Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |haanjdj(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #17 from Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-05 05:11:17 EDT ---
*** Bug 430280 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073
Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |opensource(a)till.name
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kwizart(a)gmail.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
Summary|nash mount should support |[PATCH] nash mount should
|relatime |support relatime
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
Jayson King <bugzilla2(a)jaysonking.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #328155|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #16 from Jayson King <bugzilla2(a)jaysonking.org> 2009-01-04 18:36:55 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=328162)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328162)
adapt earlier patch for F10 mkinitrd
As long as we're including linux/fs.h we can get rid of the other MS_* defines
also.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453036
Summary: Build php-pecl-apc for EPEL 4
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el4
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: php-pecl-apc
AssignedTo: rpm(a)timj.co.uk
ReportedBy: rpm(a)timj.co.uk
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: chabotc@xs4all.nl,fedora-triage-list@redhat.com
Build php-pecl-apc for EPEL 4
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
--- Comment #15 from Jayson King <bugzilla2(a)jaysonking.org> 2009-01-04 17:06:40 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=328155)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328155)
adapt earlier patch for F10 mkinitrd
I don't know if there is a compelling reason to define the MS_* constants
explicitly, but here's a patch for F10 mkinitrd that is an adaptation of the
earlier patch with the change that it replaces #define MS_* with #include
<linux/fs.h>.
Tested on x86_64.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
Jayson King <bugzilla2(a)jaysonking.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bugzilla2(a)jaysonking.org
--- Comment #14 from Jayson King <bugzilla2(a)jaysonking.org> 2009-01-04 16:50:34 EDT ---
I recently ran into this as well. IMO nash should be able to handle relatime
just as it handles the other flags (it does noatime, nodiratime, etc already).
I adapted the patch here for F10, and it Just Works. Here are some thoughts
that I have about this, though:
1) nash.c should include linux/fs.h, instead of defining its own MS_*
constants.
2) mkinitrd should know about the flags that nash understands, and reject any
that won't work, or at least warn the user.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073
Dan HorĂ¡k <dan(a)danny.cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dan(a)danny.cz
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186512
--- Comment #42 from David Tonhofer <d.tonhofer(a)m-plify.com> 2009-01-04 10:18:40 EDT ---
Thanks Andre,
After retesting, any consistent explanation fell apart, and I am now pretty
sure that it is just my DVD-ROM drive which does not work or which has some
problem with the motherboard. Time burnt on a stupid problem, damn you
non-self-checking hardware! Okay, out goes the drive...
I'm not sure whether "ide=nodma" still has any effect whatsoever in F10,
especially with SATA drives? The last time it was mentioned was in the Fedora
Core 4 release notes at http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/fc4/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.