January 2009 - triage - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 197455] dmesg says CPU has Pentium F0 0F bug..../proc/cpuinfo says it hasnt
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '26

10 Feb '26

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197455 --- Comment #20 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> 2008-09-13 00:24:33 EDT --- Yeah, after all the years, this bug finally seems to be fixed: # uname -a Linux manus 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i586 #1 SMP Wed Sep 3 03:05:01 EDT 2008 i586 i586 i386 GNU/Linux # dmesg | grep -i'f0 0f' Intel Pentium with F0 0F bug - workaround enabled. # cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -i 'f00f' f00f_bug : yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 5

[Bug 440580] New: no gpm mouse support in mc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Dec '09

15 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440580 Summary: no gpm mouse support in mc Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mc AssignedTo: jnovy(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: stsp(a)aknet.ru QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com,leonard-rh- bugzilla@den.ottolander.nl,stsp@aknet.ru +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #194593 +++ Description of problem: Mouse doesn't work in mc. "ldd /usr/bin/mc" doesn't list libgpm, so the mouse obviously is not expeced to work. This is quite bad, unless I am missing something obvious. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mc-4.6.1a-13.FC5 How reproducible: Press the left mouse button and move the mouse. Only the gpm text selection happens. You can't go to menu or move the mc cursor with the mouse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 8

[Bug 456393] New: RFE: version of pgf in texlive is old
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Oct '09

21 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456393 Summary: RFE: version of pgf in texlive is old Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgf/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: texlive-texmf AssignedTo: jnovy(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: uckelman(a)nomic.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de,fedora-triage- list@redhat.com,pertusus@free.fr +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #219146 +++ Description of problem: Version 1.10 of pgf is packaged with texlive; the current version of pgf (2.0) is two years newer and has far more features. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): texlive-texmf-2007-22.fc9.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 7

[Bug 481147] New: cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 May '09

12 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481147 Summary: cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: cpan2rpm AssignedTo: gavin.henry(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: gavin.brown(a)uk.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com, gavin.henry(a)gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 279251 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #279251 +++ Description of problem: The latest version of Pod::Text from CPAN is from RRA/podlators-2.2.2.tar.gz Pod::Text no longer derives from Pod::Parser so the method 'interpolate' does not exist. As near as I can tell, this is the only method used in cpan2rpm, so Pod::Text can be changed to Pod::Parser in the two places it appears. This is what I did locally and it now works for me. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cpan2rpm-2.028-2.fc8.1.noarch How reproducible: update Pod::Text via cpan. Run cpan2rpm for some module (any will do...) Actual results: [...] -- module: /var/cache/cpan/build/libwww-perl-5.808-baHtIL -- Metadata retrieval Can't locate object method "interpolate" via package "Pod::Text" at /usr/bin/cpan2rpm line 522. -- Done -- Expected results: No failure from above. Additional info: --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2008-05-14 10:14:55 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 7 is nearing the end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 7. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '7'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 7's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 7 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. If possible, it is recommended that you try the newest available Fedora distribution to see if your bug still exists. Please read the Release Notes for the newest Fedora distribution to make sure it will meet your needs: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/ The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2008-06-16 22:19:58 EDT --- Fedora 7 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on June 13, 2008. Fedora 7 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 16

[Bug 185862] %_sharedstatedir violates the FHS
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Jan '09

31 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=185862 Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #19 from Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-31 07:01:27 EDT --- Fixed in rpm-4.6.0-0.rc4.2.fc11, %_sharedstatedir gets set to /var/lib in the linux-platform macros now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Jan '09

31 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #27 from Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-31 04:56:36 EDT --- I don't see what's do difficult about this. Just don't use the old grub conf, have a separate template file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 232522] mgetty does not collect caller name from modem properly
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Jan '09

31 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232522 --- Comment #22 from Jiri Skala <jskala(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-31 03:21:03 EDT --- Please, use rpm file directly. Jiri -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 232522] mgetty does not collect caller name from modem properly
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jan '09

30 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232522 --- Comment #21 from Don Russell <fedora(a)drussell.dnsalias.com> 2009-01-30 18:24:29 EDT --- It will take me a few days (perhaps a week) to get to this. So I expect to be able to give you a definitive answer NLT Mon 9 Feb. Will this (your rebased version with my patches) be available on F9 via yum, or do I need to d/l the rpm file directly? Thanks, I appreciate your work taking my changes forward. Don Russell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jan '09

30 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 Eric Paris <eparis(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eparis(a)redhat.com Version|9 |rawhide --- Comment #26 from Eric Paris <eparis(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-30 10:22:48 EDT --- Moving to rawhide as I just got this error on an F11 pre alpha install and then tried to use yum to update my kernel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 232522] mgetty does not collect caller name from modem properly
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jan '09

30 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232522 Jiri Skala <jskala(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jskala(a)redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #20 from Jiri Skala <jskala(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-30 08:50:20 EDT --- Hi, I re-based F-9 to 1.1.36 and applied your patches. The build is http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=80916 Please, let me know if the build mgetty-1.1.36-1.fc9 is ok. Then I'll apply it to F10 and rawhide and I'll send it to upstream. Cheers, Jiri -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 196151] Kscreensaver fails to unlock
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jan '09

30 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196151 --- Comment #18 from Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-30 07:23:33 EDT --- Oddly, this remains an issue on my work desktop machine -- which was originally installed with Fedora $whatever-was-current in January 2006 and upgraded ever since -- but is not an issue on my laptop or netbook, both of which have fresh Fedora 10 installs. What's the difference? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 190209] Raise file conflicts always, not just on additional transactions
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jan '09

30 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190209 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #19 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 20:49:19 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #20 from Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-30 04:02:28 EDT --- Hmm actually this is fixed in F10 (since last July): the conflict behavior is consistent, which is what the original request was - colored files are allowed to overlap whether in same transaction or not, and for everything else conflicts are always raised. Eliminating the "sharing" of colored files is another issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 250299] Grub sometimes does not detect entire memory map
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jan '09

30 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250299 Petri T. Koistinen <petri.koistinen(a)iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petri.koistinen(a)iki.fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 227283] pnmtofiasco can't read valid PNM files created by netpbm
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '09

29 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227283 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:11:35 EDT --- netpbm-10.35.58-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 227283] pnmtofiasco can't read valid PNM files created by netpbm
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '09

29 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227283 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 227283] pnmtofiasco can't read valid PNM files created by netpbm
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '09

29 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227283 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:08:47 EDT --- netpbm-10.35.58-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 324721] Left-handed mouse orientation also changes touchpad touch click
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '09

29 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=324721 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 324721] Left-handed mouse orientation also changes touchpad touch click
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '09

29 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=324721 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:04:03 EDT --- gnome-settings-daemon-2.24.1-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 266061] Volume manager window is not the right size
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '09

29 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266061 --- Comment #8 from Christopher Beland <beland(a)alum.mit.edu> 2009-01-29 02:37:13 EDT --- Confirmed; in gnome-media-2.25.5-1.fc11.x86_64, for example, the interface has gotten a radical overhaul and the slider layout is now simpler. Thanks for the update! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 213042] gnome-terminal cursor defaults to blinking
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jan '09

28 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213042 --- Comment #9 from Tim "Taiwanese" Liim <timliim(a)alcatel-lucent.com> 2009-01-28 17:29:36 EDT --- Does the proposal in Comment #8 make sense to you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 229141] initscript does not allow customizations
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jan '09

28 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229141 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-28 14:11:36 EDT --- I will try to fix this in this next weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 202823] cp -a doesn't copy user/root xattrs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jan '09

28 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202823 Kamil Dudka <kdudka(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |ovasik(a)redhat.com Fixed In Version| |coreutils-7.0-7.fc11 Resolution| |RAWHIDE AssignedTo|ovasik(a)redhat.com |kdudka(a)redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Kamil Dudka <kdudka(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-28 13:27:08 EDT --- Fixed in rawhide. Note that cp -a still doesn't copy user/root xattrs. The appropriate cp option is --preserve=xattr. mv always preserves xattrs, install never preserves xattrs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 263241] NTLM library needed
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jan '09

