system-config-packages and status page

[Sarah Wang]

Hi all,

The status page has been modified to reflect the correct branch for
system-config-packages: redhat-config-packages-1_1_x

Please make sure you do "cvs up -rredhat-config-packages-1_1_x" in your
translate/system-config-packages/ directory to work on the right files.

All locale maintainers, please ensure your respective community is aware
of this change.

Thanks,
Sarah

[Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan]

Sarah Wang wrote:
>  Hi all,
>  
>  The status page has been modified to reflect the correct branch for
>  system-config-packages: redhat-config-packages-1_1_x
>  
>  Please make sure you do "cvs up -rredhat-config-packages-1_1_x" in your
>  translate/system-config-packages/ directory to work on the right files.
>  
>  All locale maintainers, please ensure your respective community is aware
>  of this change.
>  
>  Thanks,
>  Sarah
>  
>  
>  --
>  Fedora-trans-list mailing list
>  Fedora-trans-list(a)redhat.com
>  http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-trans-list
>   
With this "recent" changes, what is the correct way for a new translator 
to checkout the translation?

Checkout HEAD and then downgrade system-config-package to 1_1_x ?

The question will keep popping up if it is not documented somewhere.

-----
Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan

[Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan]

Sarah Wang wrote:
>  Hi all,
>  
>  The status page has been modified to reflect the correct branch for
>  system-config-packages: redhat-config-packages-1_1_x
>  
>  Please make sure you do "cvs up -rredhat-config-packages-1_1_x" in your
>  translate/system-config-packages/ directory to work on the right files.
>  
>  All locale maintainers, please ensure your respective community is aware
>  of this change.
>  
>  Thanks,
>  Sarah
>  
>  
>  --
>  Fedora-trans-list mailing list
>  Fedora-trans-list(a)redhat.com
>  http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-trans-list
>   
Sarah,

Can you put redhat-config-packages-1_1_x as another packages on the 
status page, so that people will know that there exist two different 
branch, and also to enable us to keep translating redhat-config-packages 
   HEAD. In the end, 1_1_x branch will go away someday.


-- 
-----
Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan

[Sarah Wang]

On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 11:41, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote:
>  With this "recent" changes, what is the correct way for a
> new translator 
>  to checkout the translation?
>  
>  Checkout HEAD and then downgrade system-config-package to 1_1_x ? 
For the moment yes. Alternatively I can add a new module definition
"translate-fc3" or something like that, which will check out all correct
branches for fc3. How does that sound?
>  
>  The question will keep popping up if it is not documented somewhere. 
Agree totally. I'll try to put that info on the website somewhere.
>  
>  -----
>  Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan
>  
>  
>  --
>  Fedora-trans-list mailing list
>  Fedora-trans-list(a)redhat.com
>  http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-trans-list

[Sarah Wang]

On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 12:02, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote:

>  Sarah,
>  
>  Can you put redhat-config-packages-1_1_x as another packages on the 
>  status page, so that people will know that there exist two different 
>  branch, and also to enable us to keep translating redhat-config-packages 
>     HEAD. In the end, 1_1_x branch will go away someday. 
Good point. If majority agrees to have status for all relevant branches,
then we can put them all on the status page.

Sarah
>

[Alan Cox]

On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 04:05:03PM +1000, Sarah Wang wrote:
>  
>  Good point. If majority agrees to have status for all relevant branches,
>  then we can put them all on the status page. 
Sounds good to me

[Bernd Groh]

Hi All,

I've updated the status pages accordingly. Let's just hope there's not 
too much branching with different tag names going on. :)

Cheers,
Bernd


Alan Cox wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 04:05:03PM +1000, Sarah Wang wrote:
>   
>
> >Good point. If majority agrees to have status for all relevant branches,
> >then we can put them all on the status page.
> >    
> >
>
> Sounds good to me
>
>
> --
> Fedora-trans-list mailing list
> Fedora-trans-list(a)redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-trans-list
>   
>

[Josep Puigdemont]

Are there other branches for FC3?

For next releases of FC, maybe it would be good to send a mail to this
list, right after the string freeze, indicating which branch will be
used for each module (or list maybe those that are not HEAD).

Regards,

/Josep

On dj, 2004-09-16 at 03:05, Bernd Groh wrote:
>  Hi All,
>  
>  I've updated the status pages accordingly. Let's just hope there's not 
>  too much branching with different tag names going on. :)
>  
>  Cheers,
>  Bernd
>  
>  
>  Alan Cox wrote:
>  
>  >On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 04:05:03PM +1000, Sarah Wang wrote:
>  >  
>  >
>  >>Good point. If majority agrees to have status for all relevant branches,
>  >>then we can put them all on the status page.
>  >>    
>  >>
>  >
>  >Sounds good to me
>  >
>  >

[Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan]

Nicely done!

Clean and clear. Thank you. :)

Bernd Groh wrote:
>  Hi All,
>  
>  I've updated the status pages accordingly. Let's just hope there's not 
>  too much branching with different tag names going on. :)
>  
>  Cheers,
>  Bernd
>  
>   
-- 
-----
Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan