Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197455
--- Comment #20 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> 2008-09-13 00:24:33 EDT ---
Yeah, after all the years, this bug finally seems to be fixed:
# uname -a
Linux manus 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i586 #1 SMP Wed Sep 3 03:05:01 EDT 2008 i586 i586
i386 GNU/Linux
# dmesg | grep -i'f0 0f'
Intel Pentium with F0 0F bug - workaround enabled.
# cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -i 'f00f'
f00f_bug : yes
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440580
Summary: no gpm mouse support in mc
Product: Fedora
Version: 8
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: mc
AssignedTo: jnovy(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: stsp(a)aknet.ru
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com,leonard-rh-
bugzilla@den.ottolander.nl,stsp@aknet.ru
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #194593 +++
Description of problem:
Mouse doesn't work in mc. "ldd /usr/bin/mc" doesn't list libgpm,
so the mouse obviously is not expeced to work. This is quite bad,
unless I am missing something obvious.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
mc-4.6.1a-13.FC5
How reproducible:
Press the left mouse button and move the mouse. Only the gpm text
selection happens. You can't go to menu or move the mc cursor with
the mouse.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456393
Summary: RFE: version of pgf in texlive is old
Product: Fedora
Version: 9
Platform: All
URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgf/
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: texlive-texmf
AssignedTo: jnovy(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: uckelman(a)nomic.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de,fedora-triage-
list@redhat.com,pertusus@free.fr
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #219146 +++
Description of problem:
Version 1.10 of pgf is packaged with texlive; the current version of pgf (2.0)
is two years newer and has far more features.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
texlive-texmf-2007-22.fc9.noarch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481147
Summary: cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: cpan2rpm
AssignedTo: gavin.henry(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: gavin.brown(a)uk.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com, gavin.henry(a)gmail.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Clone Of: 279251
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #279251 +++
Description of problem:
The latest version of Pod::Text from CPAN is from RRA/podlators-2.2.2.tar.gz
Pod::Text no longer derives from Pod::Parser so the method 'interpolate' does
not exist. As near as I can tell, this is the only method used in cpan2rpm, so
Pod::Text can be changed to Pod::Parser in the two places it appears. This is
what I did locally and it now works for me.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
cpan2rpm-2.028-2.fc8.1.noarch
How reproducible:
update Pod::Text via cpan.
Run cpan2rpm for some module (any will do...)
Actual results:
[...]
-- module: /var/cache/cpan/build/libwww-perl-5.808-baHtIL --
Metadata retrieval
Can't locate object method "interpolate" via package "Pod::Text" at
/usr/bin/cpan2rpm line 522.
-- Done --
Expected results:
No failure from above.
Additional info:
--- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2008-05-14
10:14:55 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 7 is nearing the end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and
issuing updates for Fedora 7. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports
from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be
closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '7'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to
fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a
later Fedora version prior to Fedora 7's end of life.
Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may
not be able to fix it before Fedora 7 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of
Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug. If you are unable to change the
version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent
Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them
obsolete. If possible, it is recommended that you try the newest available
Fedora distribution to see if your bug still exists.
Please read the Release Notes for the newest Fedora distribution to make sure
it will meet your needs:
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/
The process we are following is described here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
--- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2008-06-16
22:19:58 EDT ---
Fedora 7 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on June 13, 2008.
Fedora 7 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not
receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we
are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version
of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=185862
Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |RAWHIDE
--- Comment #19 from Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-31 07:01:27 EDT ---
Fixed in rpm-4.6.0-0.rc4.2.fc11, %_sharedstatedir gets set to /var/lib in the
linux-platform macros now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246
--- Comment #27 from Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-31 04:56:36 EDT ---
I don't see what's do difficult about this. Just don't use the old grub conf,
have a separate template file.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232522
--- Comment #22 from Jiri Skala <jskala(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-31 03:21:03 EDT ---
Please, use rpm file directly.
Jiri
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232522
--- Comment #21 from Don Russell <fedora(a)drussell.dnsalias.com> 2009-01-30 18:24:29 EDT ---
It will take me a few days (perhaps a week) to get to this. So I expect to be
able to give you a definitive answer NLT Mon 9 Feb.
Will this (your rebased version with my patches) be available on F9 via yum, or
do I need to d/l the rpm file directly?
Thanks,
I appreciate your work taking my changes forward.
Don Russell
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246
Eric Paris <eparis(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |eparis(a)redhat.com
Version|9 |rawhide
--- Comment #26 from Eric Paris <eparis(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-30 10:22:48 EDT ---
Moving to rawhide as I just got this error on an F11 pre alpha install and then
tried to use yum to update my kernel.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232522
Jiri Skala <jskala(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|needinfo?(jskala(a)redhat.com |
|) |
--- Comment #20 from Jiri Skala <jskala(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-30 08:50:20 EDT ---
Hi,
I re-based F-9 to 1.1.36 and applied your patches. The build is
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=80916
Please, let me know if the build mgetty-1.1.36-1.fc9 is ok. Then I'll apply it
to F10 and rawhide and I'll send it to upstream.
Cheers,
Jiri
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196151
--- Comment #18 from Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-30 07:23:33 EDT ---
Oddly, this remains an issue on my work desktop machine -- which was originally
installed with Fedora $whatever-was-current in January 2006 and upgraded ever
since -- but is not an issue on my laptop or netbook, both of which have fresh
Fedora 10 installs. What's the difference?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190209
Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|rawhide |10
Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
--- Comment #19 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 20:49:19 EDT ---
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10
development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
--- Comment #20 from Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-30 04:02:28 EDT ---
Hmm actually this is fixed in F10 (since last July): the conflict behavior is
consistent, which is what the original request was - colored files are allowed
to overlap whether in same transaction or not, and for everything else
conflicts are always raised.
Eliminating the "sharing" of colored files is another issue.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250299
Petri T. Koistinen <petri.koistinen(a)iki.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |petri.koistinen(a)iki.fi
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227283
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:11:35 EDT ---
netpbm-10.35.58-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227283
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227283
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:08:47 EDT ---
netpbm-10.35.58-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=324721
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=324721
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:04:03 EDT ---
gnome-settings-daemon-2.24.1-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266061
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Beland <beland(a)alum.mit.edu> 2009-01-29 02:37:13 EDT ---
Confirmed; in gnome-media-2.25.5-1.fc11.x86_64, for example, the interface has
gotten a radical overhaul and the slider layout is now simpler. Thanks for the
update!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213042
--- Comment #9 from Tim "Taiwanese" Liim <timliim(a)alcatel-lucent.com> 2009-01-28 17:29:36 EDT ---
Does the proposal in Comment #8 make sense to you?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229141
Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br
--- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-28 14:11:36 EDT ---
I will try to fix this in this next weekend.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202823
Kamil Dudka <kdudka(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
CC| |ovasik(a)redhat.com
Fixed In Version| |coreutils-7.0-7.fc11
Resolution| |RAWHIDE
AssignedTo|ovasik(a)redhat.com |kdudka(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #7 from Kamil Dudka <kdudka(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-28 13:27:08 EDT ---
Fixed in rawhide. Note that cp -a still doesn't copy user/root xattrs. The
appropriate cp option is --preserve=xattr. mv always preserves xattrs, install
never preserves xattrs.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263241
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> 2009-01-28 11:02:11 EDT ---
Indeed, unfortunately, libntlm doesn't export the MD4 functions. Maybe we could
get the author to change that?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263241
Robert Townley <rob.townley(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rob.townley(a)gmail.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251062
Tony Fu <tfu(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|alan(a)redhat.com |peterm(a)redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
Michel Alexandre Salim <michel.sylvan(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |michel.sylvan(a)gmail.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249197
--- Comment #8 from Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> 2009-01-26 18:22:37 EDT ---
You are of course not allowed to do that, but why do you like
to put parts of the official free software into your fork that
cannot be legally distributed because your fork is in conflict
with GPL and Copyright?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243172
Brian Maly <bmaly(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |needinfo?
