RE: evince
by Patrick Dupre
>
> What are you. Asking.. I am not getting
Should I set up something to have the correct viewing?
I cannot use it with "wrong" character while I think that
evince would be helpfull for some purpose.
In one word I would like to use evince, but because the
displaying is wrong, I just cannot use it!
However, I may have not configured it properly!
I was even thinking that there may be an issue with
postscript level 2 and level 3!
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: "Patrick Dupre" <pdupre(a)gmx.com>
>
> Sent: 27-11-2013 08:48 PM
>
> To: "fedora" <users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
>
> Subject: evince
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
>
> but is wrong with evince.
>
> The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong character for me
>
> is \Phi.
>
>
>
> Would you know what is wrong?
>
>
>
> Thank.
>
>
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
>
> Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
>
> Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
>
> Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
>
> 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
>
> ===========================================================================
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
10 years, 4 months
Re: A Question About Orca After Installation
by poma
On 27.11.2013 16:58, Hunter Jozwiak wrote:
> Hello folks, I've gotten Fedora 19, and I love what I've
> experienced thus far. I have two important questions about
> post-installation: will Orca start up after I reboot the system,
> and does Fedora 19 use Gnome 3.10?
Bummer, doesn't work with the Birdie.
Runnin within the Xfce.
poma
10 years, 4 months
RE: evince
by mulkesh sharma
What are you. Asking.. I am not getting
-----Original Message-----
From: "Patrick Dupre" <pdupre(a)gmx.com>
Sent: 27-11-2013 08:48 PM
To: "fedora" <users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Subject: evince
Hello,
The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
but is wrong with evince.
The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong character for me
is \Phi.
Would you know what is wrong?
Thank.
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
10 years, 4 months
F18: Adobe Acrobat Reader fails hyperlinks?
by Dan Thurman
It appears that on Fedora 18, Adobe Acrobat Reader
hyperlinks (control-left-click on link) fails to execute
properly and bring up the the web page.
I tried the same PDF file on F13 and it works.
Is it a bug or is there something I need to do
to make this work?
10 years, 4 months
Display setting problem CORRECTION-
by Bob Goodwin
CORRECTION: Fedora-19
I have a ViewSonic VX2035wm LCD Display monitor on this computer that is
not recognized by Fedora-19. in order to get a reasonable display I have
to run /usr/bin/xrandr -s 1680x1050 after I am logged in and the display
[XFCE] is running. That works for me but it seems a bit clunky and after
doing so for more than a year I would like to find some more elegant way
to deal with it.
I could use a different monitor but I prefer the aspect ratio of this
one, it's wide but higher than the others available.
Anyone know a better way to deal with this? As it stands it is just one
of the things I do every morning after booting the computer ...
Bob
--
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
Box 10 Fedora-19/64 XFCE Linux
10 years, 4 months
How avoid unwanted systemd-journald?
by Franta Hanzlík
For one thing I'm in the conviction that binary logs are hazardous
bullshit, for another on my two F19 machines systemd-journald occupy
significant part of resources (after several days it is often 1.5 to
2.5 GB RAM and several GB on /var/log/journal/*/* filesystem).
Then, how I can avoid this crap and log only to standard rsyslogd?
I tried set "LogTarget=syslog-or-kmsg" in "[Manager]" section of
/etc/systemd/{system.conf,user.conf}, but this not helped; setting
"Storage=none" in "[Journal]" section of /etc/systemd/journald.conf
is better, but I want ideally completely cut out systemd-journald
from my systems.
TIA, Franta Hanzlik
10 years, 4 months
Writing English.
by Rolf Turner
Just read some stuff on this list about "spins", a concept which had
not previously impinged itself upon my consciousness. So I went and
had a look at the spins.fedoraproject.org page. It started off by saying
"What is a spin? Fedora spins are alternate version of Fedora, tailored
...".
For God's sake, people!!! That's "alternative versions"!!! Alternate
means "every other" or "every second". Alternative means "available as
another possibility". Saying "alternate" when you mean "alternative" is
sloppy, lazy thinking and irritates and confuses the reader.
Why can't computer geeks learn to write English correctly?
Of course the geeks are not alone in their inability. I just read, in
this morning's New Zealand Herald, an article (reprinted from the
Independent,
which you would think would get it right!) about Pope Francis, in which
it was said "Despite winning pundits for his graceful-but-radical
abdication,
Benedict fell victim to ...". Uh, I think the writer meant *plaudits*,
don't you?