28 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263241 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> 2009-01-28 11:02:11 EDT --- Indeed, unfortunately, libntlm doesn't export the MD4 functions. Maybe we could get the author to change that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 263241] NTLM library needed
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jan '09

28 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263241 Robert Townley <rob.townley(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rob.townley(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 251062] auto-mounted for root file systems are left unmounted after log-out
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jan '09

28 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251062 Tony Fu <tfu(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|alan(a)redhat.com |peterm(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jan '09

27 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Michel Alexandre Salim <michel.sylvan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 249197] It's not possible to set speed with wodim
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jan '09

26 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249197 --- Comment #8 from Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> 2009-01-26 18:22:37 EDT --- You are of course not allowed to do that, but why do you like to put parts of the official free software into your fork that cannot be legally distributed because your fork is in conflict with GPL and Copyright? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 243172] APIC-Error "timer not connected to IO-APIC
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jan '09

26 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243172 Brian Maly <bmaly(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #7 from Brian Maly <bmaly(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-26 13:46:07 EDT --- The most common cause of this problem is a misconfigured APIC and most often the APIC is misconfigured before boot (by the BIOS). Can we verify the BIOS is not the culprit? Please verify the BIOS with Linux Firmware Kit. Download the latest ISO and boot off CD. Download from -> http://linuxfirmwarekit.org/download.php Also, can you attach a /var/log/dmesg from the affected hardware? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 186527] Startup hangs at "starting system message bus" if ldaps authentication enabled in firstboot
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jan '09

26 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186527 Dennis Wagelaar <dennis.wagelaar(a)vub.ac.be> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis.wagelaar(a)vub.ac.be -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 249197] It's not possible to set speed with wodim
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jan '09

26 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249197 --- Comment #7 from Harald Hoyer <harald(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-26 04:54:51 EDT --- Am I allowd to extract the patch from the CDDL version and apply it to the GPL version? I don't think so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 254126] ghdl does not build on ppc64 due to missing gcc-gnat
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jan '09

26 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254126 Bug 254126 depends on bug 241098, which changed state. Bug 241098 Summary: No gcc-gnat for ppc64 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241098 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 213111] upgrade fails because of RAID1 setup
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Jan '09

25 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213111 Chris Spencer <chrisspen(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chrisspen(a)gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Chris Spencer <chrisspen(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-25 13:00:16 EDT --- This bug is still present in F10. I tried upgrading from F8 to F10, and I received this same error. It's a show-stopper. Please re-open this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 249197] It's not possible to set speed with wodim
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jan '09

24 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249197 Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraun | |hofer.de --- Comment #6 from Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> 2009-01-24 17:55:57 EDT --- Wodim os known to have no peoper DVD sopport. Please just upgrade to recent original software from: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/ cdrecord supports DVD writing since February 1998 and for this reason is mature and knows how to work around formware bugs from various drives. A workaround for the formware bug in your PIONEER drive has been introduced in April 2007 in the original software. ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 246176] wodim returns random supported modes with sata drive and fails to burn
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jan '09

24 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246176 Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraun | |hofer.de --- Comment #5 from Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> 2009-01-24 17:50:08 EDT --- Wodim is known to have no proper DVD sopport, I recommend you to check recent original software from: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 212281] kernel 2.6.18 breaks setuid cdrecord
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jan '09

24 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212281 Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraun | |hofer.de --- Comment #7 from Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> 2009-01-24 17:43:43 EDT --- There is a workaround for this idiosyncratic behavior of the Linux Kernel. This workaround is available since January 2006 in the original software. Please note that you _definitely_ need root privileges in order to be able to correctly send all needed SCSI commands through Linux anyway. For a fiy, just uograde to recent original software from: ftp:/ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 171510] mkisofs doesn't preserve directory permissions
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jan '09

24 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171510 Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraun | |hofer.de --- Comment #11 from Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> 2009-01-24 17:38:31 EDT --- genisoimage is based on a very old and outdated mkisofs version. You most likely did not use the original software. As the original software is well maintained software, there have been many bug fixes for mkisofs during the past 3 years and the patch mentioned above is just one of many bugfixes needed in order to support correct file/directory permissions in the resulting filesystem tree. As the original mkisofs replaced ~30% of the source code for bug fixes and feature enhencements, it does not make sense to use the outdated close shipped by RedHat. I recommend you to upgrade to recent original software from ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecprd/alpha/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 365111] gdb's "return VAL" command appears to misbehave
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jan '09

24 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365111 --- Comment #10 from Jim Meyering <meyering(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-24 12:39:00 EDT --- Thanks! I've applied it to the latest archer sources, built, and confirmed that the example above now works as expected. i.e., no segfault. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 327601] Make hid2hci only start for selected systems
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jan '09

24 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327601 --- Comment #8 from Alex Kanavin <ak(a)sensi.org> 2009-01-24 08:07:30 EDT --- Another option is to make the switch only if there's another keyboard/mouse already connected - probably a small helper app should make that check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jan '09

24 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Felix Schwarz <felix.schwarz(a)oss.schwarz.eu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix.schwarz(a)oss.schwarz.e | |u -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 327651] improve daemon startup speed
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jan '09

23 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327651 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:40:47 EDT --- postfix-2.5.6-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update postfix'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0926 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 327651] improve daemon startup speed
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jan '09

23 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327651 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:35:46 EDT --- postfix-2.5.6-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update postfix'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0892 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 246481] Remove asciidoc build requirement
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jan '09

23 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246481 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:32:53 EDT --- mercurial-1.1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 225684] Merge Review: devhelp (stalled)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jan '09

23 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225684 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen(a)redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-23 19:13:01 EDT --- This can be approved, I think. The things listed in comment #1 have all been taken care of. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 208607] mkinitrd: iSCSI root requires crc32c module
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jan '09

23 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208607 --- Comment #29 from Eric Sandeen <esandeen(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-23 14:52:51 EDT --- (BTW: Despite the protestations above, I went ahead & built it in both as a quick fix, and because we seem to be on a track to build in more anyway, for fast-boot reasons. Still, this should be fixed in general! So apologies for hiding the problem, again.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 208607] mkinitrd: iSCSI root requires crc32c module
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jan '09

23 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208607 --- Comment #28 from Eric Sandeen <esandeen(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-23 14:50:34 EDT --- I've committed the config change to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 208607] mkinitrd: iSCSI root requires crc32c module
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jan '09

23 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208607 Eric Sandeen <esandeen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |esandeen(a)redhat.com --- Comment #27 from Eric Sandeen <esandeen(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-23 13:02:42 EDT --- This hits btrfs too, now. I may just bail on the fancy solutions and go ahead & build crc32c into the kernel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 218905] [ta_IN] Some conjunct characters not appearing with proper shape
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jan '09

23 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218905 Padmanabhan V. K. <bugzillas+padREMOVETHISdu(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzillas+padREMOVETHISdu@g | |mail.com --- Comment #4 from Padmanabhan V. K. <bugzillas+padREMOVETHISdu(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-23 12:20:22 EDT --- Please reopen this bug. The bleeding edge version of Pango still has U+0BB6's type as _xx instead of _ct: http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/pango/trunk/modules/indic/indic-ot-class-tables… and http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481203 is still open. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242607] Build with festival error.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jan '09

22 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-22 11:53:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329721) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329721) undefined-non-weak-symbol_festival-lib-1.96-7.fc10.x86_64.log There are lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol_festival in the festival-lib-1.96-7.fc10 package (running rpmlint fastival-lib on installed package). Theses symbols should be added at link time and could be the reason of runtime failures when the needed libraries aren't present at runtime. It will also prevents the linker to preload suches libraries which will degrade performances when loading. (since every symbol will be revolved at runtime). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 240233] Can't set display for <graphics type='sdl'/>
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jan '09

22 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240233 Daniel Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |berrange(a)redhat.com Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Daniel Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-22 08:07:34 EDT --- This was fixed in release 0.5.1 of libvirt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 431588] selinux denial messages from yum-cron updates
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '09

