[FC4]LD_LIBRARY_PATH unset by unknown application
by Leon Pu
Hi all,
I met a strange problem that system parameter LD_LIBRARY_PATH is unset
after I login Fedora core 4.
I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in .bash_profile, but it never works after I
login to Gnome or KDE. I have to manually execute .bash_profile then it
will appear.
I assume it is unset by an unknown application, but who is the unknown
application? Isn't .bash_profile the last system environment file
executed?
Best regards,
Leon
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
18 years, 8 months
Re: External Network Change
by Patrick Nelson
> Bob Chiodini Wrote:
>
>Patrick Nelson wrote:
>> FC3 (all up to date)
>>
>> This may seem simple but I'm changing ISPs and I have 2 internet facing
>> systems that also connect to the private network. One being the GW the
>> other being Mail. So I have the gateway working fine but I can not get
>> the mail server working in the changed network config. I just want to
>> make sure I'm not missing anything, because I think that the ISP is not
>> routing, switching, or configured correctly.
>>
>> -The two systems are attached to a Hub along with the connection to the
>> Internet.
>> -The gateway system is working fine with the new ISP changes (serves as
>> the DNS and GW)
>> -The mail server can be configured with the new ISP, but once I do that
>> system can not ping the internet
>> --however it can ping the internet side of the GW
>> --and the intranet.
>> -With ethereal I sniffed the mail server connection and it does appear
>> to get anthing back from the ISP GW
>>
>> Here are the changes that I make to mail server:
>>
>> 1. Use system-config-network to change the:
>> -IP Address
>> -Subnet Mask
>> -Gateway
>> 2. Change the IPTables Firewall Script to match the new config
>> 3. Turn off the firewall script for the first booting in the new
network
>> config
>> 4. Reboot
>>
>> The booting goes fine but I can not ping anything other than the GW
>> system on the Internet side.
>>
>> Is there anything that I'm missing or might try? Or does this sound
>> like a routing problem on the side of my ISP?
>>
>
>Patrick,
>
>Post the output of ifconfig and route -n from both machines. It sounds
>like the default gateway on the mail server is incorrect.
>
>Bob...
Sorry for the delay I was out on a site.
Here it is:
------------
- ifconfig -
------------
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:60:B0:C3:D4:C1
inet addr:206.58.200.39 Bcast:206.58.201.255 Mask:255.255.254.0
inet6 addr: fe80::260:b0ff:fec3:d4c1/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1136 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:492 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:195090 (190.5 KiB) TX bytes:37578 (36.6 KiB)
Interrupt:9 Base address:0xece0
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:03:5D:07:C1:32
inet addr:10.1.1.1 Bcast:10.1.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1310 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1310 errors:3 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:655425 (640.0 KiB) TX bytes:221435 (216.2 KiB)
Interrupt:9 Base address:0x100
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:440 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:440 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:61126 (59.6 KiB) TX bytes:61126 (59.6 KiB)
------------
- route -n -
------------
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
206.58.200.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.254.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0
0 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
0.0.0.0 206.58.200.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
Does anything here show a problem on my side rather than the ISP? Thanks!
18 years, 8 months
rpm not working on fedora core 3 using fresh install
by Medrano-Zaldivar, L E
Gang,
I running this line as root " rpm http://apt.kspei.com fedora/3/i386 kspei", any idea why I have this results:
RPM version 4.3.2
Copyright (C) 1998-2002 - Red Hat, Inc.
This program may be freely redistributed under the terms of the GNU GPL
Usage: rpm [-aKfgpqV] [-aKfgpqVcdils] [-aKfgpqVcdilsaKfgpqV] [-aKfgpqVcdilsaKfgpqV] [-aKfgpqVcdilsaKfgpqVK] [-aKfgpqVcdilsaKfgpqVK] [-aKfgpqVcdilsaKfgpqVKi] [-aKfgpqVcdilsaKfgpqVKiv] [-aKfgpqVcdilsaKfgpqVKiv] [-aKfgpqVcdilsaKfgpqVKiv?] [-a|--all] [-f|--file] [-g|--group]
[-p|--package] [--specfile] [--whatrequires] [--whatprovides]
[-c|--configfiles] [-d|--docfiles] [--dump] [-l|--list]
[--queryformat=QUERYFORMAT] [-s|--state] [--nomd5] [--nofiles]
[--nodeps] [--noscript] [--addsign] [-K|--checksig] [--import]
[--resign] [--nodigest] [--nosignature] [--initdb] [--rebuilddb]
[--aid] [--allfiles] [--allmatches] [--badreloc]
[-e|--erase <package>+] [--excludedocs] [--excludepath=<path>]
[--fileconflicts] [--force] [-F|--freshen <packagefile>+] [-h|--hash]
[--ignorearch] [--ignoreos] [--ignoresize] [-i|--install] [--justdb]
[--nodeps] [--nomd5] [--nocontexts] [--noorder] [--nosuggest]
[--noscripts] [--notriggers] [--oldpackage] [--percent]
[--prefix=<dir>] [--relocate=<old>=<new>] [--repackage]
[--replacefiles] [--replacepkgs] [--test]
[-U|--upgrade <packagefile>+] [-D|--define 'MACRO EXPR']
[-E|--eval 'EXPR'] [--macros=<FILE:...>] [--nodigest] [--nosignature]
[--rcfile=<FILE:...>] [-r|--root ROOT] [--querytags] [--showrc]
[--quiet] [-v|--verbose] [--version] [-?|--help] [--usage]
[--scripts] [--setperms] [--setugids] [--conflicts] [--obsoletes]
[--provides] [--requires] [--info] [--changelog] [--triggers]
[--last] [--filesbypkg] [--fileclass] [--filecolor] [--filecontext]
[--fscontext] [--recontext] [--fileprovide] [--filerequire]
[--redhatprovides] [--redhatrequires] [--buildpolicy=<policy>]
[--with=<option>] [--without=<option>]
18 years, 8 months
rewriting http --> https not working
by Matt Morgan
I thought I understood how to use apache's rewriting rules to force
certain pages to https, but it's not working. I've compared my .conf
file to others online, and it looks right to me.
This is my /etc/httpd/conf.d/force-ssl.conf file:
-------
# Rewrite Rules.
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} !=on
RewriteRule ^/webmail/(.*) https://%{SERVER_NAME}/webmail/$1 [R,L]
RewriteRule ^/mailman/(.*) https://%{SERVER_NAME}/mailman/$1 [R,L]
#Debug rewrite rules
RewriteLog /etc/httpd/logs/rewrite_engine_log
RewriteLogLevel 3
-------
The idea is to take any URL under /webmail or /mailman and redirect it
to https, so that, for example,
http://www.concretecomputing.com/webmail/
gets redirected to the same page, but using https. It doesn't happen.
SSL is working; if I type in the https it works fine. But no
redirection is happening. I have restarted Apache uneventfully. What
did I do wrong?
Thanks,
Matt
18 years, 8 months
HP Color Laserjet 2600N; printer recommendation
by Matt Morgan
I have an HP Color Laserjet 2600N. In a lot of ways it's a great
printer--color, laser, cheap (~$400US), built-in networking. But, as
far as I can tell, it's not at all linux-compatible (unlike other
HP's).
If I try to print directly to it from FC3, I can't. Even when I try to
set up a local Windows computer as a server, the job gets sent to the
printer, but they just die. The printer doesn't even act like it
received anything--no errors, etc. I'm using a driver for the 2550
version of that printer (same results for both PS and HPIJS drivers),
since I can't find anything specifically for the 2600. Usually that
trick works with HP printers.
Any ideas how I can get it working? If not, can anyone recommend a
printer that is:
Color laser
cheap
networked
linux-compatible
outside of that, quality and reliability are more important than speed.
Thanks,
Matt
18 years, 8 months
RE: Our (US) $s at work.
by Callahan, Michael
Point taken; I intended to keep out of it, but I found it impossible to be
silent on that last remark. You're right, this has gotten way off topic.
This thread should end.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Malone [mailto:ibm21@cam.ac.uk]
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 9:40 PM
To: fedora-list(a)redhat.com
Subject: Our (US) $s at work.
Callahan, Michael wrote:
>
>
> Let's say that those whom you "understand" got their own country (or
> countries) and had achieved all of their political and social aims.
> What would that world be like? I would like to understand your
> understanding of these people.
>
> If you had to live there or in America, what would be your choice, and
why?
>
>
And, more importantly for our purposes, what would be their needs wrt FC5?
(and is any one else finding this tedious?)
--
imalone
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
********** Confidentiality Notice **********
This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other
writings are confidential and are for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) identified above. This message may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure
under applicable law. If the receiver of this information is not the
intended recipient, or the employee, or agent responsible for delivering
the information to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any use, reading, dissemination, distribution, copying or storage of this
information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in
error, please notify the sender by return email and delete the electronic
transmission, including all attachments from your system.
18 years, 8 months
"sync" option in fstab for USB memory stick
by John Wendel
Wrote a 26 MB file (using cp) to my Sandisk minicruiser (USB 2.0) memory
stick, it took 17 minutes! Seemed to be a LITTLE SLOW :), so I started
looking for the reason and found it in the fstab entry, it was the
"sync" option.
When I mounted the stick without the sync option the cp + a single sync
to flush the data to the device took 10 seconds.
Can someone tell me how to change the automagically generated fstab entry?
Thanks,
John
18 years, 8 months
Re: Our (US) $s at work.
by David G. Miller (aka DaveAtFraud)
mrsam(a)courier-mta.com wrote:
> Two years from now, folks running older versions of RH or FC for which
> no glibc update was issued will have their clocks stop showing correct
> time for most of the year.
>
> That's because Washington has screwed around with Daylight Savings
> Time, again. They don't have anything better to do inside the Beltway,
> apparently.
>
> I always thought that daylight time was a joke. It's totally stupid,
> and has no redeeming qualities whatsoever. I am aware of the official
> excuse for daylight time, but I still think it's stupid, it's dumb,
> and idiotic. If anyone is really serious about saving energy, they
> should simply change the timezone permanently.
>
> Starting in 2007, the so-called "standard time" will actually be in
> effect for less than half a year. Standard time won't really be the
> standard most of the time. Isn't it amazing? The US is now the
> laughing stock of the entire world. You can almost see everyone point
> their fingers across the Atlantic: “Those dumb yanks, they can't even
> make up their mind what time of day it is, most of the time!”
>
As a non-morning person, I've always said, "The early worm deserves the
bird." Daylight savings time is like trying to make a blanket longer by
cutting a foot of material off the bottom of the blanket and sewing it
onto the top. The blanket is only as long as it is and there are still
only 24 hours in an Earth day; if you want a longer "day", move to Mars.
Whenever someone tries to convince me of Benjamin Franklin's genius, I
just mention daylight savings time.
Cheers,
Dave
18 years, 8 months
supported 802.11g pcmcia card + WPA support
by Peter Magnusson
Hi there.
I have looked a looong time for a 802.11g pcmcia (pc-card) card with WPA
support that is supported in linux, more exact in FC4. I havent been able
to find any, maybe I could get some advices which card I should buy here?
18 years, 8 months
VNC problem
by John Aldrich
I made the mistake of leaving a full-screen VNC session going from my wife's
Windows ME box to my linux box. She couldn't figure out how to get back to
Windows, so she rebooted her box. Now, my system thinks that there's a :1
session going somewhere, but I can't seem to find the lock or the PID file.
I've looked in my ~/.vnc folder, renamed the .vnc folder to .vnc-old and made
a new .vnc folder, and copied the relevant files over, rebooted my box (I
needed to anyway, to use the new kernel I installed via up2date awhile back)
and still, every time I try to start a new VNC session, I get it starting
on :2.
Any ideas on how to get the new session started on :1 again? There are no vnc
server sessions currently running, I checked. I *did* have a stale .pid file,
only visible by root, but it's gone now.
HELP! I'd really like to get my :1 session back, since that's the session I
tunnel to from my Win2k box at work. :-)
Thanks
John
18 years, 8 months
