users May 2018

users@lists.fedoraproject.org

133 participants
158 discussions

gawk
by Patrick Dupre 17 May '18

17 May '18

Hello How can I print a "#" with gawk? Thank =========================================================================== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France ===========================================================================

7 9

Compile issues after F27 -> F28 upgrade
by alan＠clueserver.org 16 May '18

16 May '18

I did an upgrade from Fedora 27 to the Fedora 28 beta a while back. (About a week before final release.) After the update I tried to recompile a program I use often. The program would compile after a bit of patching, but it would not start. Using ldd I was able to determine that the ldconfig database still had old entries from the Fedora 27 install that had been upgraded/erased. Is this a known issue or am I just going mad? perl -pe 's/^\s+//g' *.py

2 1

Dialog box pops up now when double clicking on desktop icons in LXDE, asking for confirmation. Want to stop this behavior.
by stan 16 May '18

16 May '18

Hi, The subject pretty much says it. In the last week or so, the behavior of the icons on the desktop has changed to require confirmation before opening the application in LXDE. There is one icon, the one for spectacle, the screen capture application, that this does not happen for. So there must be a way to stop it from happening. Would this be an issue in X (LXDE still runs only on X as far as I am aware), LXDE, or maybe selinux or some other security app? There have been hundreds of updates in that time frame, so unless I absolutely have to, I'd rather not go back looking through them for a likely culprit. Thanks for any help.

2 6

Dfault video player -
by Bob Goodwin 16 May '18

16 May '18

/I have a bunch of iPhone videos to view. I have spent the last hour googling without success: How to make the default video player "VLC" and remove the "Videos" item offered whenever I go to view one. I haven't even been able to determine what application "Videos" starts, but it never does anything but put a spinner on the screen. I don't want to fix it, I just want it to go away and be replaced with VLC which always works. Any help appreciated, Bob. / -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-27/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3

3 5

WTF is this nonsense from bash -x ?
by Tom Horsley 15 May '18

15 May '18

I'll often run a little file full of shell commands and want to see the command followed by the output so I'll run it like so: bash -x ./files.txt > symbols.txt Before fedora 28, that would result in symbols.txt showing the commands in files.txt with a '+' in front of them followed by the output from the command. In fedora 28, I'm now getting 93 lines of absolute gibberish showing up before the first command which looks like this nonsense: + unset _mlre _mlIFS _mlshdbg + '[' 0 = 1 ']' + export MODULES_RUN_QUARANTINE=LD_LIBRARY_PATH + MODULES_RUN_QUARANTINE=LD_LIBRARY_PATH ... + PATH=/usr/share/Modules/bin:.:/userland/tom/scripts:/userland/tom/profile/progs/bin/amd64-lx:/userland/tom/profile/progs/bin/i86-lx:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local + export PATH ++ manpath + manpath=/usr/share/man:/usr/local/man:/usr/local/share/man:/usr/man + [[ ! :/usr/share/man:/usr/local/man:/usr/local/share/man:/usr/man: =~ :/usr/share/man: ]] + '[' -n '' ']' What the heck is this nonsense?

4 7

dnf system-upgrade reboot stalled after reboot (KDE F26->F27)
by Frédéric 15 May '18

15 May '18

I followed the instruction from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade to upgrade a system from F26 to F27. Everything seemed to work correctly (all packages installed and checked), then the system rebooted on F27. I saw the fedora icon now surrounded by a white square. But it is now stalled with only this on the screen: [ 6.196960] tpm tpm0: tpm_try_transmit: tpm_send: error -62. Apparently, I can access the system with ssh. Looking at the journal, I see a lot of red (many more such lines in the log): May 15 14:14:50 beta sddm-helper[4245]: PAM adding faulty module: /usr/lib64/security/pam_elogind.so May 15 14:14:50 beta audit[4245]: USER_ACCT pid=4245 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:xdm_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 msg='op=PAM:accounting grantors=pam_permit acct="sddm" exe="/usr/libe May 15 14:14:50 beta audit[4245]: USER_AUTH pid=4245 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:xdm_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 msg='op=PAM:authentication grantors=pam_permit acct="sddm" exe="/usr/ May 15 14:14:50 beta sddm-helper[4245]: PAM unable to dlopen(/usr/lib64/security/pam_elogind.so): /usr/lib64/security/pam_elogind.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory May 15 14:14:50 beta sddm[1233]: QProcess: Destroyed while process ("/usr/libexec/sddm-helper") is still running. May 15 14:14:49 beta sddm-helper[4240]: PAM adding faulty module: /usr/lib64/security/pam_elogind.so May 15 14:14:49 beta audit[4240]: USER_ACCT pid=4240 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:xdm_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 msg='op=PAM:accounting grantors=pam_permit acct="sddm" exe="/usr/libe May 15 14:14:49 beta audit[4240]: USER_AUTH pid=4240 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:xdm_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 msg='op=PAM:authentication grantors=pam_permit acct="sddm" exe="/usr/ May 15 14:14:49 beta sddm-helper[4240]: PAM unable to dlopen(/usr/lib64/security/pam_elogind.so): /usr/lib64/security/pam_elogind.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory May 15 14:14:49 beta sddm[1233]: QProcess: Destroyed while process ("/usr/libexec/sddm-helper") is still running. May 15 14:14:49 beta sddm-helper[4235]: PAM adding faulty module: /usr/lib64/security/pam_elogind.so May 15 14:14:49 beta audit[4235]: USER_ACCT pid=4235 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:xdm_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 msg='op=PAM:accounting grantors=pam_permit acct="sddm" exe="/usr/libe May 15 14:14:49 beta audit[4235]: USER_AUTH pid=4235 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:xdm_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 msg='op=PAM:authentication grantors=pam_permit acct="sddm" exe="/usr/ May 15 14:14:49 beta sddm-helper[4235]: PAM unable to dlopen(/usr/lib64/security/pam_elogind.so): /usr/lib64/security/pam_elogind.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory May 15 14:14:49 beta sddm[1233]: QProcess: Destroyed while process ("/usr/libexec/sddm-helper") is still running. May 15 14:14:49 beta sddm-helper[4230]: PAM adding faulty module: /usr/lib64/security/pam_elogind.so May 15 14:14:49 beta audit[4230]: USER_ACCT pid=4230 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:xdm_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 msg='op=PAM:accounting grantors=pam_permit acct="sddm" exe="/usr/libe May 15 14:14:49 beta audit[4230]: USER_AUTH pid=4230 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:xdm_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 msg='op=PAM:authentication grantors=pam_permit acct="sddm" exe="/usr/ May 15 14:14:49 beta sddm-helper[4230]: PAM unable to dlopen(/usr/lib64/security/pam_elogind.so): /usr/lib64/security/pam_elogind.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory May 15 14:14:49 beta sddm[1233]: QProcess: Destroyed while process ("/usr/libexec/sddm-helper") is still running. May 15 14:14:49 beta sddm-helper[4225]: PAM adding faulty module: /usr/lib64/security/pam_elogind.so May 15 14:14:49 beta audit[4225]: USER_ACCT pid=4225 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:xdm_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 msg='op=PAM:accounting grantors=pam_permit acct="sddm" exe="/usr/libe May 15 14:14:49 beta audit[4225]: USER_AUTH pid=4225 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:xdm_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 msg='op=PAM:authentication grantors=pam_permit acct="sddm" exe="/usr/ May 15 14:14:49 beta sddm-helper[4225]: PAM unable to dlopen(/usr/lib64/security/pam_elogind.so): /usr/lib64/security/pam_elogind.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory May 15 14:14:49 beta sddm[1233]: QProcess: Destroyed while process ("/usr/libexec/sddm-helper") is still running. May 15 14:14:49 beta sddm-helper[4220]: PAM adding faulty module: /usr/lib64/security/pam_elogind.so Thanks, F