--- Comment #7 from Brian Maly <bmaly(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-26 13:46:07 EDT ---
The most common cause of this problem is a misconfigured APIC and most often
the APIC is misconfigured before boot (by the BIOS).
Can we verify the BIOS is not the culprit? Please verify the BIOS with Linux
Firmware Kit. Download the latest ISO and boot off CD.
Download from -> http://linuxfirmwarekit.org/download.php
Also, can you attach a /var/log/dmesg from the affected hardware?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186527
Dennis Wagelaar <dennis.wagelaar(a)vub.ac.be> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dennis.wagelaar(a)vub.ac.be
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249197
--- Comment #7 from Harald Hoyer <harald(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-26 04:54:51 EDT ---
Am I allowd to extract the patch from the CDDL version and apply it to the GPL
version? I don't think so.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254126
Bug 254126 depends on bug 241098, which changed state.
Bug 241098 Summary: No gcc-gnat for ppc64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241098
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |RAWHIDE
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213111
Chris Spencer <chrisspen(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |chrisspen(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #11 from Chris Spencer <chrisspen(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-25 13:00:16 EDT ---
This bug is still present in F10. I tried upgrading from F8 to F10, and I
received this same error. It's a show-stopper. Please re-open this ticket.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249197
Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraun
| |hofer.de
--- Comment #6 from Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> 2009-01-24 17:55:57 EDT ---
Wodim os known to have no peoper DVD sopport.
Please just upgrade to recent original software from:
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/
cdrecord supports DVD writing since February 1998 and
for this reason is mature and knows how to work around
formware bugs from various drives.
A workaround for the formware bug in your PIONEER
drive has been introduced in April 2007 in the original
software.
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246176
Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraun
| |hofer.de
--- Comment #5 from Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> 2009-01-24 17:50:08 EDT ---
Wodim is known to have no proper DVD sopport, I recommend you to check
recent original software from:
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212281
Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraun
| |hofer.de
--- Comment #7 from Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> 2009-01-24 17:43:43 EDT ---
There is a workaround for this idiosyncratic behavior of the
Linux Kernel. This workaround is available since January 2006
in the original software.
Please note that you _definitely_ need root privileges in order
to be able to correctly send all needed SCSI commands through Linux
anyway.
For a fiy, just uograde to recent original software from:
ftp:/ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171510
Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraun
| |hofer.de
--- Comment #11 from Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> 2009-01-24 17:38:31 EDT ---
genisoimage is based on a very old and outdated mkisofs
version.
You most likely did not use the original software.
As the original software is well maintained software, there
have been many bug fixes for mkisofs during the past 3 years
and the patch mentioned above is just one of many bugfixes
needed in order to support correct file/directory permissions
in the resulting filesystem tree.
As the original mkisofs replaced ~30% of the source code for
bug fixes and feature enhencements, it does not make sense
to use the outdated close shipped by RedHat.
I recommend you to upgrade to recent original software from
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecprd/alpha/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365111
--- Comment #10 from Jim Meyering <meyering(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-24 12:39:00 EDT ---
Thanks! I've applied it to the latest archer sources, built, and confirmed
that the example above now works as expected. i.e., no segfault.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327601
--- Comment #8 from Alex Kanavin <ak(a)sensi.org> 2009-01-24 08:07:30 EDT ---
Another option is to make the switch only if there's another keyboard/mouse
already connected - probably a small helper app should make that check.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
Felix Schwarz <felix.schwarz(a)oss.schwarz.eu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |felix.schwarz(a)oss.schwarz.e
| |u
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327651
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:40:47 EDT ---
postfix-2.5.6-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update postfix'. You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0926
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327651
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:35:46 EDT ---
postfix-2.5.6-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update postfix'. You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0892
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246481
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:32:53 EDT ---
mercurial-1.1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225684
Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mclasen(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-23 19:13:01 EDT ---
This can be approved, I think.
The things listed in comment #1 have all been taken care of.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208607
--- Comment #29 from Eric Sandeen <esandeen(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-23 14:52:51 EDT ---
(BTW: Despite the protestations above, I went ahead & built it in both as a
quick fix, and because we seem to be on a track to build in more anyway, for
fast-boot reasons. Still, this should be fixed in general! So apologies for
hiding the problem, again.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208607
--- Comment #28 from Eric Sandeen <esandeen(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-23 14:50:34 EDT ---
I've committed the config change to rawhide.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208607
Eric Sandeen <esandeen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |esandeen(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #27 from Eric Sandeen <esandeen(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-23 13:02:42 EDT ---
This hits btrfs too, now.
I may just bail on the fancy solutions and go ahead & build crc32c into the
kernel.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607
--- Comment #26 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-22 11:53:33 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=329721)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329721)
undefined-non-weak-symbol_festival-lib-1.96-7.fc10.x86_64.log
There are lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol_festival
in the festival-lib-1.96-7.fc10 package (running rpmlint fastival-lib on
installed package).
