Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225741
Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |NOTABUG
--- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2008-12-19 02:27:47 EDT ---
This package is dead now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225737
Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Merge Review: |Merge Review:
|evolution-connector (not |evolution-exchange
|started) |
--- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2008-12-19 02:26:50 EDT ---
evolution-connector was renamed to evolution-exchange, but I can find no review
ticket for evolution-exchange so I suppose it still needs one. I'll repurpose
this ticket.
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/evolution-exchange/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073
Jarod Wilson <jwilson(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |maxx(a)krakoa.dk
--- Comment #18 from Jarod Wilson <jwilson(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-18 16:20:43 EDT ---
*** Bug 445100 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186527
Andrew Rechenberg <arechenberg(a)shermfin.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |arechenberg(a)shermfin.com
--- Comment #55 from Andrew Rechenberg <arechenberg(a)shermfin.com> 2008-12-18 08:58:00 EDT ---
Still seeing an issue with F10. As I stated in #182464, if I chkconfig network
on this change resolves the issue for me since the network is started and the
messagebus service can talk to my AD LDAP server.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182464
Andrew Rechenberg <arechenberg(a)shermfin.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |arechenberg(a)shermfin.com
--- Comment #31 from Andrew Rechenberg <arechenberg(a)shermfin.com> 2008-12-18 08:53:05 EDT ---
This also occurs on F10 with all updates as of yesterday (20081217).
I have the following in /etc/ldap.conf:
nss_initgroups_ignoreusers root,ldap,named,avahi,haldaemon,dbus
I am using nss_ldap to retrieve user information from an Active Directory
domain with an ldaps:// URI and ssl set to yes in /etc/ldap.conf
This problem (at least for me) is network-related as the network hasn't come up
yet because it is controller in F10 with NetworkManager and NetworkManager
depends on messagebus being started.
I chkconfig'd network on since it was off and it's start priority is 10 and it
will start before messagebus and this change resolves the hanging of messagebus
at boot-time for me.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365691
--- Comment #18 from David Tonhofer <d.tonhofer(a)m-plify.com> 2008-12-18 07:43:07 EDT ---
Re about the high-probability lock-up during Fedora 10 installation with a
Radeon XPRESS 200M (a derivate of Mobility Radeon X300, not a Radeon 9200,
sorry), I am happy to report that after successful installation and a "yum
update" the machine runs somewhat stabler; lock-up is every 3 hours or so ;-)
Currently at: xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.9.0-61.fc10.i386
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246481
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2008-12-17 19:33:14 EDT ---
mercurial-1.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229179
Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
External Bug ID| |SpamAssassin 5873
--- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> 2008-12-17 11:12:58 EDT ---
ok. Sounds fine to me. If you do notice anything related to this please do
update the bug so we see it.
I will also add the upstream bug linked to this.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355761
--- Comment #9 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus(a)free.fr> 2008-12-17 10:46:57 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> LessTif is faulty and incomplete, and because it is dead, too, I only see one
> remedy for LessTif users which is to remove Lesstif from Fedora and to move all
> depending packages to "RPM Fusion" which has the possibility to provide Open
> Motif packages. Only a handful of packages are concerned anyway [ddd, dx,
> grace, nedit, xbae].
It is already possible to have an openmotif-devel package in rpmfusion, though
it would conflicts with the lesstif-devel package in fedora. In mock, it is
possible to rebuild the dependent packages in rpmfusion against openmotif, call
them differently and let the user chose one. lesstif and openmotif themselves
should not conflict.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355761
--- Comment #8 from Joachim Frieben <jfrieben(a)hotmail.com> 2008-12-17 10:29:49 EDT ---
LessTif is faulty and incomplete, and because it is dead, too, I only see one
remedy for LessTif users which is to remove Lesstif from Fedora and to move all
depending packages to "RPM Fusion" which has the possibility to provide Open
Motif packages. Only a handful of packages are concerned anyway [ddd, dx,
grace, nedit, xbae].
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.