users December 2013

users@lists.fedoraproject.org

197 participants
291 discussions

Re: evince
by Patrick Dupre 04 Dec '13

04 Dec '13

> > > > In looking at the document's properties and selecting the "fonts" tab I noticed that it was using /usr/share/fonts/google-croscore/SymbolNeu.ttf for symbols on my F19 system. This comes with the google-croscore-symbolneu-fonts package. Erasing this package resulted in a "delta" being displayed as /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/s050000l.pfb is now being used. In my case, I use for symbol: /usr/sahre/fonts/wine-symbol-fonts/symbol.ttf In my opinion, this is the faultry font. I dug a bit, In the symbol font, the Delta character is U+0394, while the increment character is U+2206 (looks very simiar to a Delta), and it is just beside the empty set character U+2205, the one which is probably displayed (like a Phi). So, there is a mess up here. > > > > > > FWIW, the same issue exists in the current F20 Beta. I'll be filling a bugzilla on this..... > > -- > Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts > -- > users mailing list > users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org =========================================================================== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France ===========================================================================

4 6

evince
by Patrick Dupre 03 Dec '13

03 Dec '13

Hello, The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread, but is wrong with evince. The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong character for me is \Phi. Would you know what is wrong? Thank. =========================================================================== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France ===========================================================================

10 18

Re: nx
by Patrick Dupre 03 Dec '13

03 Dec '13

Hello Mike, Thank for the clarifications. However, in my opinion there is still something missing. nb-libs is suppsed to provide nx, however, this is the list of provided files: /etc/ld.so.conf.d/nx-libs-i386.conf /usr/lib/nx /usr/share/doc/nx-libs-3.5.0.21 /usr/share/doc/nx-libs-3.5.0.21/COPYING /usr/share/doc/nx-libs-3.5.0.21/LICENSE /usr/share/doc/nx-libs-3.5.0.21/README /usr/share/nx/SecurityPolicy I cannot see in this list a nx, nxssh or a nxclient executable file, ie. /usr/bin/nx! Maybe nxagent would do it, but I am not sure. Regards. > > On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:42:38 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > Thank for your feedback. > > > > I do not know what else do you need, anyway I attach a full file > > Thanks! > > The output is based on --skip-broken, so it's harder to read, but: > > --> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/nxssh for package: qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686 > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package nx.i686 0:3.5.0-17.fc19 will be obsoleted > ---> Package nx-libs.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 will be obsoleting > > The new "nx-libs" package replaces "nx", which includes /usr/bin/nxssh as > needed by "qtnx". > > "qtnx" is a subpackage built from the "freenx-client" src.rpm package: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6080 > > It still exists in F19, but it has been orphaned in F20: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/freenx-client > > > It was Bug 1036426 > > Wrong component "yum". This is a bug in "nx", respectively the new "nx-libs". > I've pointed at > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1034046 > before. =========================================================================== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France ===========================================================================

2 1

Can't stand Gnome3, I think it's time for Fedora to move on
by Hugh Caley 03 Dec '13

03 Dec '13

I'm voting for Cinnamon, since the developer of compiz isn't interested in keeping it going. But maybe if MATE was the default for Fedora he'd change his mind? Or someone else would take over? Hugh -- *Hugh Caley Software Developer, Rocket Aldon Rocket Software* 6001 Shellmound St. Ste. 600 · Emeryville, CA 94608 · USA · Tel:+1.510.285.8542 Email:hcaley@rocketsoftware.com Web:http://aldon.rocketsoftware.com

19 43

nemo: how to change font for terminal in nemo?
by lee 03 Dec '13

03 Dec '13

Hi, does anyone know how I can change the font used be the terminal that's built into nemo? Nemo uses vte for the terminal. -- Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat)

1 0

Re: nx
by Patrick Dupre 03 Dec '13

03 Dec '13

Thank for your feedback. I do not know what else do you need, anyway I attach a full file In addition, yum wants to update: nx-libs-3.5.0.21-3.fc19 nxagent-3.5.0.21-3.fc19 nxproxy-3.5.0.21-3.fc19 and it failed to process request: qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686 requires /usr/bin/nxssh : Success - empty transaction It was Bug 1036426 Thank again. > Subject: Re: nx > > On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:14:43 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I do not understand why I get a dependencies issue with nx: > > Skipped (dependency problems): > > libNX_X11.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xcomposite.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > libNX_Xdamage.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xdmcp.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > libNX_Xext.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xfixes.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > libNX_Xinerama.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xpm.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > libNX_Xrandr.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xrender.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > libNX_Xtst.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libXcomp.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > libXcompext.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libXcompshad.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > nx-libs.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 nxagent.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > nxproxy.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > > > > > This is what is installed: > > nx-3.5.0-17.fc19.i686 > > qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686 > > freenx-server-0.7.3-31.fc19.i686 > > freenx-client-0.9-16.fc19.i686 > > nxclient-3.5.0-7.i386 > > nxcl-0.9-16.fc19.i686 > > > > > > What is wrong? > > > > On a fedora 18, I have: > > freenx-server-0.7.3-30.fc18.x86_64 > > nxclient-3.5.0-7.x86_64 > > nx-3.5.0-12.fc18.x86_64 > > nxcl-0.9-15.fc18.x86_64 > > freenx-client-0.9-15.fc18.x86_64 > > nxnode-3.5.0-9.x86_64 > > nxserver-3.5.0-11.x86_64 > > qtnx-0.9-15.fc18.x86_64 > > > > And every thing is OK! > > I've replied to your mail "yum update" yesterday. Why did you create > a new thread? And once again you've truncated Yum output too much. > > > I submitted the issue at bugzilla, but it not been considered as a bug!!!! > > Which ticket number? =========================================================================== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France ===========================================================================

