February 2011 - triage - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-02-22 08:26:01 EST --- festival-1.96-18.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/festival-1.96-18.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 242607] Build with festival error.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 242607] Build with festival error.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607 --- Comment #36 from Tim Niemueller <tim(a)niemueller.de> 2011-02-22 07:50:59 EST --- Situation is currently being resolved, cf. fedora-devel list by the nonresponsive maintainer process (which we do not need to initiate as it seems). I have now commit permissions and commited the fix for this bug. I will now build in Koji and push updates. From there we can go on. Is anyone here who worked on the package in the past and is interested in having a look at the latest upstream release 2.1, in particular which of the 19 patches and numerous sources are still required, which have been upstreamed, and which should be upstreamed? I'd really like to see this package in a better shape with far less patches, closer to upstream, and not being a de-facto in-package fork. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 242607] Build with festival error.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607 --- Comment #35 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2011-02-22 03:47:02 EST --- Any improvements for this bug ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

needinfo canceled: [Bug 593340] RFE: Allow setting syslog facility for audisp syslog plugin

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: audit Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> has canceled Bug Zapper <triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>'s request for needinfo: Bug 593340: RFE: Allow setting syslog facility for audisp syslog plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593340

13 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 250919] IPV6_PRIVACY=rfc3041 in /etc/sysconfig/networking/devices/ifcfg-eth0 does not take effect

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250919 Daniel Roesen <dr(a)cluenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Triaged | --- Comment #32 from Daniel Roesen <dr(a)cluenet.de> 2011-02-21 03:36:44 EST --- Also removing the Triaged keyword as the bug has been reopened. To my understanding of the Triaged description, it was prolly set when this bug got auto-closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 250919] IPV6_PRIVACY=rfc3041 in /etc/sysconfig/networking/devices/ifcfg-eth0 does not take effect

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250919 Daniel Roesen <dr(a)cluenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dr(a)cluenet.de Version|12 |13 --- Comment #31 from Daniel Roesen <dr(a)cluenet.de> 2011-02-21 03:34:54 EST --- IPv6 addressing privacy concerns are making the press by now. Linux and MacOS being pointed out as being "problematic by default" as most (all?) Linux distros don't enable IPv6 Privacy Extensions by default. I'm going to raise another bug to get this hopefully changed in Fedora, but as far as I can see, there's still infrastructure work to be done, according to what I read here. Is there any chance of that getting any traction? Changing release to F13 as per Russells comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

needinfo canceled: [Bug 561525] nagios loses path to plugins on 'service nagios reload'

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: nagios Bill McGonigle <bill-bugzilla.redhat.com(a)bfccomputing.com> has canceled Bug Zapper <triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>'s request for needinfo: Bug 561525: nagios loses path to plugins on 'service nagios reload' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561525 ------- Additional Comments from Bill McGonigle <bill-bugzilla.redhat.com(a)bfccomputing.com> same on f14

13 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 199246] [enh] support bridges

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199246 --- Comment #19 from Andrew Luecke <auzy83(a)gmail.com> 2011-02-16 04:51:03 EST --- I'd be happy to sponsor it a bit too.. There are only a few major annoyances left in Fedora, and this is one of them. It couldn't be too hard considering even mobiles these days act as Mobile AP's. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 199246] [enh] support bridges

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199246 johnny.westerlund(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |johnny.westerlund(a)gmail.com --- Comment #18 from johnny.westerlund(a)gmail.com 2011-02-16 04:27:04 EST --- Is there some way to sponsor this work? I am not a coder myself but i would be happy to donate $$ for this feature. I myself use a laptop and having bridge support in NetworkManager would be awsome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage February 2011