January 2013 - triage - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 781341] New: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781341 Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: unspecified Component: fail2ban AssignedTo: axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net ReportedBy: vogel(a)folz.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: herrold(a)owlriver.com, mattdm(a)mattdm.org, axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net, tim(a)niemueller.de, vogel(a)folz.de, jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com, ruben(a)rubenkerkhof.com, wdierkes(a)rackspace.com, triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org, voronin.andrey(a)gmail.com, bugzilla.redhat.com(a)ewood.users.cementhorizon.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Clone Of: 244275 Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #244275 +++ Description of problem (copied from Bug #244275): fail2ban doesn't require shorewall to function, and in fact, as we ship it, it makes use of the Fedora firewall - installing an extra firewall which is the not used in the default configuration is a bit gratuitous and confusing to the user. Also, the Requires: tcpwrappers isn't needed unless the user decides to enable the tcpwrapper action (disabled by default) Additional information: Bug #244275 contains suggestions and possible patches for a fix, but was closed with NOTABUG as noted in the comment from the EPEL maintainer: --- Additional comment from maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org on 2012-01-12 22:46:49 EST --- Since this is just the EPEL package and I don't maintain fail2ban for Fedora, I will be keeping it in line with Fedora proper. Please feel free to discuss this with the Fedora package maintainer. As I wrote in some comments in Bug #244275, I'm interested in a fix for Fedora, which is why I file this bug now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 years, 12 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 204448] RPM verify not functional: "file's dependencies has changed since prelinking"

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204448 Kayvan Sylvan <kayvansylvan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kayvansylvan(a)gmail.com --- Comment #27 from Kayvan Sylvan <kayvansylvan(a)gmail.com> --- I see this in F18 too. $ rpm -Va udisks prelink: /lib/udev/udisks-part-id: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?...... /lib/udev/udisks-part-id prelink: /usr/libexec/udisks-helper-create-partition: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?...... /usr/libexec/udisks-helper-create-partition prelink: /usr/libexec/udisks-helper-create-partition-table: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?...... /usr/libexec/udisks-helper-create-partition-table prelink: /usr/libexec/udisks-helper-delete-partition: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?...... /usr/libexec/udisks-helper-delete-partition prelink: /usr/libexec/udisks-helper-modify-partition: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?...... /usr/libexec/udisks-helper-modify-partition -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ncxlMCSF82&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 832853] Review Request: java3d - Java 3D

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853 --- Comment #13 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier(a)bachelot.org> --- Indeed, if Java3D goes to RPM Fusion, everything depending on it goes to RPM Fusion too. They could be moved back to Fedora once Java3D moves back to Fedora too (providing there are no other issue with them for Fedora, of course). I think it's better to have the packages in RPM Fusion rather than not having them at all, but you might have a different opinion :-) Imho, the first step on the way to try and resolve this issue is to file a bug upstream. That's why I first checked upstream bugtracker, then commented in this ticket after failing to find a corresponding bug. I'm a bit surprised this package is in Debian, as the license should probably be considered non-free for Debian too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=W7bsmvNg1c&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 832853] Review Request: java3d - Java 3D

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853 --- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it> --- hi Xavier, I understand the problem but I do not need to have a package that is used only in RPM Fusion. for me it is necessary to import http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf-java/ and its deps (http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/~billh/visad.html) regards p.s. i know the difference between fedora and debian about the problems related to licensing. but in the debian package exists ... http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-java/trunk/java3d/debian/copyright -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7vFUbeegsH&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 832853] Review Request: java3d - Java 3D

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853 --- Comment #11 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier(a)bachelot.org> --- The problem with the "nuclear facility" clause is it makes the license non-free, and thus voids the possibility to have the package in Fedora. Has anyone filled a bug upstream to try and resolve the license issue ? If yes, what the ticket number, I can't find it. Eric, Gil, would you be willing to take this package to RPM Fusion ? It can still be brought back to Fedora if the license issue is resolved someday. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=s9D9NDrQ2H&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 204446] Xclients.d files not sourced by Xclients script

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204446 Juha Tuomala <tuju(a)iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tuju(a)iki.fi --- Comment #20 from Juha Tuomala <tuju(a)iki.fi> --- This is still broken. Xclients runs Xclients.$1.sh from its .d drop dir but nothing provides that $1 argument. /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc has a line that runs Xclients but doesn't provide any argument to it and thus nothing gets executed from that dir. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rkVVN1e1q3&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 296921] Could not set DRM device bus ID. DRIScreenInit failed. Disabling DRI.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296921 Maurizio <rutadeevacuacion(a)msn.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rutadeevacuacion(a)msn.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HZ77HSTwgZ&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 230835] asus_acpi always loads

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230835 Maurizio <rutadeevacuacion(a)msn.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rutadeevacuacion(a)msn.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=klKfAw4H4P&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

needinfo canceled: [Bug 529923] Plugin should use conduit.registerPackageName()

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: yum-rhn-plugin James Antill <james.antill(a)redhat.com> has canceled Bug Zapper <triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>'s request for needinfo: Bug 529923: Plugin should use conduit.registerPackageName() https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529923

10 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 221344] gnuchess does illegal moves and segfaults

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221344 Stas Sergeev <stsp(a)list.ru> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hardware|x86_64 |All Version|16 |17 --- Comment #22 from Stas Sergeev <stsp(a)list.ru> --- What was the use keeping the completely broken update for so long? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LMpSyhnjY2&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage January 2013