Theses symbols should be added at link time and could be the reason of runtime
failures when the needed libraries aren't present at runtime. It will also
prevents the linker to preload suches libraries which will degrade performances
when loading. (since every symbol will be revolved at runtime).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240233
Daniel Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
CC| |berrange(a)redhat.com
Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-22 08:07:34 EDT ---
This was fixed in release 0.5.1 of libvirt.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431588
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:37:21 EDT ---
yum-cron-0.8.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167952
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:34:25 EDT ---
gcl-2.6.8-0.1.20080902cvs.1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167952
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167952
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:33:18 EDT ---
gcl-2.6.8-0.1.20080902cvs.1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:32:19 EDT ---
libraw1394-2.0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343321
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:29:43 EDT ---
tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update tomoe'. You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0770
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431588
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431588
--- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:29:13 EDT ---
yum-cron-0.8.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343321
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:29:04 EDT ---
tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update tomoe'. You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0760
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212066
--- Comment #13 from Joel Andres Granados <jgranado(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-21 11:00:37 EDT ---
Can't really use this in fedora devel as the code there is from parted 1.8.8
(latest upstream release), not master. discussion is ongoing in upstream, not
a lot of attention though.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186759
Patrice Dumas <pertusus(a)free.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|pertusus(a)free.fr |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227283
Jindrich Novy <jnovy(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |RAWHIDE
--- Comment #5 from Jindrich Novy <jnovy(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-21 02:55:56 EDT ---
pnmtofiasco, jpegtopnm and couple of others are now fixed in rawhide.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227283
Jindrich Novy <jnovy(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|6 |rawhide
Keywords| |Reopened
Resolution|WONTFIX |
Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=134638
--- Comment #19 from Marc Bejarano <bugzilla.redhat(a)beej.org> 2009-01-20 20:29:35 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> If someone
> can make a compelling case as to why we should do this, we'll consider changing
> our minds
hi, andy. the best reason that comes to mind for me is consistency. why allow
some RAID levels and not others? since we already have a patch to enhance
functionality, why not include it?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309281
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |RAWHIDE
--- Comment #9 from Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-20 13:56:22 EDT ---
sendmail-8.14.3-4.fc11 now has shared libmilter. Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309281
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |stuart(a)gathman.org
--- Comment #8 from Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-20 13:54:52 EDT ---
*** Bug 479325 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178998
antonio montagnani <antonio.montagnani(a)alice.it> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|antonio.montagnani(a)alice.it |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322651
Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |RAWHIDE
--- Comment #12 from Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-19 12:39:05 EDT ---
This bug should be fixed with the new gnome-volume-control and
gnome-volume-control-applet in rawhide, available in the gnome-media package.
Please reopen if the problem persists with those versions.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266061
Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |RAWHIDE
--- Comment #7 from Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-19 12:38:21 EDT ---
This bug should be fixed with the new gnome-volume-control and
gnome-volume-control-applet in rawhide, available in the gnome-media package.
Please reopen if the problem persists with those versions.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421
Peter Vrabec <pvrabec(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|pvrabec(a)redhat.com |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=123335
--- Comment #21 from David Woodhouse <dwmw2(a)infradead.org> 2009-01-19 00:45:11 EDT ---
Still happening in Fedora 10...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292231
Callum Lerwick <seg(a)haxxed.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
--- Comment #12 from Callum Lerwick <seg(a)haxxed.com> 2009-01-18 19:04:15 EDT ---
Hmmm. This machine has been out of use for a while. It appears as of
xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.8.0-14.fc9.i386 / kernel-2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686 this seems
to have been fixed. But it wasn't updated for a while so I don't know that
these were the first versions to fix it. I'm going to consider this fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176790
--- Comment #20 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi> 2009-01-18 17:48:32 EDT ---
Still present in Rawhide's 20080705-2.20090115bzr1252
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365111
--- Comment #8 from Jim Meyering <meyering(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-18 16:47:39 EDT ---
P.S. I've just confirmed that this still afflicts F10.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365111
Jim Meyering <meyering(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Keywords| |Reopened
Component|glibc |gdb
CC| |dvlasenk(a)redhat.com,
| |jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com
AssignedTo|jakub(a)redhat.com |jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com
Resolution|WORKSFORME |
Summary|failed allocation in output |gdb's "return VAL" command
|stream initialization |appears to misbehave
|causes segfault |
--- Comment #7 from Jim Meyering <meyering(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-18 16:46:28 EDT ---
Thanks. However, gdb's "return" ought to work. Having to simulate it with
arch-specific register manipulations is not an option. reassigning to gdb and
reopening.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073
--- Comment #29 from Paul Jenner <psj(a)familyjenner.co.uk> 2009-01-18 14:59:08 EDT ---
libraw1394-2.0.0-6.fc10 works for me.
I am able to use dvgrab to capture as non-root user with default permissions on
the firewire devices:
[psj@localhost ~]$ rpm -q libraw1394
libraw1394-2.0.0-6.fc10.i386
[psj@localhost ~]$ ls -ld /dev/fw*
crw-rw---- 1 root root 248, 0 2009-01-18 08:43 /dev/fw0
crw-rw----+ 1 root root 248, 1 2009-01-18 19:46 /dev/fw1
[psj@localhost ~]$ getfacl /dev/fw*
getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names
# file: dev/fw0
# owner: root
# group: root
user::rw-
group::rw-
other::---
# file: dev/fw1
# owner: root
# group: root
user::rw-
user:psj:rw-
group::rw-
mask::rw-
other::---
[psj@localhost ~]$ id
uid=500(psj) gid=500(psj)
groups=500(psj),503(music),504(photos),505(videos),506(shareddocs)
context=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
[psj@localhost ~]$ dvgrab
Found AV/C device with GUID 0x0080880307303c63
Warning: Cannot set RR-scheduler
Warning: Cannot disable swapping
Capture Started
^C"dvgrab-002.dv": 6.73 MiB 49 frames timecode 00:01:18.23 date 2009.01.18
09:18:59
Capture Stopped
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443953
--- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-16 22:56:02 EDT ---
Will check in a while
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168074
Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Component|gnome-print |gtk2
CC| |mclasen(a)redhat.com
AssignedTo|davidz(a)redhat.com |mclasen(a)redhat.com
Resolution| |RAWHIDE
QAContact| |extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-16 21:42:53 EDT ---
Works in gtk 2.15.0
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349151
Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-16 21:30:03 EDT ---
Lets try this again.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:41:22 EDT ---
libraw1394-2.0.0-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libraw1394'. You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0590
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ON_QA
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:40:39 EDT ---
libraw1394-2.0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libraw1394'. You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0574
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:52:28 EDT ---
festival-1.96-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update festival'. You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0365
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167952
Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |loganjerry(a)gmail.com
AssignedTo|gemi(a)bluewin.ch |loganjerry(a)gmail.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073
--- Comment #24 from Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor(a)nexgo.de> 2009-01-14 14:23:21 EDT ---
I just noticed that F11 (Rawhide) got a new libraw1394 with, if I understood
correctly, the proposed patch.
Jarod, any chance to get a similar update to F10?
Thanks,
pg
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=418251
Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen(a)googlemail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED
Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=418251
Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|rawhide |10
--- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 21:03:47 EDT ---
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10
development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219922
Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|rawhide |10
--- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 20:51:47 EDT ---
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10
development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
--- Comment #8 from Joachim Frieben <jfrieben(a)hotmail.com> 2009-01-13 16:43:59 EDT ---
Hardware modem "USR 3CP5610" still not detected for current F10 w/updates but
usable after manual selection of device /dev/ttyS2 read off from
/var/log/dmesg. Relevant installed packages:
- kernel-2.6.28-1.fc10.x86_64
- kudzu-1.2.85-1.x86_64
- system-config-network-1.5.95-1.fc10.noarch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771
Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |NOTABUG
--- Comment #22 from Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-13 14:54:33 EDT ---
Hmm, so I think I can close this one.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771
--- Comment #21 from Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-13 14:52:40 EDT ---
Seems to me that America/Chicago is the right zone. It's central time (-6:00)
and scheduled to U.S. rules.
