[Bug 832853] Review Request: java3d - Java 3D
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Susi Lehtola <susi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |susi.lehtola(a)iki.fi
--- Comment #19 from Susi Lehtola <susi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> ---
(In reply to Harvey Harrison from comment #17)
> Updating status, I've removed the Java3d core dependency from j3dutils for
> all but one class which I'm still working one. The class in question is
> com.sun.j3d.internal.Distance which is a collection of static math functions
> ported from the 'Wild Magic' library according to the file header. Once
> this is removed, Java3d and vecmath should be OK to go into fedora.
Vecmath is already in Fedora.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FKX2BRqlUT&a=cc_unsubscribe
10 years, 5 months
[Bug 832853] Review Request: java3d - Java 3D
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #17 from Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison(a)gmail.com> ---
Updating status, I've removed the Java3d core dependency from j3dutils for all
but one class which I'm still working one. The class in question is
com.sun.j3d.internal.Distance which is a collection of static math functions
ported from the 'Wild Magic' library according to the file header. Once this
is removed, Java3d and vecmath should be OK to go into fedora.
If anyone has a look at that file and feels it is OK to move it over the Java3d
core, I'd appreciate any advice, my current plans are to remove its use
entirely from core, but it is a larger task.
Because Java3d is now a java-only project and no longer ships any native code,
I imagine the fedora packages will need pruning. How do I find the packager
for JOGL2 in Fedora-land to coordinate a suitably modern version of jogl2 for
Java3d's use? I am involved in JOGL2 upstream, but not fedora as yet.
Harvey
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4twuCBXzd4&a=cc_unsubscribe
10 years, 5 months
[Bug 781341] New: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781341
Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: unspecified
Component: fail2ban
AssignedTo: axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net
ReportedBy: vogel(a)folz.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: herrold(a)owlriver.com, mattdm(a)mattdm.org,
axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net, tim(a)niemueller.de,
vogel(a)folz.de, jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com,
ruben(a)rubenkerkhof.com, wdierkes(a)rackspace.com,
triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org,
voronin.andrey(a)gmail.com,
bugzilla.redhat.com(a)ewood.users.cementhorizon.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 244275
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #244275 +++
Description of problem (copied from Bug #244275):
fail2ban doesn't require shorewall to function, and in fact, as we ship it, it
makes use of the Fedora firewall - installing an extra firewall which is the
not
used in the default configuration is a bit gratuitous and confusing to the
user.
Also, the Requires: tcpwrappers isn't needed unless the user decides to enable
the tcpwrapper action (disabled by default)
Additional information:
Bug #244275 contains suggestions and possible patches for a fix, but was closed
with NOTABUG as noted in the comment from the EPEL maintainer:
--- Additional comment from maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org on 2012-01-12
22:46:49 EST ---
Since this is just the EPEL package and I don't maintain fail2ban for Fedora, I
will be keeping it in line with Fedora proper. Please feel free to discuss this
with the Fedora package maintainer.
As I wrote in some comments in Bug #244275, I'm interested in a fix for Fedora,
which is why I file this bug now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 6 months