, we'll have time to submit a translation.
> However,
>  I would like to know why a core module like this is not in fedora-11
>  but in various. In order to priorize translations, I would like to
>  know which translations are "core" and which isn't. Why packagekit,
>  rpm, yum, iBus and pulseaudio - among others - are not under the
>  fedora-11 category? I think that this category should group all
>  packages that are installed by default and are part of the system.
>   
All of these are external modules, independent from Fedora. In 
fedora-11-like categories we have only projects that we are upstream of.

-- 
Piotr Drąg
http://raven.pmail.pl

[Dimitris Glezos]

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Piotr Drąg <piotrdrag(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  All of these are external modules, independent from Fedora. In
>  fedora-11-like categories we have only projects that we are upstream of. 
It's worth noting that with Transifex 0.5, creating and maintaining
Collections and Releases is easier, so we could have more releases and
components included in >1 of them.

-δ

-- 
Dimitris Glezos
Jabber ID: glezos(a)jabber.org, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B
http://dimitris.glezos.com/

"He who gives up functionality for ease of use
loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous)
--

[Kris Thomsen]

Hi,
I have translated this file into danish - BUT, what about all the lines,
which starts with "keyboard label" - how should they be handled?

// Kris
Danish maintainer

2009/4/1 Dimitris Glezos <dimitris(a)glezos.com&gt;

>  On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Piotr Drąg
> <piotrdrag(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  > All of these are external modules, independent from Fedora. In
>  > fedora-11-like categories we have only projects that we are upstream of.
>
>  It's worth noting that with Transifex 0.5, creating and maintaining
>  Collections and Releases is easier, so we could have more releases and
>  components included in >1 of them.
>
>  -δ
>
>  --
>  Dimitris Glezos
>  Jabber ID: glezos(a)jabber.org, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B
>  http://dimitris.glezos.com/
>
>  "He who gives up functionality for ease of use
>  loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous)
>  --
>
>  --
>  Fedora-trans-list mailing list
>  Fedora-trans-list(a)redhat.com
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-trans-list
>

[Miloš Komarčević]

2009/4/1 Kris Thomsen <lakristho(a)gmail.com&gt;:
>  Hi,
>  I have translated this file into danish - BUT, what about all the lines,
>  which starts with "keyboard label" - how should they be handled? 
Those didn't make much sense to me either, so I just left them untranslated.

Regards,
Miloš

[Kris Thomsen]

Thanks Miloš :)
I think I will do the same.

2009/4/2 Miloš Komarčević <kmilos(a)gmail.com&gt;

>  2009/4/1 Kris Thomsen <lakristho(a)gmail.com&gt;:
>  > Hi,
>  > I have translated this file into danish - BUT, what about all the lines,
>  > which starts with "keyboard label" - how should they be handled?
>
>  Those didn't make much sense to me either, so I just left them
>  untranslated.
>
>  Regards,
>  Miloš
>
>  --
>  Fedora-trans-list mailing list
>  Fedora-trans-list(a)redhat.com
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-trans-list
>

[Xavi Conde]

Hi,

2009/4/2 Kris Thomsen <lakristho(a)gmail.com&gt;:
>  Hi,
>  I have translated this file into danish - BUT, what about all the lines,
>  which starts with "keyboard label" - how should they be handled?
>
>  // Kris
>  Danish maintainer
>  
these strings are handled internally by gettext to provide a
"context", they're not to be translated. Your translation must omit
them. See http://leonardof.org/2007/12/01/context-in-gnome-translations/en/.

Regards!

-- 
“A defect is an instance in which a requirement is not satisfied.” [Fagan, 1986]

Un bloc de cinépatas: http://banda-aparte.blog-city.com/
Facebookeja'm: http://ca-es.facebook.com/people/Xavier-Conde-Rueda/1620695057

Translations for Virtualization Modules!

[Ankit Patel]

Xavier Conde Rueda wrote:
>  Hi,
>
>  thannks for the info. Older DL used to have the bugzilla info in the
>  project page, do you know if Tx will support this vital info?
>     
We have an open space to write stuff there:

e.g. for Virt-manager module you can see here: 
https://translate.fedoraproject.org/tx/projects/virt-manager/tip/

"Translation Submission: Please submit translations through Bugzilla"

Is that what you are asking for?

-- 
Regards,
Ankit Patel
http://www.indianoss.org/

Translations for Virtualization Modules!

[Xavi Conde]

Hi,

>  We have an open space to write stuff there:
>
>  e.g. for Virt-manager module you can see here:
>  https://translate.fedoraproject.org/tx/projects/virt-manager/tip/
>
>  "Translation Submission: Please submit translations through Bugzilla"
>
>  Is that what you are asking for?
>  
It's ok, thanks!

-- 
“A defect is an instance in which a requirement is not satisfied.” [Fagan, 1986]

Un bloc de cinépatas: http://banda-aparte.blog-city.com/
Facebookeja'm: http://ca-es.facebook.com/people/Xavier-Conde-Rueda/1620695057

[Noriko Mizumoto]

Piotr Drąg さんは書きました:
>  Xavier Conde Rueda pisze:
> > thanks for the info, we'll have time to submit a translation. However,
> > I would like to know why a core module like this is not in fedora-11
> > but in various. In order to priorize translations, I would like to
> > know which translations are "core" and which isn't. Why packagekit,
> > rpm, yum, iBus and pulseaudio - among others - are not under the
> > fedora-11 category? I think that this category should group all
> > packages that are installed by default and are part of the system.
> >
>  
>  All of these are external modules, independent from Fedora. In 
>  fedora-11-like categories we have only projects that we are upstream of. 
Is anyway to identify/categorize/group/whatever those packages among 
others installed by default for easy prioritization?

noriko

[Piotr Drąg]

Noriko Mizumoto pisze:
>  Is anyway to identify/categorize/group/whatever those packages among
>
>  others installed by default for easy prioritization?
>   
Currently I'm working on creating new categories and re-organizing some 
of them. For now this list can be helpful for new translators:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/GUI

-- 
Piotr Drąg
http://raven.pmail.pl

[Ankit Patel]

Piotr Drąg wrote:
>  Noriko Mizumoto pisze:
> > Is anyway to identify/categorize/group/whatever those packages among 
> > others installed by default for easy prioritization?
> >
>
>  Currently I'm working on creating new categories and re-organizing 
>  some of them. For now this list can be helpful for new translators:
>
>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/GUI
>  
Piotr,

Looks good list for the start. Let's know if you need any help for 
preparing this list. Fedora I18n team could be the best to help us on 
preparing this list, I think.

As Noriko mentioned, having another category of "Packages installed by 
default" for the minimal install would be really good too.

Btw, Can we have some definition or explanation for these categories on 
the wiki page? That makes it clear for translators to understand the 
category.

Thanks!

-- 
Regards,
Ankit Patel
http://www.indianoss.org/