triage August 2012

triage@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
150 discussions

[Bug 253630] Clash of short-cut in search dialog
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '25

04 Feb '25

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253630 lexual <lex.lists(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|lex.lists(a)gmail.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 781341] New: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jun '13

03 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781341 Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: unspecified Component: fail2ban AssignedTo: axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net ReportedBy: vogel(a)folz.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: herrold(a)owlriver.com, mattdm(a)mattdm.org, axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net, tim(a)niemueller.de, vogel(a)folz.de, jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com, ruben(a)rubenkerkhof.com, wdierkes(a)rackspace.com, triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org, voronin.andrey(a)gmail.com, bugzilla.redhat.com(a)ewood.users.cementhorizon.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Clone Of: 244275 Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #244275 +++ Description of problem (copied from Bug #244275): fail2ban doesn't require shorewall to function, and in fact, as we ship it, it makes use of the Fedora firewall - installing an extra firewall which is the not used in the default configuration is a bit gratuitous and confusing to the user. Also, the Requires: tcpwrappers isn't needed unless the user decides to enable the tcpwrapper action (disabled by default) Additional information: Bug #244275 contains suggestions and possible patches for a fix, but was closed with NOTABUG as noted in the comment from the EPEL maintainer: --- Additional comment from maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org on 2012-01-12 22:46:49 EST --- Since this is just the EPEL package and I don't maintain fail2ban for Fedora, I will be keeping it in line with Fedora proper. Please feel free to discuss this with the Fedora package maintainer. As I wrote in some comments in Bug #244275, I'm interested in a fix for Fedora, which is why I file this bug now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Aug '12

28 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #99 from Amazed <fedora(a)oeconomist.com> --- If the bug here were fixed, then we could be assured that the component were properly identified and that this bug were not the same bug as others are reporting elsewhere. Otherwise, it would seem that the report were being closed as perverse response to the the opacity of the error message. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 305431] Hald is leaking memory
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Aug '12

27 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305431 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- valgrind-3.8.0-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/valgrind-3.8.0-5.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Aug '12

26 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 Mads Kiilerich <mads(a)kiilerich.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mads(a)kiilerich.com --- Comment #98 from Mads Kiilerich <mads(a)kiilerich.com> --- This bug has nothing to do with the initrd component. The error message is a generic error message that grubby will use whenever shit happens. The message is thus a _symptom_ of some problem, but all the "me too"'s here will probably have different root causes and different solutions. 3 main places this message is seen: * When installing a new system from scratch and kernel installation can't clone any existing boot loader entry because they haven't been created yet - bug 730357 started with that. * When the system have some of /etc/grub.cfg and /etc/grub2.conf and /etc/grub2-efi.conf pointing to an invalid and unused configuration. Grubby will complain that it was fatal for _one_ of the boot loader configurations, but it doesn't matter at all as long the right boot loader is handled correctly ... and it usually is. Just uninstall the boot loaders you don't use and/or remove the unused symlinks. * When not using an initrd and grubby gets confused by inconsistencies in the system - Bug 833011. I suggest leaving this bug closed. If you see this symptom for other reasons than the one mentioned above then better file a separate bug so we don't get the different cases mixed up. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Aug '12

26 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #97 from Amazed <fedora(a)oeconomist.com> --- (In reply to comment #96) > The initial comments of this report , doesn't have nothing with grub2 , grub2 is plainly a version of grub. The bug is plainly the same bug, whatever the component is principally at issue. > So my advice is close this bug as EOL . This bug is biting with FC 17 (see comment #94) which, far from being past EoL, is the most recent "stable" release. > a follow bug #730357 Better to mark bug #730357 as a duplicate of this bug. Let's not pretend that it this is a new bug; it is over 8 years old. Wiping the slate for a bug that went so long without being worked does not seem like a good idea. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Aug '12

26 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|sergio(a)serjux.com | --- Comment #96 from Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> --- The initial comments of this report , doesn't have nothing with grub2 , which is the real problem now. So my advice is close this bug as EOL . a follow bug #730357 in meantime I'm out of this report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Aug '12

25 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #95 from Amazed <fedora(a)oeconomist.com> --- Since the bug is (finally!) assigned to someone, that person can sort-out which component is principally at issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Aug '12

25 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 Rob Riggs <rob+redhat(a)pangalactic.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rob+redhat(a)pangalactic.org --- Comment #94 from Rob Riggs <rob+redhat(a)pangalactic.org> --- I have this problem now on F17 after upgrading from F15. Platform is x86_64. Does this now belong to the dracut or grubby package? I don't think the current component is accurate anymore. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 305431] Hald is leaking memory
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Aug '12

19 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305431 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- valgrind-3.8.0-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/valgrind-3.8.0-4.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage August 2012