(For future reference, Monterrey is -6:00 CDT/CST just like Chicago, but is
scheduled to Mexico rules.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238044
Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor(a)nexgo.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #21 from Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor(a)nexgo.de> 2009-01-13 12:13:16 EDT ---
Since I upgraded all the PCs to F10 and the issue does not seem to exist
anymore, I close it.
pg
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=270381
Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |10
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135
--- Comment #24 from Martin Cracauer <cracauer(a)cons.org> 2009-01-13 11:28:54 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> (In reply to comment #21)
> > 2) of course a read-write mounted /chroot/proc will instantly turn security
> > into a joke (as all processes, files and devices are accessible by anybody
> > becoming root in the chroot). But most of these applications, while requiring
> > a /proc, can live with a readonly /proc.
>
> If anybody in the chroot becomes root, she can escape chroot trivially without
> /proc mounted at all. Read-only vs. read-write /proc mount does not influence
> that much.
>
> > I strongly urge somebody who is running a recent Fedora to re-open this bug
> > report after confirming which behavior it is showing now.
>
> Has this been fixed, or is this test incorrect?
>
> # uname -r
> 2.6.27.9-159.fc10.x86_64
>
> # mkdir -p /chroot/proc
>
> # mount -o ro -t proc proc /chroot/proc/
>
> # cat /proc/mounts | grep '/proc proc'
> /proc /proc proc rw 0 0
> proc /chroot/proc proc ro 0 0
>
> # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>
> # echo 1 > /chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> bash: /chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward: Read-only file system
This looks good.
I don't have FC anymore. My mainline 2.6.26.3 is still broken:
mount -o -ro -t proc proc /mnt/tmp
echo 1 > /mnt/tmp/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
# no complaints
Any idea whether this is a 2.6.27 or a Redhat/Fedora fix?
Thanks
Martin
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135
--- Comment #23 from Tomas Mraz <tmraz(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-13 03:55:10 EDT ---
Yes, it seems to be fixed in current kernels. I've tested it with the
2.6.29-0.18.rc0.git9.fc11.x86_64 kernel and it is fixed there too.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135
--- Comment #22 from Tomas Hoger <thoger(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-13 03:03:00 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> 2) of course a read-write mounted /chroot/proc will instantly turn security
> into a joke (as all processes, files and devices are accessible by anybody
> becoming root in the chroot). But most of these applications, while requiring
> a /proc, can live with a readonly /proc.
If anybody in the chroot becomes root, she can escape chroot trivially without
/proc mounted at all. Read-only vs. read-write /proc mount does not influence
that much.
> I strongly urge somebody who is running a recent Fedora to re-open this bug
> report after confirming which behavior it is showing now.
Has this been fixed, or is this test incorrect?
# uname -r
2.6.27.9-159.fc10.x86_64
# mkdir -p /chroot/proc
# mount -o ro -t proc proc /chroot/proc/
# cat /proc/mounts | grep '/proc proc'
/proc /proc proc rw 0 0
proc /chroot/proc proc ro 0 0
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
# echo 1 > /chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
bash: /chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward: Read-only file system
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226329
Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|roozbeh(a)gmail.com |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448758
Summary: Grub sometimes does not detect entire memory map
Product: Fedora
Version: 8
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: grub
AssignedTo: pjones(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: dustin.henning(a)prd-inc.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: amyagi@gmail.com,dustin.henning@prd-
inc.com,eric.moret(a)gmail.com,fedora-triage-
list@redhat.com,jm@ish.de,mishu@piatafinanciara.ro,natha
n.robertson@gmail.com,rjones@redhat.com,sputhenp@redhat.
com,tru(a)pasteur.fr
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #250299 +++
Description of problem:
Sometimes, grub does not recognize the entire e820 memory map, when the map is
not provided by the BIOS in the multiboot information data structure.
Ultimately, this appears to be an over-optimization by the compiler when
building grub, in combination with buggy BIOS.
The result is that some downstream kernels (in my particular case, the Xen
kernel) does not recognize all the memory available on a system.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
grub-0.97-13
How reproducible:
>From the lack of discussion on the Fedora and Xen mailing lists, I presume this
problem is rare in the real world, and may be hard to reproduce.
The machine this happens on for me is has two Dual-Core AMD Opteron 2210 w/16GB
of memory, using an American Megatrends BIOS. Upon boot on an unpatched grub,
Xen only recognizes slightly less than 4GB. The Multiboot information data
structure has flag for the mem_lower/mem_upper fields set (and Xen memory
detection matches the values in these fields), and does not have the flag for
memory map set.
Patch to fix problem:
--- grub-0.97/stage2/common.c.e820 2007-07-30 11:36:19.000000000 -0800
+++ grub-0.97/stage2/common.c 2007-07-30 11:36:55.000000000 -0800
@@ -142,6 +142,7 @@
init_bios_info (void)
{
#ifndef STAGE1_5
- unsigned long cont, memtmp, addr;
+ unsigned long memtmp, addr;
+ volatile unsigned long cont;
int drive;
#endif
-- Additional comment from peter.peltonen(a)gmail.com on 2007-08-14 08:56 EST --
I encountered the same problem with i386 and x86_64 CentOS5 + xen-enabled
kernels. Only 2,9GB of my 6GB RAM was recognized. Non-xen 64bit and 32bit
PAE-kernels saw the memory correctly. After patching grub with this patch and
reinstalling grub (not just the rpm -- grub has to be reinstalled from grub
prompt) all memory was recognized correctly.
-- Additional comment from dustin.henning(a)prd-inc.com on 2007-10-23 13:14 EST --
I too experienced this issue. The system in question was a Core 2 Quad E6600
with 8GiB on an Intel P965 Express chipset. Like the original reporter, this
system also utilizes an AMIBIOS.
In my case, only 3.2GiB was recognized prior to the patch, and the base (SMP)
kernel did not recognize the ful amount of memory until I added mem=10G to the
kernel arguments. Once the base (SMP) kernel was booted detecting 7.8GiB, the
problem did not reoccur when the kernel argument was removed. Said kernel
argument (and derivatives) had no effect on the xen kernels when placed after
either/both kernel lines (xen.gz and module vmlinuz).
-- Additional comment from nathan.robertson(a)gmail.com on 2008-02-07 09:49 EST --
I too an experiencing this issue on an AMD64 machine with 8GBs of memory. Does
anyone know if there is an updated Grub package with this patch applied?
-- Additional comment from eric.moret(a)gmail.com on 2008-02-14 09:25 EST --
Any progress in applying this patch? I too have this issue.
-- Additional comment from eric.moret(a)gmail.com on 2008-02-15 11:11 EST --
You can grab the fixed package at:
ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/grub-0.97-14.x86_64.rpm
SRPMS at
ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/grub-0.97-14.src.rpm
-- Additional comment from amyagi(a)gmail.com on 2008-02-15 11:29 EST --
(In reply to comment #5)
> You can grab the fixed package at:
> ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/grub-0.97-14.x86_64.rpm
> SRPMS at
> ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/grub-0.97-14.src.rpm
Thanks for making the patched grub available. According to your note on the
CentOS forum:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=12491&forum=38
you have fixed the problem on a Hetzner root server DS8000 ?