21 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431588 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:37:21 EDT --- yum-cron-0.8.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 167952] gcl doesn't build on ppc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '09

21 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167952 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:34:25 EDT --- gcl-2.6.8-0.1.20080902cvs.1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 167952] gcl doesn't build on ppc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '09

21 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167952 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 167952] gcl doesn't build on ppc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '09

21 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167952 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:33:18 EDT --- gcl-2.6.8-0.1.20080902cvs.1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '09

21 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '09

21 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:32:19 EDT --- libraw1394-2.0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 343321] multiarch conflicts in tomoe
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '09

21 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343321 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:29:43 EDT --- tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update tomoe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0770 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 431588] selinux denial messages from yum-cron updates
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '09

21 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431588 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 431588] selinux denial messages from yum-cron updates
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '09

21 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431588 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:29:13 EDT --- yum-cron-0.8.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 343321] multiarch conflicts in tomoe
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '09

21 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343321 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:29:04 EDT --- tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update tomoe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0760 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 212066] Anaconda tries to format my iPod
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '09

21 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212066 --- Comment #13 from Joel Andres Granados <jgranado(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-21 11:00:37 EDT --- Can't really use this in fedora devel as the code there is from parted 1.8.8 (latest upstream release), not master. discussion is ongoing in upstream, not a lot of attention though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 186759] No feedback at errors, meaningless '--help' screen, no documentation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '09

21 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186759 Patrice Dumas <pertusus(a)free.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|pertusus(a)free.fr | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 227283] pnmtofiasco can't read valid PNM files created by netpbm
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '09

21 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227283 Jindrich Novy <jnovy(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Jindrich Novy <jnovy(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-21 02:55:56 EDT --- pnmtofiasco, jpegtopnm and couple of others are now fixed in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 227283] pnmtofiasco can't read valid PNM files created by netpbm
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '09

21 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227283 Jindrich Novy <jnovy(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|6 |rawhide Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 134638] Add striping to lvm creation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Jan '09

20 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=134638 --- Comment #19 from Marc Bejarano <bugzilla.redhat(a)beej.org> 2009-01-20 20:29:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > If someone > can make a compelling case as to why we should do this, we'll consider changing > our minds hi, andy. the best reason that comes to mind for me is consistency. why allow some RAID levels and not others? since we already have a patch to enhance functionality, why not include it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 309281] RFE: add libmilter shared library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Jan '09

20 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309281 Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-20 13:56:22 EDT --- sendmail-8.14.3-4.fc11 now has shared libmilter. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 309281] RFE: add libmilter shared library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Jan '09

20 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309281 Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stuart(a)gathman.org --- Comment #8 from Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-20 13:54:52 EDT --- *** Bug 479325 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 178998] isapnp probing not working correctly
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '09

19 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178998 antonio montagnani <antonio.montagnani(a)alice.it> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|antonio.montagnani(a)alice.it | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 322651] Volume control with ALSA mixer puts both input and output devices under playback
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '09

19 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322651 Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-19 12:39:05 EDT --- This bug should be fixed with the new gnome-volume-control and gnome-volume-control-applet in rawhide, available in the gnome-media package. Please reopen if the problem persists with those versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 266061] Volume manager window is not the right size
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '09

19 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266061 Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-19 12:38:21 EDT --- This bug should be fixed with the new gnome-volume-control and gnome-volume-control-applet in rawhide, available in the gnome-media package. Please reopen if the problem persists with those versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '09

19 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 Peter Vrabec <pvrabec(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|pvrabec(a)redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 123335] xchat reconnects channels in wrong tabs after network outage.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '09

19 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=123335 --- Comment #21 from David Woodhouse <dwmw2(a)infradead.org> 2009-01-19 00:45:11 EDT --- Still happening in Fedora 10... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 343321] multiarch conflicts in tomoe
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jan '09

18 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343321 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-18 20:19:03 EDT --- tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 343321] multiarch conflicts in tomoe
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jan '09

18 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343321 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-18 20:19:00 EDT --- tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 292231] Green tiles in OpenGL on Radeon 9800 SE
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jan '09

18 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292231 Callum Lerwick <seg(a)haxxed.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Callum Lerwick <seg(a)haxxed.com> 2009-01-18 19:04:15 EDT --- Hmmm. This machine has been out of use for a while. It appears as of xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.8.0-14.fc9.i386 / kernel-2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686 this seems to have been fixed. But it wasn't updated for a while so I don't know that these were the first versions to fix it. I'm going to consider this fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 176790] Incorrect completion when quoting last component of path
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jan '09

18 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176790 --- Comment #20 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi> 2009-01-18 17:48:32 EDT --- Still present in Rawhide's 20080705-2.20090115bzr1252 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 365111] gdb's "return VAL" command appears to misbehave
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jan '09

18 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365111 --- Comment #9 from Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-18 17:23:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329309) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329309) Fix (w/o a testcase so far). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 365111] gdb's "return VAL" command appears to misbehave
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jan '09

18 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365111 --- Comment #8 from Jim Meyering <meyering(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-18 16:47:39 EDT --- P.S. I've just confirmed that this still afflicts F10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 365111] gdb's "return VAL" command appears to misbehave
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jan '09

18 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365111 Jim Meyering <meyering(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Component|glibc |gdb CC| |dvlasenk(a)redhat.com, | |jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com AssignedTo|jakub(a)redhat.com |jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com Resolution|WORKSFORME | Summary|failed allocation in output |gdb's "return VAL" command |stream initialization |appears to misbehave |causes segfault | --- Comment #7 from Jim Meyering <meyering(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-18 16:46:28 EDT --- Thanks. However, gdb's "return" ought to work. Having to simulate it with arch-specific register manipulations is not an option. reassigning to gdb and reopening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jan '09

18 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 --- Comment #29 from Paul Jenner <psj(a)familyjenner.co.uk> 2009-01-18 14:59:08 EDT --- libraw1394-2.0.0-6.fc10 works for me. I am able to use dvgrab to capture as non-root user with default permissions on the firewire devices: [psj@localhost ~]$ rpm -q libraw1394 libraw1394-2.0.0-6.fc10.i386 [psj@localhost ~]$ ls -ld /dev/fw* crw-rw---- 1 root root 248, 0 2009-01-18 08:43 /dev/fw0 crw-rw----+ 1 root root 248, 1 2009-01-18 19:46 /dev/fw1 [psj@localhost ~]$ getfacl /dev/fw* getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: dev/fw0 # owner: root # group: root user::rw- group::rw- other::--- # file: dev/fw1 # owner: root # group: root user::rw- user:psj:rw- group::rw- mask::rw- other::--- [psj@localhost ~]$ id uid=500(psj) gid=500(psj) groups=500(psj),503(music),504(photos),505(videos),506(shareddocs) context=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 [psj@localhost ~]$ dvgrab Found AV/C device with GUID 0x0080880307303c63 Warning: Cannot set RR-scheduler Warning: Cannot disable swapping Capture Started ^C"dvgrab-002.dv": 6.73 MiB 49 frames timecode 00:01:18.23 date 2009.01.18 09:18:59 Capture Stopped -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 167952] gcl doesn't build on ppc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jan '09

18 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167952 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-18 01:09:00 EDT --- gcl-2.6.8-0.1.20080902cvs.1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gcl-2.6.8-0.1.20080902cvs.1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 167952] gcl doesn't build on ppc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jan '09

18 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167952 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-18 01:08:48 EDT --- gcl-2.6.8-0.1.20080902cvs.1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gcl-2.6.8-0.1.20080902cvs.1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 443953] djvudigital requires ghostscript driver
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jan '09

16 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443953 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-16 22:56:02 EDT --- Will check in a while -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 168074] Double-clicking printer should work
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jan '09

16 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168074 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Component|gnome-print |gtk2 CC| |mclasen(a)redhat.com AssignedTo|davidz(a)redhat.com |mclasen(a)redhat.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE QAContact| |extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-16 21:42:53 EDT --- Works in gtk 2.15.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 349151] rename pkgconfig to pkg-config or add provides
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jan '09

