[Bug 308121] error dialog when mounting encrypted USB stick
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308121
Ulrich Drepper <drepper(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
--- Comment #3 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper(a)redhat.com> 2008-08-24 23:57:57 EDT ---
I haven't seen this problem in a long time, maybe never with F9, I cannot say
for sure. I close the bug, anybody hitting it can use F9.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 8 months
[Bug 328941] nm-applet crashes trying to connect to my WPA network
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328941
David Nalley <david(a)gnsa.us> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC| |david(a)gnsa.us
Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA
--- Comment #4 from David Nalley <david(a)gnsa.us> 2008-08-23 23:06:07 EDT ---
Since there are insufficient details provided in this report for us to
investigate the issue further, and we have not received feedback to the
information we have requested above, we will assume the problem was not
reproducible, or has been fixed in one of the updates we have released for the
reporter's distribution.
Users who have experienced this problem are encouraged to upgrade to the latest
update of their distribution, and if this issue turns out to still be
reproducible in the latest update, please reopen this bug with additional
information.
Closing as INSUFFICIENT_DATA.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 8 months
[Bug 446294] incorrect exit from 'ls'
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446294
--- Comment #12 from Greg Metcalfe <metcalfegreg(a)qwest.net> 2008-08-21 15:19:15 EDT ---
Reply to Comment #10, "I would not call it a bug, it is just a bit confusing
documentation."
That's a philosophical distinction. To me, an important measure of software
quality lies in whether it runs as it's documented to run. A flaw in docs,
whether external to the sources, such as man pages, or internal, such as
comments, can cause a lot of man-hour wastage. You can't quantify that, as you
can have no idea of some random end-user's circumstances.
I regard any flaw in a shipping package as a bug, as it's a potentially serious
disservice to that random end-user. If you want to have that discussion, we'd
best take it off-line. We seem to have very different ideas about quality.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 8 months
[Bug 446294] incorrect exit from 'ls'
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446294
--- Comment #11 from Greg Metcalfe <metcalfegreg(a)qwest.net> 2008-08-21 14:40:34 EDT ---
Current man page says:
Exit status is 0 if OK, 1 if minor problems, 2 if serious trouble.
Current info page says:
0 success
1 minor problems (e.g., a subdirectory was not found)
2 serious trouble (e.g., memory exhausted)
How about:
Exit status is 0 if OK. 1 if minor problems, e.g. failure to stat a non-command
line file or directory. 2 if serious trouble, e.g. failure to stat a command
line argument, an out of memory failure, etc.
Both info and man pages would have to changed.
I still think that the comments in the source are misleading, as per my comment
#3. Not fixing comments is an invitation to regression, *clearly* makes
reporting bugs more difficult, etc. But I have to pick my battles, and I'm
hoping to get another submission in on man(5) yum.conf. Rather more extensive,
though nothing like http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0388.html.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 8 months
[Bug 259981] Audio not working in fedora 7
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=259981
David Nalley <david(a)gnsa.us> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC| |david(a)gnsa.us
Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA
--- Comment #5 from David Nalley <david(a)gnsa.us> 2008-08-21 13:54:10 EDT ---
The information we've requested above is required in order
to review this problem report further and diagnose or fix the
issue if it is still present. Since it has been thirty days or
more since we first requested additional information, we're assuming
the problem is either no longer present in the current Fedora release, or
that there is no longer any interest in tracking the problem.
Setting status to "CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA". If you still
experience this problem after updating to our latest Fedora
release and can provide the information previously requested,
please feel free to reopen the bug report.
Thank you in advance.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 8 months