-- Additional comment from grover66(a)gmail.com on 2008-02-17 00:35 EST --
After installing the above grub rpm, you will have to run "grub-install
/dev/sda" (for example) to make it all work.
-Mike
-- Additional comment from eric.moret(a)gmail.com on 2008-03-20 02:41 EST --
(In reply to comment #6)
> you have fixed the problem on a Hetzner root server DS8000 ?
Yes, that is correct. I now have my 8Gb of RAM recognized on a Hetzner DS8000
-- Additional comment from steve(a)electricmint.com on 2008-05-07 02:18 EST --
(In reply to comment #5)
> You can grab the fixed package at:
> ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/grub-0.97-14.x86_64.rpm
> SRPMS at
> ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/grub-0.97-14.src.rpm
Many thank for this patch Eric, it's also allowed me to see the 6GB on
CentOS/Xen install on Core 2 Quad Acer.
Steve
-- Additional comment from drfatalis(a)hotmail.com on 2008-05-13 16:43 EST --
Hi there,
I've got a Dell 1900 with CentOS 5.1 64 bit and 4 GB ram.
Only 3 GB are recognized with kernel-xen-2.6.18-53.1.19.el5.
I've downloaded & installed grub-0.97-14.x86_64.rpm and did grub-
install /dev/sda.
But it did not help and I still got 3 GB recognized.
Can you please help me to fix this.
Thank you in advance.
-- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2008-05-14 09:47
EST --
This message is a reminder that Fedora 7 is nearing the end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and
issuing updates for Fedora 7. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports
from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be
closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '7'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to
fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a
later Fedora version prior to Fedora 7's end of life.
Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may
not be able to fix it before Fedora 7 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of
Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug. If you are unable to change the
version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent
Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them
obsolete. If possible, it is recommended that you try the newest available
Fedora distribution to see if your bug still exists.
Please read the Release Notes for the newest Fedora distribution to make sure
it will meet your needs:
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/
The process we are following is described here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135
--- Comment #21 from Martin Cracauer <cracauer(a)cons.org> 2009-01-12 14:32:01 EDT ---
This is definitely not fixed.
Here is a summary of the issue. From memory, some details might be out of
focus.
1) when using a chroot for any kind of non-trivial application, including web
browsers and seti-at-home type applications you need a /proc, let's say you
mount it to /chroot/proc.
2) of course a read-write mounted /chroot/proc will instantly turn security
into a joke (as all processes, files and devices are accessible by anybody
becoming root in the chroot). But most of these applications, while requiring
a /proc, can live with a readonly /proc.
So people like me want two procfs mounts:
- /proc read-write
- /chroot/proc read-only
This is b0rked.
3) the Linux kernel, stock or Redhat, does not support multiple mounts of
procfs with different permissions
4) in the mainline kernel, if you have an existing read-write mount to /proc
and make a mount request to a read-only /chroot/proc, it will ignore the
readonly flag silently and give you a read-write mounted /chroot/proc instead.
5) in redhat/fedora kernels around the time of my initial bug report, and
presumably today: given an existing read-write mount to /proc and a mount
request to a read-only /chroot/proc, it will downgrade /proc to read-only,
effectively disabling the base system.
I think the solution for this must be some kind of "wrapper" filesystem that
can put a read-only layer on top of an existing filesystem.
In any case, both behaviors as described in 4) and 5) are unacceptable.
Silently giving read-write permissions on a read-only mount request is as wrong
as silently downgrading an existing mount.
%%
I strongly urge somebody who is running a recent Fedora to re-open this bug
report after confirming which behavior it is showing now. I had
cut'n'pasteable reproducing commands in my original bug report and can supply
them again.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242999
John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |10
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436632
John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |10
Keywords| |Reopened
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771
--- Comment #20 from Bryan Christ <bryan.christ(a)hp.com> 2009-01-12 12:06:09 EDT ---
It was set to Americas/Montery. I think I need to eat more healthy--I must be
running low on the common sense vitamin.
What would be the best city to choose for Houston, TX which observes Central
DST?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277621
--- Comment #8 from Ray Strode <rstrode(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-12 10:16:07 EDT ---
it's a gtk feature. Labels can be marked selectable. Moving upstream is
probably right if you want to see the behavior changed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248180
Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|xgl-maint(a)redhat.com |airlied(a)redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277621
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |MoveUpstream
Version|8 |rawhide
--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-12 00:07:23 EDT ---
Still happens with current rawhide.
Any comment on the behaviour before I attempt to file upstream?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135
--- Comment #20 from Eugene Teo (Security Response Team) <eteo(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-11 23:03:57 EDT ---
Hmm, while F8 is already EOL, this doesn't seem to be fixed in F9 and F10
because there is no fix in upstream yet. Dave/Chuck, take note.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135
Eugene Teo (Security Response Team) <eteo(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cebbert(a)redhat.com,
| |davej(a)redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250299
--- Comment #14 from Vadym Chepkov <chepkov(a)yahoo.com> 2009-01-11 17:37:41 EDT ---
Still an issue in Fedora-10, the proposed patch doesn't fix the issue.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436632
--- Comment #16 from John Griffiths <fedora03(a)grifent.com> 2009-01-11 11:34:20 EDT ---
Amazing that this has been zapped in light of my comment #13.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436632
--- Comment #15 from John Griffiths <fedora03(a)grifent.com> 2009-01-11 11:32:41 EDT ---
Amazing that this has been zapped in light of my commnet #13.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248180
--- Comment #8 from Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-11 08:04:17 EDT ---
Disabling dri in xorg.conf and using the vbestate-restore quirk fixes resume
for me. The only problem seems to be xvideo, which requires restarting Xorg to
actually show a picture.
The card is
(--) R128(0): Chipset: "ATI Rage 128 Pro GL PF (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x5046)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187328
Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|fedora(a)deadbabylon.de |kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org
--- Comment #14 from Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> 2009-01-10 13:54:59 EDT ---
I'm planning to fix it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187328
--- Comment #13 from Steven M. Parrish <smparrish(a)shallowcreek.net> 2009-01-10 13:31:54 EDT ---
Its now 2009, F10 is in the wild. Do you still plan on doing anything with
this or should it be closed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176790
Jonathan Wakely <fedoration(a)kayari.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely <fedoration(a)kayari.org> 2009-01-10 09:16:42 EDT ---
how do i re-open this?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176790
Jonathan Wakely <fedoration(a)kayari.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|8 |10
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely <fedoration(a)kayari.org> 2009-01-10 09:15:13 EDT ---
still present in F10
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250030
Philip Ashmore <contact(a)philipashmore.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|WONTFIX |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #28 from Philip Ashmore <contact(a)philipashmore.com> 2009-01-10 07:30:14 EDT ---
I've changed the resolution of this bug to CLOSED - WORKSFORME.
I'm the original reporter of this bug - if it wasn't for me you wouldn't have
known about the problem.
I also reported in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250030#c25
that I had resolved the problem.
You've got to accept both together or neither.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=215369
Marek GreĂ…Â¡ko <gresko(a)thr.sk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|8 |10
--- Comment #7 from Marek GreĂ…Â¡ko <gresko(a)thr.sk> 2009-01-10 06:57:43 EDT ---
The previous state remains unchanged in Fedora 10 also.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
--- Comment #22 from Curtis Doty <curtis(a)greenkey.net> 2009-01-09 23:16:22 EDT ---
Zing! Pop.
Peter, have we convinced you yet? Is there anything else we can do to help push
a fix through?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
--- Comment #21 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> 2009-01-09 22:01:30 EDT ---
*** Bug 478330 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mike(a)cchtml.com
--- Comment #20 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> 2009-01-09 22:01:15 EDT ---
XFS does not default to "relatime" so this breaks on people using XFS, such as
myself, who want to use "relatime" in their fstab.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242999
Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain
type| |
Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain
type| |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242999
Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain
type| |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250738
Bob Relyea <rrelyea(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |10
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--- Comment #9 from Bob Relyea <rrelyea(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-09 15:25:17 EDT ---
These patches may apply to the current coolkey, reopenning.
bob
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247017
Bob Relyea <rrelyea(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |10
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--- Comment #5 from Bob Relyea <rrelyea(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-09 15:23:00 EDT ---
reopenning until I actually review the initscripts.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247007
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm(a)greysector.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |rawhide
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771
--- Comment #19 from Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-09 13:33:03 EDT ---
They syntax is correct, but bugzilla split it into two lines. The following is
cut'n'paste friendly:
find /usr/share/zoneinfo/ -type f -exec md5sum {} \;\
| grep `md5sum /etc/localtime | cut -d' ' -f1`
If it still tells the same, that's interesting. Can you try to run the command
as root? Also, could you give me the output of the following?
$ ls --lcontext /etc/localtime
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771
--- Comment #18 from Bryan Christ <bryan.christ(a)hp.com> 2009-01-09 13:16:40 EDT ---
rpm -q tzdata
tzdata-2008i-1.fc10.noarch
rpm -V tzdata
(no output)
maybe check the syntax of the this command you provide me:
find /usr/share/zoneinfo/ -type f -exec md5sum {} \; | grep `md5sum
/etc/localtime | cut -d' ' -f1`
-bash: /etc/localtime: Permission denied
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771
Bryan Christ <bryan.christ(a)hp.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|F8 changed daylight time on |System changed daylight
|October 28 based on old |time on October 28 based on
|U.S. rules |old U.S. rules
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771
--- Comment #17 from Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-09 12:42:13 EDT ---
First, check that your tzdata package is sound, and just for completeness sake,
show me which version do you have:
$ rpm -q tzdata
$ rpm -V tzdata
Next we need to determine where does /etc/localtime come from:
$ find /usr/share/zoneinfo/ -type f -exec md5sum {} \; | grep `md5sum
/etc/localtime | cut -d' ' -f1`
The above may turn up a couple zones that all have the same md5sum, in which
case use diff to check that the files are actually the same:
$ diff /etc/localtime /usr/share/zoneinfo/The/Zone/ItFound
If they are not the same (which is unlikely), or grep didn't find anything
(which is quite possible), we know that /etc/localtime doesn't come from tzdata
package. We can work from here to figure out why is glibc trigger failing.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204800
Nigel Metheringham <nigel(a)dev.intechnology.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|WONTFIX |CURRENTRELEASE
--- Comment #13 from Nigel Metheringham <nigel(a)dev.intechnology.co.uk> 2009-01-09 12:14:24 EDT ---
Looked at current F10 release.
The perldeps.pl prog is now a much later version and should resolve the
major issues.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771
--- Comment #16 from Bryan Christ <bryan.christ(a)hp.com> 2009-01-09 12:13:11 EDT ---
Petr,
I'm really not sure what the root cause is, all I can say for certain is that
with F8, F9, and now with F10, the system time does not changed in accordance
with U.S. DST.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771
Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |10
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771
--- Comment #15 from Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-09 12:06:31 EDT ---
"It is still a problem" means what? That fedora consistently fails to switch
DST as it should, or that libc consistently fails to update /etc/localtime
according to tzdata updates? In both cases the bug could still be in either
one of glibc, glibc trigger script, rpm, or tzdata, but at least it's something
concrete.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244520
--- Comment #16 from Chris Caudle <chris(a)chriscaudle.org> 2009-01-09 11:45:45 EDT ---
While someone else reported this problem existing on an F10 installation, I no
longer see this issue on a fresh install of F10 on the same hardware that had a
problem with F7 and F8. Strictly from my experience I cannot support
re-opening this under F10. I'm not familiar with the administration features
of bugzilla, so I don't know if someone else can re-open under F10, or if this
will have to be re-entered as a new bug if someone else is having problems
under F10.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232437
--- Comment #8 from Bryan Christ <bryan.christ(a)hp.com> 2009-01-09 11:34:02 EDT ---
Tomas,
The server is a Windows server so there is no smb.conf. Also, the server is
the property of our corporate IT department and I have no authority over it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232437
--- Comment #7 from TomĂ¡Å¡ Bžatek <tbzatek(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-09 11:08:23 EDT ---
Hi Bryan,
your setup is quite unusual, so I was wondering if you can provide smb.conf
from the server where that large number of shares resides. It would help us
with debugging. Otherwise I will try to create dumb 2000 shares on some Samba
server here.
Also, starting with F9 we've switched to gvfs which has quite different
implementation of smb browsing. There are further samba browsing fixes in F10
updates repository:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11611
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=325251
Andrius Benokraitis <andriusb(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |10
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771
--- Comment #14 from Bryan Christ <bryan.christ(a)hp.com> 2009-01-09 10:57:49 EDT ---
Petr,
Can you pls move this to F10 since it is still a problem.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242999
--- Comment #18 from Bryan Christ <bryan.christ(a)hp.com> 2009-01-09 10:57:03 EDT ---
Kristian,
Can you move this to F10 since it is still a problem.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232437
--- Comment #6 from Bryan Christ <bryan.christ(a)hp.com> 2009-01-09 10:55:36 EDT ---
Tomas,
Can you move this to F10 since it is still a problem.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206650
Radek BĂba <rbiba(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|WONTFIX |RAWHIDE
--- Comment #7 from Radek BĂba <rbiba(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-09 10:40:03 EDT ---
This was apparently fixed silently at some point. Installation of krusader
doesn't produce the error message anymore in F10.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221152
Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |FutureFeature
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229518
Nils Philippsen <nphilipp(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|Reopened |FutureFeature
Version|10 |rawhide
Status Whiteboard|bzcl34nup |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221152
Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|rawhide |10
Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|10 |rawhide
--- Comment #19 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 20:52:02 EDT ---
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10
development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212869
Harald Hoyer <harald(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |rawhide
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247082
Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |rawhide
Resolution|WONTFIX |
Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup |
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> 2009-01-09 07:35:20 EDT ---
Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init
stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247073
Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |rawhide
Resolution|WONTFIX |
Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup |
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> 2009-01-09 07:34:55 EDT ---
Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init
stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247063
Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |rawhide
Resolution|WONTFIX |
Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup |
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> 2009-01-09 07:34:33 EDT ---
Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init
stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247027
Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |rawhide
Resolution|WONTFIX |
Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup |
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> 2009-01-09 07:34:08 EDT ---
Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init
stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247006
Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |rawhide
Resolution|WONTFIX |
Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup |
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> 2009-01-09 07:33:43 EDT ---
Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init
stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246881
Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |rawhide
Resolution|WONTFIX |
Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup |
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> 2009-01-09 07:33:08 EDT ---
Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init
stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246873
Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |rawhide
Keywords| |Reopened
Resolution|WONTFIX |
Summary|Initscript Review |Initscript Review - autodir
Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup |
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou <matthias(a)rpmforge.net> 2009-01-09 07:31:10 EDT ---
Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init
stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304261
Ian Kent <ikent(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|8 |9
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287411
Ian Kent <ikent(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|8 |9
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244992
Roman Rakus <rrakus(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |rawhide
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244520
--- Comment #15 from Otto J. Makela <om(a)iki.fi> 2009-01-09 03:30:23 EDT ---
Still, the same problem seen on a fresh installation of Fedora 10: Resolutions
available to choose in system-config-display are not updated to reflect new
monitor selection in hardware settings. Workaround is to manually edit the
xorg.conf file, but if one does this, why bother with system-config-display in
the first place?
For example, I have an (automatically correctly detected) 1920Ă—1080 monitor,
for which "system-config-display --reconfig" suggests 1400Ă—1050 as the best
available resolution.
This problem is complicated a bit by bug #477993 (system-config-display crashes
while reading xorg.conf), a workaround is to use the --reconfig option.
I can't change the status of this bug as I am not its owner, can someone else
reopen it once again for Fedora 10?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229518
Christian Nolte <ch.nolte(a)noltec.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229518
Christian Nolte <ch.nolte(a)noltec.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|8 |10
--- Comment #6 from Christian Nolte <ch.nolte(a)noltec.org> 2009-01-09 03:16:38 EDT ---
What is the current status? It is currently a hassle for an unexperienced user
to use this UI, because the shares won't wor "out-of-the-box" (tm).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335501
Andrew Bartlett <abartlet(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |9
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Bartlett <abartlet(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-09 03:00:19 EDT ---
This still happens with 9, I'll test 10 when I get a chance to upgrade
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349151
Rahul Sundaram <sundaram(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |rawhide
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073
Nicola Soranzo <nsoranzo(a)tiscali.it> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nsoranzo(a)tiscali.it
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216132
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|lkundrak(a)redhat.com |lkundrak(a)v3.sk
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208375
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|lkundrak(a)redhat.com |lkundrak(a)v3.sk
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191893
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|lkundrak(a)redhat.com |lkundrak(a)v3.sk
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177301
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|lkundrak(a)redhat.com |lkundrak(a)v3.sk
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
Andrew McNabb <amcnabb(a)mcnabbs.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |amcnabb(a)mcnabbs.org
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |elanthis(a)awesomeplay.com
--- Comment #19 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-06 05:11:56 EDT ---
*** Bug 475495 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213042
John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|9 |10
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213042
--- Comment #8 from Tim "Taiwanese" Liim <timliim(a)alcatel-lucent.com> 2009-01-05 22:07:25 EDT ---
This bug should be easy to fix. Try the following:
- in the source tree, the file
gnome-terminal-2.24.2/src/gnome-terminal.schemas.in
change the key name
/schemas/apps/gnome-terminal/profiles/Default/cursor_blink_mode
string (type)
system (default value)
to
/schemas/desktop/gnome/interface/cursor_blink
bool (type)
false (default value)
(I thought cursor_blink_mode is now obsolete, so
it's safe to replace it with cursor_blink.)
(you may need to change owner translation, etc.)
Here is how I think it would work:
- during rpmbuild the file
gnome-terminal-2.24.2/src/gnome-terminal.schemas.in (#1)
becomes
./BUILD/gnome-terminal-2.24.2/src/gnome-terminal.schemas (#2)
- during "rpm -i" #2 becomes
/etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-terminal.schemas (#3)
- "rpm -q --scripts gnome-terminal" shows the
following postinstall scriplet:
gconftool-2 ... /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-terminal.schemas (#4)
which reads the value from #3 and store it in
/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/%gconf-tree.xml (#5)
- during run-time, gnome-terminal reads value from gconfd-2,
which reads default values from #5.
I tried this in my private build, and it did the trick when I tried
it on my F10.
The same issue (cursor default to blinking) is still in F10 official
release.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad(a)users.sourceforge.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mw_triad(a)users.sourceforge.
| |net
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
David Dillow <dave(a)thedillows.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dave(a)thedillows.org
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248180
Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|rawhide |10
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mlichvar(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 20:57:17 EDT ---
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10
development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|235704 |446452
--- Comment #18 from Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-05 05:13:10 EDT ---
While it is true that it is meant to be default, a valid option in fstab should
NOT break nash's ability to boot the system. This should be fixed in nash.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |haanjdj(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #17 from Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-05 05:11:17 EDT ---
*** Bug 430280 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073
Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |opensource(a)till.name
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kwizart(a)gmail.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
Summary|nash mount should support |[PATCH] nash mount should
|relatime |support relatime
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
Jayson King <bugzilla2(a)jaysonking.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #328155|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #16 from Jayson King <bugzilla2(a)jaysonking.org> 2009-01-04 18:36:55 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=328162)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328162)
adapt earlier patch for F10 mkinitrd
As long as we're including linux/fs.h we can get rid of the other MS_* defines
also.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453036
Summary: Build php-pecl-apc for EPEL 4
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el4
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: php-pecl-apc
AssignedTo: rpm(a)timj.co.uk
ReportedBy: rpm(a)timj.co.uk
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: chabotc@xs4all.nl,fedora-triage-list@redhat.com
Build php-pecl-apc for EPEL 4
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
--- Comment #15 from Jayson King <bugzilla2(a)jaysonking.org> 2009-01-04 17:06:40 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=328155)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328155)
adapt earlier patch for F10 mkinitrd
I don't know if there is a compelling reason to define the MS_* constants
explicitly, but here's a patch for F10 mkinitrd that is an adaptation of the
earlier patch with the change that it replaces #define MS_* with #include
<linux/fs.h>.
Tested on x86_64.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361
Jayson King <bugzilla2(a)jaysonking.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bugzilla2(a)jaysonking.org
--- Comment #14 from Jayson King <bugzilla2(a)jaysonking.org> 2009-01-04 16:50:34 EDT ---
I recently ran into this as well. IMO nash should be able to handle relatime
just as it handles the other flags (it does noatime, nodiratime, etc already).