16 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349151 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-16 21:30:03 EDT --- Lets try this again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jan '09

16 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:41:22 EDT --- libraw1394-2.0.0-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libraw1394'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0590 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jan '09

16 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:40:39 EDT --- libraw1394-2.0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libraw1394'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0574 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jan '09

15 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-15 10:33:09 EDT --- libraw1394-2.0.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libraw1394-2.0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242607] Build with festival error.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jan '09

14 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:52:28 EDT --- festival-1.96-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update festival'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0365 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 167952] gcl doesn't build on ppc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jan '09

14 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167952 Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loganjerry(a)gmail.com AssignedTo|gemi(a)bluewin.ch |loganjerry(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jan '09

14 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 17:08:44 EDT --- libraw1394-2.0.0-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libraw1394-2.0.0-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jan '09

14 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 --- Comment #24 from Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor(a)nexgo.de> 2009-01-14 14:23:21 EDT --- I just noticed that F11 (Rawhide) got a new libraw1394 with, if I understood correctly, the proposed patch. Jarod, any chance to get a similar update to F10? Thanks, pg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 418251] Packages in RPM Groups are only shown for level 2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jan '09

14 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=418251 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen(a)googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 418251] Packages in RPM Groups are only shown for level 2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jan '09

14 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=418251 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 21:03:47 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 219922] Internal "USR 3CP5610" modem not detected by "system-config-network"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '09

13 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219922 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 20:51:47 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #8 from Joachim Frieben <jfrieben(a)hotmail.com> 2009-01-13 16:43:59 EDT --- Hardware modem "USR 3CP5610" still not detected for current F10 w/updates but usable after manual selection of device /dev/ttyS2 read off from /var/log/dmesg. Relevant installed packages: - kernel-2.6.28-1.fc10.x86_64 - kudzu-1.2.85-1.x86_64 - system-config-network-1.5.95-1.fc10.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 356771] System changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '09

13 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #22 from Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-13 14:54:33 EDT --- Hmm, so I think I can close this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 356771] System changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '09

13 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 --- Comment #21 from Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-13 14:52:40 EDT --- Seems to me that America/Chicago is the right zone. It's central time (-6:00) and scheduled to U.S. rules. (For future reference, Monterrey is -6:00 CDT/CST just like Chicago, but is scheduled to Mexico rules.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 238044] /etc/udev/rules.d/90-alsa.rules calls /sbin/salsa without parameter
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '09

13 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238044 Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor(a)nexgo.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Comment #21 from Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor(a)nexgo.de> 2009-01-13 12:13:16 EDT --- Since I upgraded all the PCs to F10 and the issue does not seem to exist anymore, I close it. pg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 270381] Ice doesn't support ppc64
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '09

13 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=270381 Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |10 Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 213135] CVE-2008-2544 mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '09

13 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135 --- Comment #24 from Martin Cracauer <cracauer(a)cons.org> 2009-01-13 11:28:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #21) > > 2) of course a read-write mounted /chroot/proc will instantly turn security > > into a joke (as all processes, files and devices are accessible by anybody > > becoming root in the chroot). But most of these applications, while requiring > > a /proc, can live with a readonly /proc. > > If anybody in the chroot becomes root, she can escape chroot trivially without > /proc mounted at all. Read-only vs. read-write /proc mount does not influence > that much. > > > I strongly urge somebody who is running a recent Fedora to re-open this bug > > report after confirming which behavior it is showing now. > > Has this been fixed, or is this test incorrect? > > # uname -r > 2.6.27.9-159.fc10.x86_64 > > # mkdir -p /chroot/proc > > # mount -o ro -t proc proc /chroot/proc/ > > # cat /proc/mounts | grep '/proc proc' > /proc /proc proc rw 0 0 > proc /chroot/proc proc ro 0 0 > > # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward > > # echo 1 > /chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward > bash: /chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward: Read-only file system This looks good. I don't have FC anymore. My mainline 2.6.26.3 is still broken: mount -o -ro -t proc proc /mnt/tmp echo 1 > /mnt/tmp/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward # no complaints Any idea whether this is a 2.6.27 or a Redhat/Fedora fix? Thanks Martin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 213135] CVE-2008-2544 mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '09

13 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135 --- Comment #23 from Tomas Mraz <tmraz(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-13 03:55:10 EDT --- Yes, it seems to be fixed in current kernels. I've tested it with the 2.6.29-0.18.rc0.git9.fc11.x86_64 kernel and it is fixed there too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 213135] CVE-2008-2544 mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '09

13 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135 --- Comment #22 from Tomas Hoger <thoger(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-13 03:03:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > 2) of course a read-write mounted /chroot/proc will instantly turn security > into a joke (as all processes, files and devices are accessible by anybody > becoming root in the chroot). But most of these applications, while requiring > a /proc, can live with a readonly /proc. If anybody in the chroot becomes root, she can escape chroot trivially without /proc mounted at all. Read-only vs. read-write /proc mount does not influence that much. > I strongly urge somebody who is running a recent Fedora to re-open this bug > report after confirming which behavior it is showing now. Has this been fixed, or is this test incorrect? # uname -r 2.6.27.9-159.fc10.x86_64 # mkdir -p /chroot/proc # mount -o ro -t proc proc /chroot/proc/ # cat /proc/mounts | grep '/proc proc' /proc /proc proc rw 0 0 proc /chroot/proc proc ro 0 0 # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward # echo 1 > /chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward bash: /chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward: Read-only file system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 226329] Merge Review: pycairo (stalled)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '09

13 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226329 Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|roozbeh(a)gmail.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 448758] New: Grub sometimes does not detect entire memory map
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Jan '09

