[Bug 781341] New: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781341
Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: unspecified
Component: fail2ban
AssignedTo: axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net
ReportedBy: vogel(a)folz.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: herrold(a)owlriver.com, mattdm(a)mattdm.org,
axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net, tim(a)niemueller.de,
vogel(a)folz.de, jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com,
ruben(a)rubenkerkhof.com, wdierkes(a)rackspace.com,
triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org,
voronin.andrey(a)gmail.com,
bugzilla.redhat.com(a)ewood.users.cementhorizon.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 244275
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #244275 +++
Description of problem (copied from Bug #244275):
fail2ban doesn't require shorewall to function, and in fact, as we ship it, it
makes use of the Fedora firewall - installing an extra firewall which is the
not
used in the default configuration is a bit gratuitous and confusing to the
user.
Also, the Requires: tcpwrappers isn't needed unless the user decides to enable
the tcpwrapper action (disabled by default)
Additional information:
Bug #244275 contains suggestions and possible patches for a fix, but was closed
with NOTABUG as noted in the comment from the EPEL maintainer:
--- Additional comment from maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org on 2012-01-12
22:46:49 EST ---
Since this is just the EPEL package and I don't maintain fail2ban for Fedora, I
will be keeping it in line with Fedora proper. Please feel free to discuss this
with the Fedora package maintainer.
As I wrote in some comments in Bug #244275, I'm interested in a fix for Fedora,
which is why I file this bug now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years
needinfo canceled: [Bug 584154] ps <pid> does not work if <pid> belongs to a lwp
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: procps
Jaromír Cápík <jcapik(a)redhat.com> has canceled Bug Zapper
<triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>'s request for needinfo:
Bug 584154: ps <pid> does not work if <pid> belongs to a lwp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584154
------- Additional Comments from Jaromír Cápík <jcapik(a)redhat.com>
Hello Elliott.
I just found, that this is a bit tricky. Directory listing of /proc doesn't
show LWPs, but if you try to read from /proc/<LWP>/stat, the file exists and is
readable. So, the path needs to be fully specified by hand without
autocompletion with TAB. I'll try to continue with the investigation.
Regards,
Jaromir.
10 years, 11 months
[Bug 232921] RFE: drop httpd dependency / add -httpd subpackage
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232921
Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Flags|needinfo?(limburgher@gmail. |
|com) |
Last Closed|2008-06-16 21:16:40 |2012-06-29 08:27:56
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> ---
Right you are. Fixed in rawhide.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 11 months
[Bug 232921] RFE: drop httpd dependency / add -httpd subpackage
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232921
Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |opensource(a)till.name
Flags| |needinfo?(limburgher@gmail.
| |com)
--- Comment #6 from Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> ---
The current Rawhide spec does not contain any httpd specific files, therefore
the "Requires: httpd" can afaics safely dropped there now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 11 months