Re: A fontpath question. (Samuel Sieb)
by George R Goffe
Samuel,
Yes, xterm still runs... ok as far as I can tell. I don't use it much since I started using Konsole (KDE).
BTW, this release of Fedora is FC30 x86_64. Line numbers in the file are col 1 (produced by less -N.
Here's a part of the font list that xlsfonts displayed:
3929 10x16bold
3930 10x20
3931 10x20
3932 10x20
3933 10x20
3934 12x24
3935 12x24
3936 12x24
3937 12x24
3938 12x24bold
3939 12x24kana
3940 12x24kana
3941 12x24romankana
3942 12x24romankana
3943 3270
3944 3270-12
3945 3270-12bold
3946 3270-20
3947 3270-20bold
3948 3270bold
3949 3270gr
3950 3270gt12
3951 3270gt12bold
3952 3270gt16
3953 3270gt16bold
3954 3270gt24
3955 3270gt24bold
3956 3270gt32
3957 3270gt32bold
3958 3270gt8
3959 3270h
3960 5x7
3961 5x7
3962 5x7
3963 5x8
3964 5x8
3965 5x8
3966 5x8
5 years, 1 month
block size
by Patrick Dupre
parted -l
Model: ATA SK hynix SC311 S (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 512GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags: pmbr_boot
Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 1049kB 787MB 786MB fat32 EFI system partition boot, esp
2 787MB 6156MB 5369MB fat32 Basic data partition msftres
3 6156MB 39.7GB 33.6GB linux-swap(v1) swap
4 39.7GB 40.2GB 524MB ext4 Boot0
5 40.2GB 145GB 105GB VolSys0 lvm
6 145GB 250GB 105GB VolUsr lvm
7 250GB 250GB 524MB ext4 Boot1
8 250GB 355GB 105GB VolSys1 lvm
9 355GB 460GB 105GB ext4 Backup0
Warning: The driver descriptor says the physical block size is 2048 bytes, but
Linux says it is 512 bytes.
Ignore/Cancel?
What should I do?
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne
9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)380395988
===========================================================================
5 years, 1 month
A fontpath question.
by George R Goffe
Hi,
I seem to be doing something incorrectly.
When I run this command:
xterm -bdc -cm -sb -sl 4096 -cr green -ms red -fn '-adobe-courier-bold-o-normal--14-100-100-100-m-90-iso10646-1' -title '-adobe-courier-bold-o-normal--14-100-100-100-m-90-iso10646-1' -e bash
I get this error message:
xterm: cannot load font "-Adobe-Courier-medium-O-*-*-14-100-100-100-M-180-ISO10646-1"
I got a list of fonts from the xlsfonts command so it seems to think this font IS installed. The FONTPATH shell variable is NOT set and neither is FontPath.
I would like to try out several of the other fonts that xlsfonts lists without updating config files. xlsfonts displayed 4210 fonts with duplicates for some reason.
Can anyone see what I'm not doing right? Is it a bug?
Thanks,
George...
5 years, 1 month
extended partition
by Patrick Dupre
Hello,
I just got a SSD (not virgin), but I cannot create an extended partition.
fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sdb: 477 GiB, 512110190592 bytes, 1000215216 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk identifier: 4D6479F4-D61A-4DEA-8F60-35EFBFE445C2
Device Start End Sectors Size Type
/dev/sdb1 2048 1538047 1536000 750M EFI System
/dev/sdb2 1538048 12023807 10485760 5G Microsoft reserved
Is there a reason?