I adapted the patch here for F10, and it Just Works. Here are some thoughts
that I have about this, though:
1) nash.c should include linux/fs.h, instead of defining its own MS_*
constants.
2) mkinitrd should know about the flags that nash understands, and reject any
that won't work, or at least warn the user.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073
Dan HorĂ¡k <dan(a)danny.cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dan(a)danny.cz
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186512
--- Comment #42 from David Tonhofer <d.tonhofer(a)m-plify.com> 2009-01-04 10:18:40 EDT ---
Thanks Andre,
After retesting, any consistent explanation fell apart, and I am now pretty
sure that it is just my DVD-ROM drive which does not work or which has some
problem with the motherboard. Time burnt on a stupid problem, damn you
non-self-checking hardware! Okay, out goes the drive...
I'm not sure whether "ide=nodma" still has any effect whatsoever in F10,
especially with SATA drives? The last time it was mentioned was in the Fedora
Core 4 release notes at http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/fc4/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186512
--- Comment #41 from Andre Robatino <andre(a)bwh.harvard.edu> 2009-01-03 19:51:21 EDT ---
The readahead bug should only affect reading the last few dozen KB of the disc
image. You also need to be careful not to use dd to attempt to read off more
than the actual size of the ISO. The rawread script at
http://www.troubleshooters.com/linux/coasterless.htm
reads off the correct amount automatically. It's very handy; I make it
executable and put it in ~/bin so it's always available in my path.
Using "ide=nodma" may or may not work, depending on your hardware (it usually
didn't work for me). Doing the burning as recommended in the link above seems
to be the only foolproof way to avoid the readahead bug.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186512
David Tonhofer <d.tonhofer(a)m-plify.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |d.tonhofer(a)m-plify.com
--- Comment #40 from David Tonhofer <d.tonhofer(a)m-plify.com> 2009-01-03 19:15:39 EDT ---
I seem to have hit this bug on Fedora 10. I thought the SCSI/SATA drivers had a
bug until I found this report. Here we go:
With an LG GDRH20N SATA DVD-ROM:
-- Media Check fails 100% (tested DVDs, (live) CDs, several burns...)
-- "Independent Media Check" using another system works (dump the ISO
image, see below, then check the SHA1 sum against the official sum)
-- Installation fails in a totally weird manner
(e.g. at the very end, anaconda says "no kernel images installed" or
arbitrary packages are not found)
-- Starting the same system from a PATA drive found in the attic with
the same media works nicely (installation not yet tried, will try)
-- Media check passes if "ide=nodma" kernel option is given. Yowza!
Additionally:
-- Booting the system to Fedora 10 Live CD using aforementioned PATA
drive, then dumping an ISO image (in this case, F10-x86_64-Live.iso)
off the DVD-ROM if "ide=nodma" has NOT been set results in a:
-- correctly-sized
-- but slightly corrupted image
The dump was done with "dd if=/dev/sr0 of=/tmp/corrupted.iso"
It is probably not of big interest to know the exact differences,
but a little perl program to cut the dump into 10K blocks and hash
these, applied tp both original ISO and dumped ISO reveals 61 10K
blocks with differences, *spread throughout the image* (not only the
end affected).
Now going to have drink or two.
How to hash 10K blocks:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use Digest::MD5 qw(md5 md5_hex md5_base64);
$file = $ARGV[0];
open(FILE,$file) or die "Could not open $file: $!\n";
binmode FILE;
my $buffer;
my $size = 1024*10;
my $read;
my $pos = 0;
while (($read = read(FILE, $buffer, $size)) > 0) {
my $digest = md5_hex($buffer);
my $end = $pos + $size - 1;
print "$digest [$pos,$end] $size\n";
$pos += $size;
}
close(FILE);
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194249
--- Comment #19 from Mike <mike.cloaked(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-03 17:02:41 EDT ---
Ahh OK - with pam_mount installed then mount.crypt and umount.crypt do work as
per #14 - however I get a request for the passphrase when the CD is loaded into
the drive and again another request for the passphrase when I issue the
mount.crypt command.
Also going to the device list in the "computer" gui browser, and right clicking
to eject the disk fails, but doing "eject /dev/cdrom" in the CLI does work.
It would be nice if this could be cleaned up so it works in a smoother fashion.
I know I could make a small script to mount and umount/eject but it would be
nice to have this available by default, and it would also be nice to have this
work such that on loading the CD, that the passphrase is requested, then at the
same time a mount point entered so that the pam_mount is then executed "under
the hood" - or is this a difficult facility to get working? I guess it would
fail if an inappropriate mount point was specified but there could be a default
such as /media/cdrom_crypt or somesuch?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194249
Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|8 |10
--- Comment #18 from Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> 2009-01-03 15:45:38 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> The mount works as per #13, but the suggestion from #14 does not as the command
> line does not recognise mount.crypt
You need to install pam_mount to get mount.crypt
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194249
--- Comment #17 from Mike <mike.cloaked(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-03 14:55:04 EDT ---
Please can this be re-assigned to F10?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194249
--- Comment #16 from Mike <mike.cloaked(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-03 14:53:41 EDT ---
Tested in F10
The mount works as per #13, but the suggestion from #14 does not as the command
line does not recognise mount.crypt
The file browser in gnome sees the encrypted volume and clicking it requests a
passphrase but then fails to mount anything. Places in gnome again sees the
encrypted drive and requests a passphrase but again fails to mount saying there
is no mount point specified.
There are no messages in /var/log/messages indicating any connection to the
mount for the CDROM.
This needs to be remedied for F10/F11
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186512
--- Comment #39 from Andre Robatino <andre(a)bwh.harvard.edu> 2009-01-02 16:57:36 EDT ---
This has been seen by someone else in bug #448291.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162774
--- Comment #13 from Roland McGrath <roland(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-02 14:58:42 EDT ---
Since we are upstream maintainers, for Fedora strace I have always used fresh
upstream releases. Neither this nor other bugs are so urgent they can't wait
for that.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162774
--- Comment #12 from Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-02 08:43:22 EDT ---
The fix is in upstream CVS now. Taking into account that this isn't a hot
potato (strace users were coping with inability to handle SIGTRAPs for many
years), I am contemplating just waiting till upstream code will trickle into
Fedora updates / new Fedora release.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073
--- Comment #22 from Stefan Richter <stefan-r-rhbz(a)s5r6.in-berlin.de> 2009-01-02 07:09:26 EDT ---
Re comment 17:
See http://marc.info/?l=linux1394-devel&m=123089504900333 --- David Moore
pointed out that libraw1394 accesses the local node(s) in order to determine
how many controllers are present. Furthermore, the local node is used as the
default node for several operations which many libraw1394 clients need, even
though a different node (e.g. camcorder) could be used for their purposes. We
should be able to fix most of these issues by modifications to libraw1394.
Remaining issues require kernel driver changes, but these don't affect dvgrab,
kino, and similar high-level applications.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.