triage July 2008

triage@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
308 discussions

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jul '08

27 Jul '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |9 redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact| |extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Version|9 |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com 2008-05-13 22:30 EST ------- Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de 2008-07-27 10:49 EST ------- This still applies on Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 443730] Mimedefang doesn't check for viruses upon installation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jul '08

27 Jul '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Mimedefang doesn't check for viruses upon installation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443730 redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kernel(a)pkts.ca) ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de 2008-07-27 10:46 EST ------- Penelope, can you please have a look to comment #2 whether it solves your issue or not? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 274261] drivers/rtc/hctosys.c: unable to open rtc device (rtc0)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jul '08

27 Jul '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: drivers/rtc/hctosys.c: unable to open rtc device (rtc0) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=274261 redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup |bzcl34nup ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de 2008-07-27 10:38 EST ------- Doesn't seem to show up with rawhide any longer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 291291] yumex dies after partial update
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jul '08

27 Jul '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: yumex dies after partial update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291291 hcmeyer(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |fc9 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From hcmeyer(a)gmail.com 2008-07-27 08:15 EST ------- Sorry about delay, this bug no longer exists. Kill it, please. However I have a new one to file against fc10-rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 355861] interpreter_regex should include libexecdir
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jul '08

27 Jul '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: interpreter_regex should include libexecdir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355861 fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |9 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com 2008-05-13 23:46 EST ------- Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping ------- Additional Comments From updates(a)fedoraproject.org 2008-07-27 03:51 EST ------- rpmlint-0.84-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 230856] autogen package is misconfigured
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jul '08

27 Jul '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: autogen package is misconfigured https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230856 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com 2008-07-27 02:47 EST ------- autogen has a runtime dependency on autogen-libopts, while autogen-libopts-devel has a similar dependency on autogen-libopts. These are the files in the autogen: %doc AUTHORS %doc ChangeLog %doc COPYING %doc NEWS %doc README %doc THANKS %doc TODO %doc pkg/libopts/COPYING.gplv3 %{_bindir}/columns %{_bindir}/getdefs %{_bindir}/%{name} %{_bindir}/xml2ag %{_infodir}/%{name}.info.gz %{_infodir}/%{name}.info-1.gz %{_infodir}/%{name}.info-2.gz %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1.gz %{_mandir}/man1/columns.1.gz %{_mandir}/man1/getdefs.1.gz %{_mandir}/man1/xml2ag.1.gz %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/%{name}/stdoptions.def %{_datadir}/%{name}/*.tpl These are the files in autogen-libopts: %doc pkg/libopts/COPYING.mbsd %doc pkg/libopts/COPYING.lgplv3 %{_libdir}/libguileopts.so.* %{_libdir}/libopts.so.* These are the files in the autogen-libopts-devel: %{_bindir}/autoopts-config %{_datadir}/aclocal/autoopts.m4 %{_datadir}/aclocal/liboptschk.m4 %{_libdir}/libguileopts.so %{_libdir}/libopts.so %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/autoopts.pc %{_mandir}/man1/autoopts-config.1.gz %{_mandir}/man3/* %dir %{_includedir}/autoopts %{_includedir}/autoopts/options.h %{_includedir}/autoopts/usage-txt.h Moreover autogen is tagged as GPLv3+. (Some files are licensed under GPLv2+. Some files are licensed under GPLv2+.) autogen-libopts and autogen-libopts-devel are tagged as LGPLv3+. (Although sources are dual licensed with BSD, some autogen generated files are only under LGPLv3+. We drop BSD to avoid multiple licensing scenario.) So I guess the clients do not have to bother about the GPL virus, since the libraries are separated out in LGPL-ed packages. Package sources: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/autogen/devel/ Comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 230856] autogen package is misconfigured
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jul '08

26 Jul '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: autogen package is misconfigured https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230856 ------- Additional Comments From bkorb(a)gnu.org 2008-07-26 20:52 EST ------- No, actually Bruce was talking about the separation of "autogen" and "autogen-devel". Without doing a careful analysis of which pieces went where, the autogen collection of binaries requires the libopts shared library ("autogen-libopts"). Applications that use generated options (via the "autogen-libopts-devel" template files and "autogen" executable), will also need "autogen-libopts" to be installed. When such apps are installed, they would _not_ need either "autogen" or "autogen-libopts-devel". Just and only the shared library. The full build of such a product would require all three. So, assuming that "autogen-libopts-devel" includes the option templates (e.g. option.tpl), this file is useless without autogen. Thus, "autogen-libopts-devel" really requires both "autogen" and "autogen-libopts". What I chose to do for myself and my own releases was to say, "disk space is cheap and it is not worth the bother to try to separate "libopts/autoopts" from "autogen". I also do not see a problem with providing alternate licenses to specific source files, all bundled into one package. I am not a lawyer, but 40 years of prior art seems to indicate that it is important to mark each and every source file with a copyright notice line or two. That implies that each file stands on its own. I do not want my autoopts using "clients" to fret over the perceived "GPL virus". I hope I'm being clear. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 226046] Merge Review: libsoup
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jul '08

26 Jul '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libsoup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226046 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com 2008-07-26 03:46 EST ------- Could you please close this review after resolving the "unused-direct-shlib-dependency" issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 337051] fpc misuses DW_AT_comp_dir and .debug_line directory and file name formats
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jul '08

26 Jul '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fpc misuses DW_AT_comp_dir and .debug_line directory and file name formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337051 ------- Additional Comments From updates(a)fedoraproject.org 2008-07-26 02:02 EST ------- fpc-2.2.0-12.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 249109] KDE sets XDG_CONFIG_DIRS to desktop environment specific directory
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jul '08

26 Jul '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: KDE sets XDG_CONFIG_DIRS to desktop environment specific directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249109 ------- Additional Comments From updates(a)fedoraproject.org 2008-07-26 01:57 EST ------- kde-settings-4.0-23.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
31
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage July 2008