2 4

How to repair a Fedora28 file system ?
by Ger van Dijck 15 May '18

15 May '18

Hi all, Question : Is there a way to repair the unix file system under Fedora 28 ? Please advise , Ger van Dijck . -- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

2 1

Package dependency paradox with package 'tuned'
by Eino Virtanen 15 May '18

15 May '18

I am using CentOS with a PREEMPT Kernel. I ran an update and encountered the following error: ### --> Running transaction check ---> Package device-mapper-multipath-libs.x86_64 0:0.4.9-119.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: librados.so.2()(64bit) for package: device-mapper-multipath-libs-0.4.9-119.el7.x86_64 ---> Package tuned.noarch 0:2.8.0-5.el7_4.2 will be updated --> Processing Dependency: tuned = 2.8.0 for package: tuned-profiles-realtime-2.8.0-5.el7.noarch --> Running transaction check ---> Package librados2.x86_64 1:0.94.5-2.el7 will be installed ---> Package tuned.noarch 0:2.8.0-5.el7_4.2 will be updated --> Processing Dependency: tuned = 2.8.0 for package: tuned-profiles-realtime-2.8.0-5.el7.noarch --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: tuned-profiles-realtime-2.8.0-5.el7.noarch (@rt) Requires: tuned = 2.8.0 Removing: tuned-2.8.0-5.el7_4.2.noarch (@updates) tuned = 2.8.0-5.el7_4.2 Updated By: tuned-2.9.0-1.el7.noarch (base) tuned = 2.9.0-1.el7 Available: tuned-2.7.1-5.el7.noarch (rt) tuned = 2.7.1-5.el7 Available: tuned-2.8.0-5.el7.noarch (rt) tuned = 2.8.0-5.el7 ### My interpretation is that the 'tuned-profiles-realtime' requires 'tuned' version '2.8.0', but version '2.9.0-1.el7' is currently installed? Should I force installation of 'tuned' version '2.8.0', or what would be a sensible solution to this problem? Thank you in advance, -E

2 3

SeaHorse does not show GPG keys.
by Dirk Gottschalk 15 May '18

15 May '18

Hi. I'm running Fedora 28 on my Notebook. After installing seahorse an it's Nautilus plug-in, I registered that my gpg2 keyring is not shown so I can not manage it. The nautilus plug-in sees them and I can select a key for signing and encrypting files. I did not change anything in my home before or after upgrading to F28 from F27. Does somebody ha a clue? Thanks, Dirk PS: Resend due to thrown error. -- Dirk Gottschalk Paulusstrasse 6-8 52064 Aachen Tel.: +49 1573 1152350

2 1

SeaHorse does not show GPG keys.
by Dirk Gottschalk 15 May '18

15 May '18

Hi. I'm running Fedora 28 on my Notebook. After installing seahorse an it's Nautilus plug-in, I registered that my gpg2 keyring is not shown so I can not manage it. The nautilus plug-in sees them and I can select a key for signing and encrypting files. I did not change anything in my home before or after upgrading to F28 from F27. Does somebody ha a clue? Thanks, Dirk -- Dirk Gottschalk Paulusstrasse 6-8 52064 Aachen Tel.: +49 1573 1152350

1 0

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
...
16
Older →

Jump to page: