users April 2025

users@lists.fedoraproject.org

75 participants
78 discussions

BIOS update, grub boots, Fedora doesn't
by Go Canes 28 Jun '25

28 Jun '25

I recently updated the BIOS on a new Dell XPS 16 running Fedora 40. Prior to the update everything was working fine. After the update, grub displays the boot menu and indicates it is booting the default entry, then...nothing. I have performed the following tests and/or remedial actions: - attempted to downgrade the BIOS - the updated version does not allow downgrading - no change if secure boot is enabled or disabled - confirmed the boot disk (NVMe) is in AHCI mode (not RAID) - tried disabling extra C-states in BIOS - no change - BIOS has self-tests, they all pass - booting older kernels including the rescue kernel do not change the behavior (other than the grub output as to which kernel is being booted) - booting Ventoy works and lets me select other images to boot - booting a f40 netinstall ISO(via Ventoy) (the same one used to instal Fedora 40 on this laptop initially) gets as far as the "install/test/rescue" menu, but otherwise has the same boot failure - booting a f41 netinstall ISO (via Ventoy) has the same behavior as the f40 netinstall ISO - booting clonezilla (via Ventoy) gives multiple messages about trying to read or write outside of the partition - booting a Raspberry Pi x86 ISO (basically a live image) (via Ventoy) displays several boot messages before the system hangs - booting a NetBSD ISO (via Ventoy) displays several boot messages before eventually displaying a "privileged instruction fault" trap and dropping into a debugger Out of all of the above, the only thing that made me go "hmm" was the partition errors from clonezilla, so I did a test where I disabled the NVMe disk and attempted to boot off of a known, good Fedora install on a USB drive. This also failed. My theories and where they break down: - CPU issue: everything boots and works, up to a point, and the BIOS self-test passes. - RAM issue: everything boots and works, up to a point, and the BIOS self-test passes. - NVMe issue: grub boots, and if I disable the NVMe drive, the boot failures persist anyway. Any suggestions?

6 16

dump/restore ftruncate?
by ToddAndMargo 09 May '25

09 May '25

Hi All, Fedora 41 dump-0.4-0.57.b47.fc41.x86_64 When restoring file(s) with `restore`, I get a lot of these messages: restore: <name unknown>: ftruncate: Invalid argument restore: <name unknown>: ftruncate: Invalid argument and on and on and so forth. Everything comes back okay. Is this anything to fret about? Many thanks, -T -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ When we ask for advice, we are usually looking for an accomplice. -- Charles Varlet de La Grange ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

3 5

suppose I remove nvidia card?
by home user 08 May '25

08 May '25

(F-42 stand-alone workstation; gnome) good morning, My F-42 workstation had 21 mixed crashes in a few hours late yesterday, and more in a matter of minutes just a few minutes ago. It was installed yesterday afternoon. It's practically unusable. I'm now on a windows-10 box (separate hardware, no dual boot). In my "securing..." thread, Samuel said: "...Anaconda won't install the proprietary NVidia drivers, so you must be using nouveau. If it works, then great. If you have issues, you might want to install the drivers from rpmfusion." I don't know if the crashes are related to using nouveau, or due to something else. I do not game. The most graphics-intense thing that I do (as far as I know) is watch youtube videos with a resolution of about 1.4k. So I'm wondering... Suppose I remove the graphics card (nvidia GeForce GTX 660; 12 years old) entirely. 1. What do I lose by going without the graphics card? What are the risks? 2. Would I have to install Fedora-42 Workstation all over again?

8 20

Resolving names
by Javier Perez 05 May '25

05 May '25

Help. Looking at the about systemd-resolved question prompted me to try to clear a problem I am having with local DNS. My home system have few pcs and other devices, some of them with static ip addresses set at my local router. My situation is that name resolution does not always work. For example, if I do pepebuho@pepewin:~$ dig bloody ; <<>> DiG 9.18.33 <<>> bloody ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 61697 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;bloody. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: bloody. 0 IN A 192.168.1.5 ;; Query time: 1 msec ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.1#53(192.168.1.1) (UDP) ;; WHEN: Tue Apr 29 03:01:45 EST 2025 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 51 It works, but if I try to ping it, pepebuho@pepewin:~$ ping bloody ping: bloody: Name or service not known pepebuho@pepewin:~$ ping 192.168.1.5 PING 192.168.1.5 (192.168.1.5) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.1.5: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.378 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.5: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.260 ms ^C --- 192.168.1.5 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1035ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.260/0.319/0.378/0.059 ms pepebuho@pepewin:~$ It falis! same thing happens with ssh. I just work around it by using the ip addresses directly, but I remember it used to work several versions away. How can I make it work again? I tried to solve it using grok as a helper but could not make it work. -- ------------------------------ /\_/\ |O O| pepebuho(a)gmail.com ~~~~ Javier Perez ~~~~ While the night runs ~~~~ toward the day... m m Pepebuho watches from his high perch.

7 18

install and grub question
by François Patte 30 Apr '25

30 Apr '25

Bonjour, I have a f40 install on one disk (say /dev/sdc) and I want to install F42 on /dev/sda. I suppose that after the installation grub will propose to start f42 from the new disk, how can I add to grub the now old f40? Is there a step during the install process of f42 to say that I want to add f40 to grub? Thank you F.P.

2 2

securing this workstation.
by home user 30 Apr '25

30 Apr '25

(Fedora-42; stand-alone workstation) This is a totally new Fedora install on a stand-alone workstation, done today. It is not a part of a LAN or WAN or any other home or office network. It is not dual-boot. I do need for Firefox, Thunderbird, and dnf to be able to interact with the "outside world" appropriately. I do occasionally need to be able to download or upload things. Beyond those (and maybe other appropriate things that don't at the moment come to mind), I do not want anyone or anything to be able to get into this workstation. For example, no "ssh", "scp", "rlogin". I gather from the Fedora docs that I should use firewalld or firewalld-config. I have both. But Fedora docs does not give me enough detail. I am not an IT professional. What specifically should I do to keep unwanted people and things out?

16 59

Postfix
by jarmo 29 Apr '25

29 Apr '25

Where to look, postfix service won't start after reboot? Have to start manually every time... And yes service is enabled. Happens every time, when update kernel...? Jarmo

8 17

sagemath
by Patrick Dupre 29 Apr '25

29 Apr '25

Hello, If I am correct, there was a sagemath package in the past, but it seems that it is not available anymore. Could somebody clarifies the situation? Thanks =========================================================================== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com ===========================================================================

3 3

Merge /usr/bin & /usr/sbin after upgrade to F42?
by Doug H. 29 Apr '25

29 Apr '25

The Fedora 42 upgrade merged /usr/bin & /usr/sbin, using a symlink to combine them. On some upgrades this will not happen due to issues noted here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin It is not a big deal either way, but I just noticed that it causes the kernel to get marked as tainted. I run VirtualBox, so my kernel was already being tainted, thus I am inclined to ignore this and not force the merger by hand. I have not found a recommendation for post upgrade merger, but I have not searched too hard for it. Does anybody have an opinion on this? -- Doug H.

3 3

suspend option
by Patrick Dupre 29 Apr '25

29 Apr '25

Hello, I do not have the suspend option available in the gnome menu for a while now. How can I recover it ? Thank. =========================================================================== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com ===========================================================================

3 7