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne
9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)380395988
===========================================================================
5 years, 2 months
Fedora 29 Live CD/USB Cannot Install on Raid nor Boot in UEFI.
by Stephen Morris
Hi,
I have burnt a Fedora 29 workstation live install to DVD and tried
to boot it with the bios set to UEFI mode, but it halted with a boot
error. Thinking there might be an error with the DVD I downloaded a tool
for windows that allowed me to download and burn the F29 installer to
usb, but this failed to boot with the same issue as the DVD. If I
switched the bios into legacy mode both the DVD and USB successfully
booted to the Fedora desktop. From what I have read on the net the live
installer is dual setup, in terms of the documentation said that if the
installer was booted in UEFI mode it would perform a UEFI install and if
it was booted in legacy mode it would do a bios install, so given this
have I done something incorrectly to cause the installer to not boot in
UEFI mode?
Having set my hard disks up in Raid 10 mode I booted the F29
installer in bios mode which successfully booted to the desktop, where I
selected the install to hard disk option which worked fine up to the
point of setting up the disks, where the disk setup could not see any
disks at all to configure for installation. From what I've read on the
internet the workstation installers for F22 through F24 did not support
raid but the equivalent server installers did. Has this still not been
rectified up to the F29 workstation installer?
regards,
Steve
5 years, 2 months
Remote Disencruftation
by Beartooth
I have two email accounts, one at my local access
provider, and one on my own domain, hosted remotely. I'm running Fedora
29. Last time I looked, my host was running Centos. Now I see this:
$ uname -a
Linux <x.y.z> 2.6.32-042stab134.3 #1 SMP Sun Oct 14 12:26:01 MSK 2018
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Is something there the name of a distro?? (I've forgotten the
proper command, with 'release' in it,for asking a remote machine what
it's currently running.)
It's past time I ought to've downloaded a mass of cruft (old
emails) from my host's machine, stored them on some medium here (Maybe a
nice external solid state 2 Tb drive?), and gotten them out of the way.
They're slowing me way down.
I've never gotten around to learning rsync, nor even trying
Grsync. Last time, istr, I made do with cpanel at the host. Now the host
has something new to me, WHM, in front of cpanel, and I haven't the
faintest inkling what all it can do. Is there now good strong new EASY
magic for a subtechnoid like me to do the old chore, or should I just try
to recall how I slogged through before? I feel like a sorcerer's
apprentice, and don't want to drown in cyberspace.
--
Beartooth Staffwright, Not Quite Clueless Power User
Remember I know little (precious little!) of where up is.
5 years, 2 months
fc29 openssh : can't disable StrictHostKeyChecking
by sean darcy
ssh -o stricthostkeychecking=no works.
There's no ~/.ssh/config
grep Strict /etc/ssh/ssh_config
# StrictHostKeyChecking ask
but it doesn't ask:
ssh new-gateway
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@ WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY!
Someone could be eavesdropping on you right now (man-in-the-middle attack)!
It is also possible that a host key has just been changed.
The fingerprint for the ECDSA key sent by the remote host is
SHA256:TylFZRyv2D0miW94XagWwZOFPPCd1PhTRscDSXZHwVw.
Please contact your system administrator.
Add correct host key in /root/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this message.
Offending ECDSA key in /root/.ssh/known_hosts:1
ECDSA host key for [new-gateway]:6878 has changed and you have requested
strict checking.
Host key verification failed.
though it reads the config file correctly:
ssh -G new-gateway | grep strict
stricthostkeychecking ask
I don't want to change the ECDSA host key, because sometimes that
machine is at this address.
any help appreciated
5 years, 2 months
Re: Please Recommend Affordable and Reliable Cloud Storage for 50 TB
of Data
by J.Witvliet@mindef.nl
No?
Fedora would be an excellent choice for making a ceph-cluster
Excuses for auto-typo’s
> On 16 Feb 2019, at 06:17, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming <tdteoenming(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:32 PM <J.Witvliet(a)mindef.nl> wrote:
>>
>> It depends on several crucial points.
>>
>> 1) For how long do you need 50 TB (months, a year, several years, for-ever)
>
> Forever.
>
>>
>> 2) How quickly do you need to retrieve
>
> Infrequent retrieval.
>
>>
>> 3) Reliability
>
> 100% reliability.
>
>>
>> 4) Sensitivity
>
> Personal data.