12 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448758 Summary: Grub sometimes does not detect entire memory map Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: grub AssignedTo: pjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: dustin.henning(a)prd-inc.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: amyagi@gmail.com,dustin.henning@prd- inc.com,eric.moret(a)gmail.com,fedora-triage- list@redhat.com,jm@ish.de,mishu@piatafinanciara.ro,natha n.robertson@gmail.com,rjones@redhat.com,sputhenp@redhat. com,tru(a)pasteur.fr +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #250299 +++ Description of problem: Sometimes, grub does not recognize the entire e820 memory map, when the map is not provided by the BIOS in the multiboot information data structure. Ultimately, this appears to be an over-optimization by the compiler when building grub, in combination with buggy BIOS. The result is that some downstream kernels (in my particular case, the Xen kernel) does not recognize all the memory available on a system. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): grub-0.97-13 How reproducible: >From the lack of discussion on the Fedora and Xen mailing lists, I presume this problem is rare in the real world, and may be hard to reproduce. The machine this happens on for me is has two Dual-Core AMD Opteron 2210 w/16GB of memory, using an American Megatrends BIOS. Upon boot on an unpatched grub, Xen only recognizes slightly less than 4GB. The Multiboot information data structure has flag for the mem_lower/mem_upper fields set (and Xen memory detection matches the values in these fields), and does not have the flag for memory map set. Patch to fix problem: --- grub-0.97/stage2/common.c.e820 2007-07-30 11:36:19.000000000 -0800 +++ grub-0.97/stage2/common.c 2007-07-30 11:36:55.000000000 -0800 @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ init_bios_info (void) { #ifndef STAGE1_5 - unsigned long cont, memtmp, addr; + unsigned long memtmp, addr; + volatile unsigned long cont; int drive; #endif -- Additional comment from peter.peltonen(a)gmail.com on 2007-08-14 08:56 EST -- I encountered the same problem with i386 and x86_64 CentOS5 + xen-enabled kernels. Only 2,9GB of my 6GB RAM was recognized. Non-xen 64bit and 32bit PAE-kernels saw the memory correctly. After patching grub with this patch and reinstalling grub (not just the rpm -- grub has to be reinstalled from grub prompt) all memory was recognized correctly. -- Additional comment from dustin.henning(a)prd-inc.com on 2007-10-23 13:14 EST -- I too experienced this issue. The system in question was a Core 2 Quad E6600 with 8GiB on an Intel P965 Express chipset. Like the original reporter, this system also utilizes an AMIBIOS. In my case, only 3.2GiB was recognized prior to the patch, and the base (SMP) kernel did not recognize the ful amount of memory until I added mem=10G to the kernel arguments. Once the base (SMP) kernel was booted detecting 7.8GiB, the problem did not reoccur when the kernel argument was removed. Said kernel argument (and derivatives) had no effect on the xen kernels when placed after either/both kernel lines (xen.gz and module vmlinuz). -- Additional comment from nathan.robertson(a)gmail.com on 2008-02-07 09:49 EST -- I too an experiencing this issue on an AMD64 machine with 8GBs of memory. Does anyone know if there is an updated Grub package with this patch applied? -- Additional comment from eric.moret(a)gmail.com on 2008-02-14 09:25 EST -- Any progress in applying this patch? I too have this issue. -- Additional comment from eric.moret(a)gmail.com on 2008-02-15 11:11 EST -- You can grab the fixed package at: ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/grub-0.97-14.x86_64.rpm SRPMS at ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/grub-0.97-14.src.rpm -- Additional comment from amyagi(a)gmail.com on 2008-02-15 11:29 EST -- (In reply to comment #5) > You can grab the fixed package at: > ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/grub-0.97-14.x86_64.rpm > SRPMS at > ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/grub-0.97-14.src.rpm Thanks for making the patched grub available. According to your note on the CentOS forum: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=12491&forum=38 you have fixed the problem on a Hetzner root server DS8000 ? -- Additional comment from grover66(a)gmail.com on 2008-02-17 00:35 EST -- After installing the above grub rpm, you will have to run "grub-install /dev/sda" (for example) to make it all work. -Mike -- Additional comment from eric.moret(a)gmail.com on 2008-03-20 02:41 EST -- (In reply to comment #6) > you have fixed the problem on a Hetzner root server DS8000 ? Yes, that is correct. I now have my 8Gb of RAM recognized on a Hetzner DS8000 -- Additional comment from steve(a)electricmint.com on 2008-05-07 02:18 EST -- (In reply to comment #5) > You can grab the fixed package at: > ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/grub-0.97-14.x86_64.rpm > SRPMS at > ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/grub-0.97-14.src.rpm Many thank for this patch Eric, it's also allowed me to see the 6GB on CentOS/Xen install on Core 2 Quad Acer. Steve -- Additional comment from drfatalis(a)hotmail.com on 2008-05-13 16:43 EST -- Hi there, I've got a Dell 1900 with CentOS 5.1 64 bit and 4 GB ram. Only 3 GB are recognized with kernel-xen-2.6.18-53.1.19.el5. I've downloaded & installed grub-0.97-14.x86_64.rpm and did grub- install /dev/sda. But it did not help and I still got 3 GB recognized. Can you please help me to fix this. Thank you in advance. -- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2008-05-14 09:47 EST -- This message is a reminder that Fedora 7 is nearing the end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 7. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '7'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 7's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 7 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. If possible, it is recommended that you try the newest available Fedora distribution to see if your bug still exists. Please read the Release Notes for the newest Fedora distribution to make sure it will meet your needs: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/ The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 8

[Bug 213135] CVE-2008-2544 mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Jan '09

12 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135 --- Comment #21 from Martin Cracauer <cracauer(a)cons.org> 2009-01-12 14:32:01 EDT --- This is definitely not fixed. Here is a summary of the issue. From memory, some details might be out of focus. 1) when using a chroot for any kind of non-trivial application, including web browsers and seti-at-home type applications you need a /proc, let's say you mount it to /chroot/proc. 2) of course a read-write mounted /chroot/proc will instantly turn security into a joke (as all processes, files and devices are accessible by anybody becoming root in the chroot). But most of these applications, while requiring a /proc, can live with a readonly /proc. So people like me want two procfs mounts: - /proc read-write - /chroot/proc read-only This is b0rked. 3) the Linux kernel, stock or Redhat, does not support multiple mounts of procfs with different permissions 4) in the mainline kernel, if you have an existing read-write mount to /proc and make a mount request to a read-only /chroot/proc, it will ignore the readonly flag silently and give you a read-write mounted /chroot/proc instead. 5) in redhat/fedora kernels around the time of my initial bug report, and presumably today: given an existing read-write mount to /proc and a mount request to a read-only /chroot/proc, it will downgrade /proc to read-only, effectively disabling the base system. I think the solution for this must be some kind of "wrapper" filesystem that can put a read-only layer on top of an existing filesystem. In any case, both behaviors as described in 4) and 5) are unacceptable. Silently giving read-write permissions on a read-only mount request is as wrong as silently downgrading an existing mount. %% I strongly urge somebody who is running a recent Fedora to re-open this bug report after confirming which behavior it is showing now. I had cut'n'pasteable reproducing commands in my original bug report and can supply them again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242999] On mga G400/G450, desktop-effects hangs on enabling effects
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Jan '09

12 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242999 John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |10 Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 436632] xorg locks up, no io, usually using firefox
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Jan '09

12 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436632 John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |10 Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 356771] System changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Jan '09

12 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 --- Comment #20 from Bryan Christ <bryan.christ(a)hp.com> 2009-01-12 12:06:09 EDT --- It was set to Americas/Montery. I think I need to eat more healthy--I must be running low on the common sense vitamin. What would be the best city to choose for Houston, TX which observes Central DST? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 277621] in dialog window moving focus from Button to text causes text to be highlighted
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Jan '09

12 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277621 --- Comment #8 from Ray Strode <rstrode(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-12 10:16:07 EDT --- it's a gtk feature. Labels can be marked selectable. Moving upstream is probably right if you want to see the behavior changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 248180] Xorg ~100% CPU upon resume from hibernation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Jan '09

12 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248180 Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|xgl-maint(a)redhat.com |airlied(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 277621] in dialog window moving focus from Button to text causes text to be highlighted
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Jan '09

12 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277621 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |MoveUpstream Version|8 |rawhide --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-12 00:07:23 EDT --- Still happens with current rawhide. Any comment on the behaviour before I attempt to file upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 213135] CVE-2008-2544 mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Jan '09

11 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135 --- Comment #20 from Eugene Teo (Security Response Team) <eteo(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-11 23:03:57 EDT --- Hmm, while F8 is already EOL, this doesn't seem to be fixed in F9 and F10 because there is no fix in upstream yet. Dave/Chuck, take note. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 213135] CVE-2008-2544 mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Jan '09

11 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135 Eugene Teo (Security Response Team) <eteo(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cebbert(a)redhat.com, | |davej(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 250299] Grub sometimes does not detect entire memory map
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Jan '09

11 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250299 --- Comment #14 from Vadym Chepkov <chepkov(a)yahoo.com> 2009-01-11 17:37:41 EDT --- Still an issue in Fedora-10, the proposed patch doesn't fix the issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 436632] xorg locks up, no io, usually using firefox
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Jan '09

11 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436632 --- Comment #16 from John Griffiths <fedora03(a)grifent.com> 2009-01-11 11:34:20 EDT --- Amazing that this has been zapped in light of my comment #13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 436632] xorg locks up, no io, usually using firefox
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Jan '09

11 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436632 --- Comment #15 from John Griffiths <fedora03(a)grifent.com> 2009-01-11 11:32:41 EDT --- Amazing that this has been zapped in light of my commnet #13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 248180] Xorg ~100% CPU upon resume from hibernation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Jan '09

11 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248180 --- Comment #8 from Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-11 08:04:17 EDT --- Disabling dri in xorg.conf and using the vbestate-restore quirk fixes resume for me. The only problem seems to be xvideo, which requires restarting Xorg to actually show a picture. The card is (--) R128(0): Chipset: "ATI Rage 128 Pro GL PF (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x5046) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 187328] KMid KPart does not load due to no exported symbols
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '09

10 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187328 Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|fedora(a)deadbabylon.de |kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #14 from Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> 2009-01-10 13:54:59 EDT --- I'm planning to fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '09

