[Bug 179072] _dl_debug_state() RT_CONSISTENT called too early
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179072
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|schwab(a)redhat.com |law(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> 2011-11-14 14:45:37 EST ---
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning
to the new owner of this component.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 10 months
[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246
--- Comment #68 from Tomasz Torcz <zdzichu(a)irc.pl> 2011-11-14 03:55:40 EST ---
This error can have various cases. Originally it was caused by some funky use
of device pointers in btrfs.
What you are seeing right know probably is not an error. grubby updates all
grub config file it finds - /boot/grub/menu.lst and /boot/grub2/grub.cfg. After
going to F16 with grub2, you probably have grub1 config empty. The error
emitted is from parsing empty grub1 config. As you shown, grub2 config file is
updated correctly.
If you delete grub1 config file, warning should go away.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 10 months
[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246
Lars E. Pettersson <lars(a)homer.se> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lars(a)homer.se
--- Comment #66 from Lars E. Pettersson <lars(a)homer.se> 2011-11-14 03:23:03 EST ---
Just did an update of Fedora 16 on a x86_64 machine and got the same message:
Updating : kernel-tools-3.1.1-1.fc16.x86_64 13/26
Installing : kernel-3.1.1-1.fc16.x86_64 14/26
grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
Cleanup : kernel-headers-3.1.0-7.fc16.x86_64 15/26
(no further errors showed up)
This was the first kernel update on my Fedora 16 installation, updated from
kernel 3.1.0-7.fc16.x86_64 to 3.1.1-1.fc16.x86_64 using the following grub
packages:
# rpm -qa grub*
grub-efi-0.97-84.fc16.x86_64
grub2-1.99-12.fc16.x86_64
grubby-8.3-1.fc16.x86_64
#
And the following templates (verified OK with rpm -V)
# ll /etc/grub.d/
total 80
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 6709 Oct 27 03:19 00_header
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 5959 Oct 27 03:19 10_linux
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 5875 Oct 27 03:19 20_linux_xen
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 5960 Oct 27 03:19 30_os-prober
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 214 Oct 27 03:19 40_custom
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 95 Oct 27 03:19 41_custom
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1259 Oct 27 03:19 90_persistent
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 483 Oct 27 03:19 README
#
The only strange thing noted in /etc/grub2.cfg was the lack of the recovery
mode entry:
# grep menuentry /etc/grub2.cfg
menuentry 'Fedora (3.1.1-1.fc16.x86_64)' --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class
os {
menuentry 'Linux, with Linux 3.1.0-7.fc16.x86_64' --class gnu-linux --class gnu
--class os {
menuentry 'Linux, with Linux 3.1.0-7.fc16.x86_64 (recovery mode)' --class
gnu-linux --class gnu --class os {
menuentry "Microsoft Windows XP Professional (on /dev/sda2)" --class windows
--class os {
(/etc/grub2.cfg will be attached)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 10 months
[Bug 204448] RPM verify not functional: "file's dependencies has changed since prelinking"
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204448
David Tonhofer <d.tonhofer(a)m-plify.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |d.tonhofer(a)m-plify.com
--- Comment #17 from David Tonhofer <d.tonhofer(a)m-plify.com> 2011-11-13 20:40:00 EST ---
Happening on Red Hat 5.7, after an upgrade from 5.6 and a manual "prelink" run.
While doing "rpm --verify" on all packages:
prelink: /usr/lib64/libpspell.so.15.1.3: at least one of file's dependencies
has changed since prelinking
prelink: /usr/lib/libaudiofile.so.0.0.2: at least one of file's dependencies
has changed since prelinking
prelink: /usr/lib/libesd.so.0.2.36: at least one of file's dependencies has
changed since prelinking
prelink: /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4.1.0: at least one of file's dependencies has
changed since prelinking
prelink: /usr/lib64/libgd.so.2.0.0: at least one of file's dependencies has
changed since prelinking
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 10 months