[Bug 781341] New: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781341
Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: unspecified
Component: fail2ban
AssignedTo: axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net
ReportedBy: vogel(a)folz.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: herrold(a)owlriver.com, mattdm(a)mattdm.org,
axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net, tim(a)niemueller.de,
vogel(a)folz.de, jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com,
ruben(a)rubenkerkhof.com, wdierkes(a)rackspace.com,
triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org,
voronin.andrey(a)gmail.com,
bugzilla.redhat.com(a)ewood.users.cementhorizon.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 244275
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #244275 +++
Description of problem (copied from Bug #244275):
fail2ban doesn't require shorewall to function, and in fact, as we ship it, it
makes use of the Fedora firewall - installing an extra firewall which is the
not
used in the default configuration is a bit gratuitous and confusing to the
user.
Also, the Requires: tcpwrappers isn't needed unless the user decides to enable
the tcpwrapper action (disabled by default)
Additional information:
Bug #244275 contains suggestions and possible patches for a fix, but was closed
with NOTABUG as noted in the comment from the EPEL maintainer:
--- Additional comment from maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org on 2012-01-12
22:46:49 EST ---
Since this is just the EPEL package and I don't maintain fail2ban for Fedora, I
will be keeping it in line with Fedora proper. Please feel free to discuss this
with the Fedora package maintainer.
As I wrote in some comments in Bug #244275, I'm interested in a fix for Fedora,
which is why I file this bug now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8 years, 1 month
[Bug 204448] RPM verify not functional: "file's dependencies has changed since prelinking"
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204448
Kayvan Sylvan <kayvansylvan(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kayvansylvan(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #27 from Kayvan Sylvan <kayvansylvan(a)gmail.com> ---
I see this in F18 too.
$ rpm -Va udisks
prelink: /lib/udev/udisks-part-id: at least one of file's dependencies has
changed since prelinking
S.?...... /lib/udev/udisks-part-id
prelink: /usr/libexec/udisks-helper-create-partition: at least one of file's
dependencies has changed since prelinking
S.?...... /usr/libexec/udisks-helper-create-partition
prelink: /usr/libexec/udisks-helper-create-partition-table: at least one of
file's dependencies has changed since prelinking
S.?...... /usr/libexec/udisks-helper-create-partition-table
prelink: /usr/libexec/udisks-helper-delete-partition: at least one of file's
dependencies has changed since prelinking
S.?...... /usr/libexec/udisks-helper-delete-partition
prelink: /usr/libexec/udisks-helper-modify-partition: at least one of file's
dependencies has changed since prelinking
S.?...... /usr/libexec/udisks-helper-modify-partition
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ncxlMCSF82&a=cc_unsubscribe
8 years, 6 months
[Bug 832853] Review Request: java3d - Java 3D
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #13 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier(a)bachelot.org> ---
Indeed, if Java3D goes to RPM Fusion, everything depending on it goes to RPM
Fusion too. They could be moved back to Fedora once Java3D moves back to Fedora
too (providing there are no other issue with them for Fedora, of course). I
think it's better to have the packages in RPM Fusion rather than not having
them at all, but you might have a different opinion :-)
Imho, the first step on the way to try and resolve this issue is to file a bug
upstream. That's why I first checked upstream bugtracker, then commented in
this ticket after failing to find a corresponding bug.
I'm a bit surprised this package is in Debian, as the license should probably
be considered non-free for Debian too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=W7bsmvNg1c&a=cc_unsubscribe
8 years, 6 months