10 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 --- Comment #23 from Stefan Richter <stefan-r-rhbz(a)s5r6.in-berlin.de> 2009-01-10 13:35:07 EDT --- proposed patch: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.firewire.devel/12941 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 187328] KMid KPart does not load due to no exported symbols
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '09

10 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187328 --- Comment #13 from Steven M. Parrish <smparrish(a)shallowcreek.net> 2009-01-10 13:31:54 EDT --- Its now 2009, F10 is in the wild. Do you still plan on doing anything with this or should it be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 176790] Incorrect completion when quoting last component of path
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '09

10 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176790 Jonathan Wakely <fedoration(a)kayari.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely <fedoration(a)kayari.org> 2009-01-10 09:16:42 EDT --- how do i re-open this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 176790] Incorrect completion when quoting last component of path
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '09

10 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176790 Jonathan Wakely <fedoration(a)kayari.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|8 |10 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely <fedoration(a)kayari.org> 2009-01-10 09:15:13 EDT --- still present in F10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 250030] ethernet+modem pcmcia card not recognised
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '09

10 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250030 Philip Ashmore <contact(a)philipashmore.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |WORKSFORME --- Comment #28 from Philip Ashmore <contact(a)philipashmore.com> 2009-01-10 07:30:14 EDT --- I've changed the resolution of this bug to CLOSED - WORKSFORME. I'm the original reporter of this bug - if it wasn't for me you wouldn't have known about the problem. I also reported in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250030#c25 that I had resolved the problem. You've got to accept both together or neither. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 215369] pppd doest not fill default gateway address
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '09

10 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=215369 Marek GreÅ¡ko <gresko(a)thr.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|8 |10 --- Comment #7 from Marek GreÅ¡ko <gresko(a)thr.sk> 2009-01-10 06:57:43 EDT --- The previous state remains unchanged in Fedora 10 also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 --- Comment #22 from Curtis Doty <curtis(a)greenkey.net> 2009-01-09 23:16:22 EDT --- Zing! Pop. Peter, have we convinced you yet? Is there anything else we can do to help push a fix through? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 --- Comment #21 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> 2009-01-09 22:01:30 EDT --- *** Bug 478330 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mike(a)cchtml.com --- Comment #20 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> 2009-01-09 22:01:15 EDT --- XFS does not default to "relatime" so this breaks on people using XFS, such as myself, who want to use "relatime" in their fstab. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242999] On mga G400/G450, desktop-effects hangs on enabling effects
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242999 Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242999] On mga G400/G450, desktop-effects hangs on enabling effects
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242999 Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 250738] build patches for coolkey
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250738 Bob Relyea <rrelyea(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |10 Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #9 from Bob Relyea <rrelyea(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-09 15:25:17 EDT --- These patches may apply to the current coolkey, reopenning. bob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 247017] Initscript Review
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247017 Bob Relyea <rrelyea(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |10 Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #5 from Bob Relyea <rrelyea(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-09 15:23:00 EDT --- reopenning until I actually review the initscripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 247007] Initscript Review
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247007 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm(a)greysector.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 356771] System changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 --- Comment #19 from Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-09 13:33:03 EDT --- They syntax is correct, but bugzilla split it into two lines. The following is cut'n'paste friendly: find /usr/share/zoneinfo/ -type f -exec md5sum {} \;\ | grep `md5sum /etc/localtime | cut -d' ' -f1` If it still tells the same, that's interesting. Can you try to run the command as root? Also, could you give me the output of the following? $ ls --lcontext /etc/localtime -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 356771] System changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 --- Comment #18 from Bryan Christ <bryan.christ(a)hp.com> 2009-01-09 13:16:40 EDT --- rpm -q tzdata tzdata-2008i-1.fc10.noarch rpm -V tzdata (no output) maybe check the syntax of the this command you provide me: find /usr/share/zoneinfo/ -type f -exec md5sum {} \; | grep `md5sum /etc/localtime | cut -d' ' -f1` -bash: /etc/localtime: Permission denied -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 356771] System changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 Bryan Christ <bryan.christ(a)hp.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|F8 changed daylight time on |System changed daylight |October 28 based on old |time on October 28 based on |U.S. rules |old U.S. rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 356771] F8 changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 --- Comment #17 from Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-09 12:42:13 EDT --- First, check that your tzdata package is sound, and just for completeness sake, show me which version do you have: $ rpm -q tzdata $ rpm -V tzdata Next we need to determine where does /etc/localtime come from: $ find /usr/share/zoneinfo/ -type f -exec md5sum {} \; | grep `md5sum /etc/localtime | cut -d' ' -f1` The above may turn up a couple zones that all have the same md5sum, in which case use diff to check that the files are actually the same: $ diff /etc/localtime /usr/share/zoneinfo/The/Zone/ItFound If they are not the same (which is unlikely), or grep didn't find anything (which is quite possible), we know that /etc/localtime doesn't come from tzdata package. We can work from here to figure out why is glibc trigger failing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 204800] perl.prov script misparses some version information
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204800 Nigel Metheringham <nigel(a)dev.intechnology.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Nigel Metheringham <nigel(a)dev.intechnology.co.uk> 2009-01-09 12:14:24 EDT --- Looked at current F10 release. The perldeps.pl prog is now a much later version and should resolve the major issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 356771] F8 changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 --- Comment #16 from Bryan Christ <bryan.christ(a)hp.com> 2009-01-09 12:13:11 EDT --- Petr, I'm really not sure what the root cause is, all I can say for certain is that with F8, F9, and now with F10, the system time does not changed in accordance with U.S. DST. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 356771] F8 changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |10 Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 356771] F8 changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 --- Comment #15 from Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-09 12:06:31 EDT --- "It is still a problem" means what? That fedora consistently fails to switch DST as it should, or that libc consistently fails to update /etc/localtime according to tzdata updates? In both cases the bug could still be in either one of glibc, glibc trigger script, rpm, or tzdata, but at least it's something concrete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244520] system-config-display does not allow full range of resolution for monitor
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244520 --- Comment #16 from Chris Caudle <chris(a)chriscaudle.org> 2009-01-09 11:45:45 EDT --- While someone else reported this problem existing on an F10 installation, I no longer see this issue on a fresh install of F10 on the same hardware that had a problem with F7 and F8. Strictly from my experience I cannot support re-opening this under F10. I'm not familiar with the administration features of bugzilla, so I don't know if someone else can re-open under F10, or if this will have to be re-entered as a new bug if someone else is having problems under F10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 232437] Cannot browse a SMB server with 2000+ shares
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232437 --- Comment #8 from Bryan Christ <bryan.christ(a)hp.com> 2009-01-09 11:34:02 EDT --- Tomas, The server is a Windows server so there is no smb.conf. Also, the server is the property of our corporate IT department and I have no authority over it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 232437] Cannot browse a SMB server with 2000+ shares
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232437 --- Comment #7 from Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-09 11:08:23 EDT --- Hi Bryan, your setup is quite unusual, so I was wondering if you can provide smb.conf from the server where that large number of shares resides. It would help us with debugging. Otherwise I will try to create dumb 2000 shares on some Samba server here. Also, starting with F9 we've switched to gvfs which has quite different implementation of smb browsing. There are further samba browsing fixes in F10 updates repository: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11611 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 325251] [NetApp 5.2 bug] New Prio Patch required for NetApp
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=325251 Andrius Benokraitis <andriusb(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |10 Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 356771] F8 changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 --- Comment #14 from Bryan Christ <bryan.christ(a)hp.com> 2009-01-09 10:57:49 EDT --- Petr, Can you pls move this to F10 since it is still a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242999] On mga G400/G450, desktop-effects hangs on enabling effects
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242999 --- Comment #18 from Bryan Christ <bryan.christ(a)hp.com> 2009-01-09 10:57:03 EDT --- Kristian, Can you move this to F10 since it is still a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 232437] Cannot browse a SMB server with 2000+ shares
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232437 --- Comment #6 from Bryan Christ <bryan.christ(a)hp.com> 2009-01-09 10:55:36 EDT --- Tomas, Can you move this to F10 since it is still a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 206650] installation produces an error message when updating icon cache
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206650 Radek Bíba <rbiba(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Radek Bíba <rbiba(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-09 10:40:03 EDT --- This was apparently fixed silently at some point. Installation of krusader doesn't produce the error message anymore in F10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 221152] GFS2: Clean up of glock code
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221152 Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242607] Build with festival error.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-09 08:52:27 EDT --- festival-1.96-7.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/festival-1.96-7.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 229518] Add support for selinux samba_share_t file context
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229518 Nils Philippsen <nphilipp(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened |FutureFeature Version|10 |rawhide Status Whiteboard|bzcl34nup | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 221152] GFS2: Clean up of glock code
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221152 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide --- Comment #19 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 20:52:02 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 212869] udev inconsistant naming
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212869 Harald Hoyer <harald(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 247082] Initscript Review
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247082 Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup | --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> 2009-01-09 07:35:20 EDT --- Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 247073] Initscript Review
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247073 Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup | --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> 2009-01-09 07:34:55 EDT --- Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 247063] Initscript Review
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247063 Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup | --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> 2009-01-09 07:34:33 EDT --- Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 247027] Initscript Review
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247027 Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup | --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> 2009-01-09 07:34:08 EDT --- Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 247006] Initscript Review
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247006 Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup | --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> 2009-01-09 07:33:43 EDT --- Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 246881] Initscript Review
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246881 Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup | --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> 2009-01-09 07:33:08 EDT --- Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 246873] Initscript Review - autodir
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246873 Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | Summary|Initscript Review |Initscript Review - autodir Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup | --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> 2009-01-09 07:31:10 EDT --- Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 304261] autofs fails to mount cifs share
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304261 Ian Kent <ikent(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|8 |9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 287411] Kernel loses track of CWD of process
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287411 Ian Kent <ikent(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|8 |9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244992] signames.h may conserve obsolete information
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244992 Roman Rakus <rrakus(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244520] system-config-display does not allow full range of resolution for monitor
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244520 --- Comment #15 from Otto J. Makela <om(a)iki.fi> 2009-01-09 03:30:23 EDT --- Still, the same problem seen on a fresh installation of Fedora 10: Resolutions available to choose in system-config-display are not updated to reflect new monitor selection in hardware settings. Workaround is to manually edit the xorg.conf file, but if one does this, why bother with system-config-display in the first place? For example, I have an (automatically correctly detected) 1920×1080 monitor, for which "system-config-display --reconfig" suggests 1400×1050 as the best available resolution. This problem is complicated a bit by bug #477993 (system-config-display crashes while reading xorg.conf), a workaround is to use the --reconfig option. I can't change the status of this bug as I am not its owner, can someone else reopen it once again for Fedora 10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 229518] Add support for selinux samba_share_t file context
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229518 Christian Nolte <ch.nolte(a)noltec.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 229518] Add support for selinux samba_share_t file context
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229518 Christian Nolte <ch.nolte(a)noltec.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|8 |10 --- Comment #6 from Christian Nolte <ch.nolte(a)noltec.org> 2009-01-09 03:16:38 EDT --- What is the current status? It is currently a hassle for an unexperienced user to use this UI, because the shares won't wor "out-of-the-box" (tm). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 335501] Cannot get native resolution on attached LCD (particularly over DVI)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335501 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |9 Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #13 from Andrew Bartlett <abartlet(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-09 03:00:19 EDT --- This still happens with 9, I'll test 10 when I get a chance to upgrade -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 349151] rename pkgconfig to pkg-config or add provides
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349151 Rahul Sundaram <sundaram(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jan '09

08 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 Nicola Soranzo <nsoranzo(a)tiscali.it> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nsoranzo(a)tiscali.it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 216132] No possible to cancel cahnges in the TUI in non-English locale
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jan '09

07 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216132 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak(a)redhat.com |lkundrak(a)v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 208375] keyboard type keeps changing
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jan '09

07 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208375 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak(a)redhat.com |lkundrak(a)v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 191893] system-config-keyboard don't open in graphical mode
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jan '09

07 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191893 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak(a)redhat.com |lkundrak(a)v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 177301] system-config-keyboard is missing dependencies on newt and kudzu
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jan '09

07 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177301 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak(a)redhat.com |lkundrak(a)v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Jan '09

06 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Andrew McNabb <amcnabb(a)mcnabbs.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |amcnabb(a)mcnabbs.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Jan '09

06 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |elanthis(a)awesomeplay.com --- Comment #19 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-06 05:11:56 EDT --- *** Bug 475495 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 213042] gnome-terminal cursor defaults to blinking
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jan '09

05 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213042 John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 213042] gnome-terminal cursor defaults to blinking
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jan '09

05 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213042 --- Comment #8 from Tim "Taiwanese" Liim <timliim(a)alcatel-lucent.com> 2009-01-05 22:07:25 EDT --- This bug should be easy to fix. Try the following: - in the source tree, the file gnome-terminal-2.24.2/src/gnome-terminal.schemas.in change the key name /schemas/apps/gnome-terminal/profiles/Default/cursor_blink_mode string (type) system (default value) to /schemas/desktop/gnome/interface/cursor_blink bool (type) false (default value) (I thought cursor_blink_mode is now obsolete, so it's safe to replace it with cursor_blink.) (you may need to change owner translation, etc.) Here is how I think it would work: - during rpmbuild the file gnome-terminal-2.24.2/src/gnome-terminal.schemas.in (#1) becomes ./BUILD/gnome-terminal-2.24.2/src/gnome-terminal.schemas (#2) - during "rpm -i" #2 becomes /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-terminal.schemas (#3) - "rpm -q --scripts gnome-terminal" shows the following postinstall scriplet: gconftool-2 ... /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-terminal.schemas (#4) which reads the value from #3 and store it in /etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/%gconf-tree.xml (#5) - during run-time, gnome-terminal reads value from gconfd-2, which reads default values from #5. I tried this in my private build, and it did the trick when I tried it on my F10. The same issue (cursor default to blinking) is still in F10 official release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jan '09

05 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad(a)users.sourceforge.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mw_triad(a)users.sourceforge. | |net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jan '09

05 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 David Dillow <dave(a)thedillows.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dave(a)thedillows.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 248180] Xorg ~100% CPU upon resume from hibernation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jan '09

05 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248180 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mlichvar(a)redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 20:57:17 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jan '09

05 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|235704 |446452 --- Comment #18 from Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-05 05:13:10 EDT --- While it is true that it is meant to be default, a valid option in fstab should NOT break nash's ability to boot the system. This should be fixed in nash. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jan '09

05 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |haanjdj(a)gmail.com --- Comment #17 from Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-05 05:11:17 EDT --- *** Bug 430280 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jan '09

05 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource(a)till.name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jan '09

05 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jan '09

04 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | Summary|nash mount should support |[PATCH] nash mount should |relatime |support relatime -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 296361] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jan '09

04 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Jayson King <bugzilla2(a)jaysonking.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #328155|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #16 from Jayson King <bugzilla2(a)jaysonking.org> 2009-01-04 18:36:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328162) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328162) adapt earlier patch for F10 mkinitrd As long as we're including linux/fs.h we can get rid of the other MS_* defines also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 453036] New: Build php-pecl-apc for EPEL 4
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jan '09

04 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453036 Summary: Build php-pecl-apc for EPEL 4 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: php-pecl-apc AssignedTo: rpm(a)timj.co.uk ReportedBy: rpm(a)timj.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: chabotc@xs4all.nl,fedora-triage-list@redhat.com Build php-pecl-apc for EPEL 4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 5

[Bug 296361] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jan '09

04 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 --- Comment #15 from Jayson King <bugzilla2(a)jaysonking.org> 2009-01-04 17:06:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328155) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328155) adapt earlier patch for F10 mkinitrd I don't know if there is a compelling reason to define the MS_* constants explicitly, but here's a patch for F10 mkinitrd that is an adaptation of the earlier patch with the change that it replaces #define MS_* with #include <linux/fs.h>. Tested on x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 296361] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jan '09

04 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Jayson King <bugzilla2(a)jaysonking.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla2(a)jaysonking.org --- Comment #14 from Jayson King <bugzilla2(a)jaysonking.org> 2009-01-04 16:50:34 EDT --- I recently ran into this as well. IMO nash should be able to handle relatime just as it handles the other flags (it does noatime, nodiratime, etc already). I adapted the patch here for F10, and it Just Works. Here are some thoughts that I have about this, though: 1) nash.c should include linux/fs.h, instead of defining its own MS_* constants. 2) mkinitrd should know about the flags that nash understands, and reject any that won't work, or at least warn the user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jan '09

04 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan(a)danny.cz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 186512] kernel prevents proper CD checking (mediacheck/install fails)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jan '09

04 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186512 --- Comment #42 from David Tonhofer <d.tonhofer(a)m-plify.com> 2009-01-04 10:18:40 EDT --- Thanks Andre, After retesting, any consistent explanation fell apart, and I am now pretty sure that it is just my DVD-ROM drive which does not work or which has some problem with the motherboard. Time burnt on a stupid problem, damn you non-self-checking hardware! Okay, out goes the drive... I'm not sure whether "ide=nodma" still has any effect whatsoever in F10, especially with SATA drives? The last time it was mentioned was in the Fedora Core 4 release notes at http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/fc4/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 186512] kernel prevents proper CD checking (mediacheck/install fails)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jan '09

03 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186512 --- Comment #41 from Andre Robatino <andre(a)bwh.harvard.edu> 2009-01-03 19:51:21 EDT --- The readahead bug should only affect reading the last few dozen KB of the disc image. You also need to be careful not to use dd to attempt to read off more than the actual size of the ISO. The rawread script at http://www.troubleshooters.com/linux/coasterless.htm reads off the correct amount automatically. It's very handy; I make it executable and put it in ~/bin so it's always available in my path. Using "ide=nodma" may or may not work, depending on your hardware (it usually didn't work for me). Doing the burning as recommended in the link above seems to be the only foolproof way to avoid the readahead bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 186512] kernel prevents proper CD checking (mediacheck/install fails)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jan '09

03 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186512 David Tonhofer <d.tonhofer(a)m-plify.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |d.tonhofer(a)m-plify.com --- Comment #40 from David Tonhofer <d.tonhofer(a)m-plify.com> 2009-01-03 19:15:39 EDT --- I seem to have hit this bug on Fedora 10. I thought the SCSI/SATA drivers had a bug until I found this report. Here we go: With an LG GDRH20N SATA DVD-ROM: -- Media Check fails 100% (tested DVDs, (live) CDs, several burns...) -- "Independent Media Check" using another system works (dump the ISO image, see below, then check the SHA1 sum against the official sum) -- Installation fails in a totally weird manner (e.g. at the very end, anaconda says "no kernel images installed" or arbitrary packages are not found) -- Starting the same system from a PATA drive found in the attic with the same media works nicely (installation not yet tried, will try) -- Media check passes if "ide=nodma" kernel option is given. Yowza! Additionally: -- Booting the system to Fedora 10 Live CD using aforementioned PATA drive, then dumping an ISO image (in this case, F10-x86_64-Live.iso) off the DVD-ROM if "ide=nodma" has NOT been set results in a: -- correctly-sized -- but slightly corrupted image The dump was done with "dd if=/dev/sr0 of=/tmp/corrupted.iso" It is probably not of big interest to know the exact differences, but a little perl program to cut the dump into 10K blocks and hash these, applied tp both original ISO and dumped ISO reveals 61 10K blocks with differences, *spread throughout the image* (not only the end affected). Now going to have drink or two. How to hash 10K blocks: #!/usr/bin/perl use Digest::MD5 qw(md5 md5_hex md5_base64); $file = $ARGV[0]; open(FILE,$file) or die "Could not open $file: $!\n"; binmode FILE; my $buffer; my $size = 1024*10; my $read; my $pos = 0; while (($read = read(FILE, $buffer, $size)) > 0) { my $digest = md5_hex($buffer); my $end = $pos + $size - 1; print "$digest [$pos,$end] $size\n"; $pos += $size; } close(FILE); -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 194249] CDs/DVDs encrypted with LUKS are not correctly mounted
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jan '09

03 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194249 --- Comment #19 from Mike <mike.cloaked(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-03 17:02:41 EDT --- Ahh OK - with pam_mount installed then mount.crypt and umount.crypt do work as per #14 - however I get a request for the passphrase when the CD is loaded into the drive and again another request for the passphrase when I issue the mount.crypt command. Also going to the device list in the "computer" gui browser, and right clicking to eject the disk fails, but doing "eject /dev/cdrom" in the CLI does work. It would be nice if this could be cleaned up so it works in a smoother fashion. I know I could make a small script to mount and umount/eject but it would be nice to have this available by default, and it would also be nice to have this work such that on loading the CD, that the passphrase is requested, then at the same time a mount point entered so that the pam_mount is then executed "under the hood" - or is this a difficult facility to get working? I guess it would fail if an inappropriate mount point was specified but there could be a default such as /media/cdrom_crypt or somesuch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 194249] CDs/DVDs encrypted with LUKS are not correctly mounted
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jan '09

03 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194249 Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|8 |10 --- Comment #18 from Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> 2009-01-03 15:45:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > The mount works as per #13, but the suggestion from #14 does not as the command > line does not recognise mount.crypt You need to install pam_mount to get mount.crypt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 194249] CDs/DVDs encrypted with LUKS are not correctly mounted
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jan '09

03 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194249 --- Comment #17 from Mike <mike.cloaked(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-03 14:55:04 EDT --- Please can this be re-assigned to F10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 194249] CDs/DVDs encrypted with LUKS are not correctly mounted
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jan '09

03 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194249 --- Comment #16 from Mike <mike.cloaked(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-03 14:53:41 EDT --- Tested in F10 The mount works as per #13, but the suggestion from #14 does not as the command line does not recognise mount.crypt The file browser in gnome sees the encrypted volume and clicking it requests a passphrase but then fails to mount anything. Places in gnome again sees the encrypted drive and requests a passphrase but again fails to mount saying there is no mount point specified. There are no messages in /var/log/messages indicating any connection to the mount for the CDROM. This needs to be remedied for F10/F11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 186512] kernel prevents proper CD checking (mediacheck/install fails)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jan '09

02 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186512 --- Comment #39 from Andre Robatino <andre(a)bwh.harvard.edu> 2009-01-02 16:57:36 EDT --- This has been seen by someone else in bug #448291. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 162774] strace ignores int3 SIGTRAP
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jan '09

02 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162774 --- Comment #13 from Roland McGrath <roland(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-02 14:58:42 EDT --- Since we are upstream maintainers, for Fedora strace I have always used fresh upstream releases. Neither this nor other bugs are so urgent they can't wait for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 162774] strace ignores int3 SIGTRAP
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jan '09

02 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162774 --- Comment #12 from Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-02 08:43:22 EDT --- The fix is in upstream CVS now. Taking into account that this isn't a hot potato (strace users were coping with inability to handle SIGTRAPs for many years), I am contemplating just waiting till upstream code will trickle into Fedora updates / new Fedora release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jan '09

02 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 --- Comment #22 from Stefan Richter <stefan-r-rhbz(a)s5r6.in-berlin.de> 2009-01-02 07:09:26 EDT --- Re comment 17: See http://marc.info/?l=linux1394-devel&m=123089504900333 --- David Moore pointed out that libraw1394 accesses the local node(s) in order to determine how many controllers are present. Furthermore, the local node is used as the default node for several operations which many libraw1394 clients need, even though a different node (e.g. camcorder) could be used for their purposes. We should be able to fix most of these issues by modifications to libraw1394. Remaining issues require kernel driver changes, but these don't affect dvgrab, kino, and similar high-level applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage January 2009