Psigh! What hope for humanity? :-)
cheers,
Rolf Turner
10 years, 4 months
Kernel update causes wireless to disable
by Don Levey
My wife's laptop was running fine on kernel 3.10.11-200:
uname -a:
Linux croweflies.the-leveys.us 3.10.11-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Sep 9
13:03:01 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
lspci -s 03:00.0:
03:00.0 Network controller: Ralink corp. RT5390 Wireless 802.11n 1T/1R PCIe
rfkill list wlan:
1: phy0: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
I neither had nor needed any additional kernel modules. However, when I
upgraded kernels:
uname -a:
Linux croweflies.the-leveys.us 3.11.2-201.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Sep 27
19:20:55 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
lspci -s 03:00.0:
03:00.0 Network controller: Ralink corp. RT5390 Wireless 802.11n 1T/1R PCIe
rfkill list wlan:
0: asus-wlan: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
1: phy0: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: yes
Now I've got "asus-wlan" while my original one is listed as "hard
blocked." The problem is that the "asus-wlan" doesn's show as an
available interface, and I cannot connect. Any suggestions?
-Don
10 years, 4 months
update FC19
by Patrick Dupre
Hello,
TRying to update fedora 19, I get:
--> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/nxssh for package: qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686
--> Running transaction check
---> Package nx.i686 0:3.5.0-17.fc19 will be obsoleted
---> Package nx-libs.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 will be obsoleting
--> Processing Dependency: nx-libs(x86-32) = 3.5.0.21-3.fc19 for package: libNX_Xfixes-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686
--> Processing Dependency: nx-libs(x86-32) = 3.5.0.21-3.fc19 for package: libNX_X11-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686
--> Processing Dependency: nx-libs(x86-32) = 3.5.0.21-3.fc19 for package: libNX_Xdamage-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686
--> Processing Dependency: nx-libs(x86-32) = 3.5.0.21-3.fc19 for package: libNX_Xtst-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686
--> Processing Dependency: nx-libs(x86-32) = 3.5.0.21-3.fc19 for package: libXcomp-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686
--> Processing Dependency: nx-libs(x86-32) = 3.5.0.21-3.fc19 for package: libNX_Xpm-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686
--> Processing Dependency: nx-libs(x86-32) = 3.5.0.21-3.fc19 for package: libNX_Xinerama-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686
--> Processing Dependency: nx-libs(x86-32) = 3.5.0.21-3.fc19 for package: libXcompshad-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686
--> Processing Dependency: nx-libs(x86-32) = 3.5.0.21-3.fc19 for package: libNX_Xrandr-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686
--> Processing Dependency: nx-libs(x86-32) = 3.5.0.21-3.fc19 for package: libXcompext-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686
--> Processing Dependency: nx-libs(x86-32) = 3.5.0.21-3.fc19 for package: libNX_Xrender-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686
--> Processing Dependency: nx-libs(x86-32) = 3.5.0.21-3.fc19 for package: libNX_Xcomposite-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686
--> Processing Dependency: nx-libs(x86-32) = 3.5.0.21-3.fc19 for package: libNX_Xext-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686
--> Processing Dependency: nx-libs(x86-32) = 3.5.0.21-3.fc19 for package: libNX_Xdmcp-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686
Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
libNX_X11-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 from updates
libNX_Xcomposite-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 from updates
libNX_Xdamage-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 from updates
libNX_Xdmcp-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 from updates
libNX_Xext-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 from updates
libNX_Xfixes-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 from updates
libNX_Xinerama-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 from updates
libNX_Xpm-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 from updates
libNX_Xrandr-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 from updates
libNX_Xrender-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 from updates
libNX_Xtst-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 from updates
libXcomp-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 from updates
libXcompext-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 from updates
libXcompshad-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 from updates
nx-libs-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 from updates
nxagent-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 from updates
nxproxy-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 from updates
How can I fix this issue?
Thank
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
10 years, 4 months
Re: Why some say "rpm hell"
by AP
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Tim <ignored_mailbox(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Are you running some extra privacy options in your browser or gmail?
> Are you actually using the "reply" function, or are you mistakenly
> forwarding?
I am using extra privacy options in the Firefox but not in Opera.
Sometimes I use Opera also and other times Firefox. In Firefox, I am
using the addons like NoScript, AdBlock Plus and Better Privacy. Yes,
on the bottom of each mail I click "reply" to reply to an email but
not the option of "forwarding".
Thanks.
10 years, 4 months