>
>>
>>
>>
>> 4-> Depending on WHAT you are going to store, it might be that you are simply not even allowed to store it in some cloud
>>
>> 2-> Tape might be an option, if you can wait a day or so J
>>
>> 1-> This defines your financial break-even-point
>>
>> If it is for a short while, you might look for external storage,
>>
>> But when paying hundreds per month, for several years…
>>
>>
>>
>> When you think of local (self) storage, you should definitely look at CEPH-cluster technology: reliable storage, affordable, and master in scalability
>>
>> With 5 machines as OSD, each holding four 6TB-drives, and a couple of monitors, you could get away with it
>
> I am going to google CEPH-cluster technology to know what it is.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Met vriendelijke groet,
>>
>> Hans Witvliet, J, Ing., DMO/OPS/I&S/APH, Kennis Team Opensource
>>
>> Coldenhovelaan 1 Maasland 3531RC Coldehovelaan 1, kamer B213
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Eddie O'Connor [mailto:eoconnor25@gmail.com]
>> Sent: vrijdag 15 februari 2019 12:19
>> To: Community support for Fedora users
>> Cc: Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
>> Subject: Re: Please Recommend Affordable and Reliable Cloud Storage for 50 TB of Data
>>
>>
>>
>> I think DIY is the best route. While some corporations are willing to risk having their data exposed (FB/Cambridge Analytical et al. ) and others can pay the financial price for having their data seen by others, it always boils down to what you want to deal with more (or less)....the amount of times you'll have to explain how some cloud provider screwed up?....or the reliance on your own backups...on your own schedule..and secured through means which fall a little more under your control.
>>
>> Just sayin'...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> EGO II
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019, 4:11 AM Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming <tdteoenming(a)gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 5:04 PM Andy Blanchard <zocalo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 08:49, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
>>> <tdteoenming(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> How about a budget of USD$100 per year? I am increasing my budget from
>>>> USD$50 per year.
>>>
>>> I doubt you're going to find a reputable and reliable provider that
>>> will do 50TB for less than $150 per *month*. Might be worth checkout
>>> BackBlaze though as they are probably the best option right now for
>>> this kind of backup, although it does depend on which of their plans
>>> you'll fall under. Another option could be rental of a VPS+storage
>>> array or an EC2 type instance from one of the smaller providers, but
>>> that amount of disk is still going to be a killer.
>>>
>>> Realistically, I think your cheapest and most reliable option is going
>>> to be to buy some backup hardware and a bunch of tapes. Come up with
>>> a suitable on-site/off-site backup strategy for the media, cycle your
>>> tapes, and *regularly* verify that you can restore the data from them
>>> as expected.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> No matter how reliable and well funded the hosting
>>> business is, you're still giving up an awful lot of control sticking
>>> backups into the cloud, and even the big players can lose data from
>>> time to time - if the data matters, DIY.
>>
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> Noted above statement with thanks.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andy
>>>
>>> The only person to have all his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list -- users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>> ===BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE===
>>
>> The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs):
>>
>> [The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of
>> U.S. Embassy Workers
>>
>> Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/science/sonic-attack-cuba-microwave.html
>>
>> ********************************************************************************************
>>
>> Singaporean Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic
>> Qualifications as at 14 Feb 2019
>>
>> [1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/
>>
>> [2] https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/
>>
>> [3] https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming
>>
>> ===END EMAIL SIGNATURE===
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list -- users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>>
>> Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten.
>>
>> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.
>
> ===BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE===
>
> The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs):
>
> [The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of
> U.S. Embassy Workers
>
> Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/science/sonic-attack-cuba-microwave.html
>
> ********************************************************************************************
>
> Singaporean Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic
> Qualifications as at 14 Feb 2019
>
> [1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/
>
> [2] https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/
>
> [3] https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming
>
> ===END EMAIL SIGNATURE===
Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten.
This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.
5 years, 2 months