4 3

nx
by Patrick Dupre 03 Dec '13

03 Dec '13

Hello, I do not understand why I get a dependencies issue with nx: Skipped (dependency problems): libNX_X11.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xcomposite.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xdamage.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xdmcp.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xext.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xfixes.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xinerama.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xpm.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xrandr.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xrender.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xtst.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libXcomp.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libXcompext.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libXcompshad.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 nx-libs.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 nxagent.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 nxproxy.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 This is what is installed: nx-3.5.0-17.fc19.i686 qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686 freenx-server-0.7.3-31.fc19.i686 freenx-client-0.9-16.fc19.i686 nxclient-3.5.0-7.i386 nxcl-0.9-16.fc19.i686 What is wrong? On a fedora 18, I have: freenx-server-0.7.3-30.fc18.x86_64 nxclient-3.5.0-7.x86_64 nx-3.5.0-12.fc18.x86_64 nxcl-0.9-15.fc18.x86_64 freenx-client-0.9-15.fc18.x86_64 nxnode-3.5.0-9.x86_64 nxserver-3.5.0-11.x86_64 qtnx-0.9-15.fc18.x86_64 And every thing is OK! I submitted the issue at bugzilla, but it not been considered as a bug!!!! Thank for your help =========================================================================== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France ===========================================================================

3 2

Writing to an USB stick on Fedora 19
by Florian Weimer 02 Dec '13

02 Dec '13

What's the correct way to write an image to a USB stick? I don't write to it while any file systems are mounted. Mounting happens automatically when I plug in the stick, and if I click "Eject" in the GNOME notification, the /dev/sdb block device assigned to the stick is still present, but dead—the open system call fails with ENOMEDIUM. I've got a fairly default Fedora 19 installation, running GNOME in Classic Mode, still running the 3.11.6-201.fc19.x86_64 kernel. (Right now, I overwrite the start of the stick with zeros while the system is mounted, sync, unplug, and the plug it in again, for the actual write operation, but that can't be the right thing to do.) -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team

6 5

Re: nx
by Patrick Dupre 02 Dec '13

02 Dec '13

Did I make some progesses? I removed nx, freenx-client and qtnx, to be able to install nxagent, nx-libs, nxproxy but then I lost nx. I cannot reinstall nx: Package nx-3.5.0-17.fc19.i686 is obsoleted by nx-libs-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 which is already installed Nothing to do But nx-libs does not provide a nx executable I cannot install freenx-client either: Packages skipped because of dependency problems: freenx-client-0.9-16.fc19.i686 from fedora qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686 from fedora In my opinion, it is a real bug!! > Subject: Re: nx > > Thank for your feedback. > > I do not know what else do you need, anyway I attach a full file > > In addition, yum wants to update: > nx-libs-3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > nxagent-3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > nxproxy-3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > and it failed to process request: > qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686 requires /usr/bin/nxssh : Success - empty transaction > > It was Bug 1036426 > > Thank again. > > > Subject: Re: nx > > > > On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:14:43 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I do not understand why I get a dependencies issue with nx: > > > Skipped (dependency problems): > > > libNX_X11.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xcomposite.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > > libNX_Xdamage.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xdmcp.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > > libNX_Xext.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xfixes.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > > libNX_Xinerama.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xpm.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > > libNX_Xrandr.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xrender.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > > libNX_Xtst.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libXcomp.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > > libXcompext.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libXcompshad.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > > nx-libs.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 nxagent.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > > nxproxy.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 > > > > > > > > > This is what is installed: > > > nx-3.5.0-17.fc19.i686 > > > qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686 > > > freenx-server-0.7.3-31.fc19.i686 > > > freenx-client-0.9-16.fc19.i686 > > > nxclient-3.5.0-7.i386 > > > nxcl-0.9-16.fc19.i686 > > > > > > > > > What is wrong? > > > > > > On a fedora 18, I have: > > > freenx-server-0.7.3-30.fc18.x86_64 > > > nxclient-3.5.0-7.x86_64 > > > nx-3.5.0-12.fc18.x86_64 > > > nxcl-0.9-15.fc18.x86_64 > > > freenx-client-0.9-15.fc18.x86_64 > > > nxnode-3.5.0-9.x86_64 > > > nxserver-3.5.0-11.x86_64 > > > qtnx-0.9-15.fc18.x86_64 > > > > > > And every thing is OK! > > > > I've replied to your mail "yum update" yesterday. Why did you create > > a new thread? And once again you've truncated Yum output too much. > > > > > I submitted the issue at bugzilla, but it not been considered as a bug!!!! > > > > Which ticket number? > > > =========================================================================== > Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com > Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | > Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | > Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 > 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France > =========================================================================== =========================================================================== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France ===========================================================================

1 0

RE: evince
by Edward M 02 Dec '13

02 Dec '13

>From my understanding, the thread breaking that has been occurring has been caused by using webmail based. I don't understand why webmail companies Would remove those headers. Since iam emailing from windows phone, this may break the thread. Sorry, if it does. Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: Garry T. Williams<mailto:gtwilliams@gmail.com> Sent: ‎12/‎1/‎2013 4:56 PM To: Community support for Fedora users<mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: Re: evince On 12-1-13 19:31:47 David wrote: > So you are telling me that all of this time, while I have been > dodging flack because mine works and theirs does not, that 'mine' > works and theirs' does not? Really? Really? > > Please tell them. :-) Actually, this is quite simple. An E-mail message that includes the proper headers preserves the thread or conversation. One that does not doesn't. -- Garry T. Williams -- users mailing list users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

2 2

Jump to page: